Sparks fly in "Civility Roundtable" immigration discussion Other Issues, posted by Editor, Mountain View Voice Online, on Mar 23, 2012 at 2:38 pm
An event designed to bring some civility back into the debate on illegal immigration did just that, bringing the various sides together in Mountain View on Tuesday for a discussion that was heated at times but ended with opponents shaking hands.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, March 23, 2012, 1:57 PM
Posted by Ken Dreger, a resident of another community, on Mar 23, 2012 at 2:45 pm
The term undocumented immigrants is purposely incorrect in order to sway the public in favor of special interest groups and only clouds the reality of the situation... The term illegal alien is broader and more accurate because it includes undocumented aliens and nonimmigrant visa overstayers. ...the term illegal alien, being broader in scope, is the accurate term to use. In that immigrant connotes legality, the term illegal immigrant is really an oxymoron.
To clarify, an alien is any person who is not a citizen or national of the United States. An immigrant is an alien admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident.
An illegal alien is someone who enters the United States without immigration inspection or without an appropriate visa authorizing entry.
The term illegal immigrant is often used interchangeably with illegal alien. However, the correct term for a person entering the United States unlawfully is illegal alien.
The politically-correct phrase undocumented immigrant has no legal basis - it is simply a term used by those who support open borders as an attempt to reframe terminology used in the immigration debate.
A permanent resident alien is an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residency. Permanent residents are also sometimes referred to as immigrants. Note that the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) broadly defines an immigrant as any alien in the United States, except one legally admitted under specific nonimmigrant categories (INA section 101(a)(15)).
Only legal permanent residents may reside permanently in the United States. The Department of State issues visas for this purpose. Other agencies can adjust one's immigration status to permanent resident alien.
If you continue to use Illegal Immigrant why not use the term Undocumented Pharmacists for drug dealers, or Undocumented asset managers for a thief?
You see, it is only the media who tries to be politically correct when in reality nobody can, something will offend someone at sometime, so let’s just tell it like it is and be truthful about it.
People who overstay visa, sneak over ANY countries borders without documentation ARE “ILLEGAL ALIENS” PERIOD.
Posted by jupiterk, a resident of the Jackson Park neighborhood, on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:25 pm
Rosenberg and other liberals are proof of what kind of ignorant idiots liberals have become. The sanctuary cities like Mountain View, San Jose , San Francisco are sucking blood out of average tax paying citizens and trying to help the law violating and welfare claiming unlawful and undocumented immigrants.
The liberals are spinnign the truth and changing the discussion from how to stop illegal immigration and enforce immigration laws into how to put up with illegal immigration and how to help them out and how we are all responsible to take care of the illegal immigrants and how we should welcome more illegal immigrants in our country. I can't even describe how outraged I am by these rotten liberals who are getting rich at the expense of middle class people and exploiting cheap labor.
Posted by Equal rights for all, a resident of the Jackson Park neighborhood, on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:36 pm
Yes, we did do "that amnesty thing" during the Reagan era, and as far as I can tell has worked out fine. Those people are here working, paying taxes, integrating, and contributing to society to help America be the best it can be. The parents of the SF State student I mentor were beneficiaries of that amnesty and are hard-working people who have raised three law-abiding children who attend school and do volunteer work. That's more than I can say for some of the US citizens I know!
Posted by Ted, a resident of another community, on Mar 23, 2012 at 4:18 pm
"Yes, we did do "that amnesty thing" during the Reagan era, and as far as I can tell has worked out fine."
Yes, "as far as you can tell." That sentence speaks VOLUMES.
So then, your idea is to just not enforce our borders and every 20 years or so, just convert all the new millions of illegals into US citizens by way of amnesty. Delightful.
I'm thrilled, there, Mr. Equal Rights for All, that you've had nothing but positive experiences with illegal immigration. Many of us, however, have not.
Twenty years ago my neighborhood was a nice, middle-class area. Today it is a slum, a ghetto, a barrio, with trash filling the streets, graffiti everywhere, unchecked gang violence. This is one neighborhood in Southern California. I have a feeling - but prove me wrong, pal - that this is not the only neighborhood affected thusly.
Your user name is hysterical and of course typical: "Equal rights for all." Yes, yes, yes, equal rights for all, but only if it comes with absolutely ZERO responsibility, right? That's what you're advocating for. Thank goodness the tide is finally turning against the likes of you.
Posted by Laura Macias, a resident of the St. Francis Acres neighborhood, on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:36 pm
Great summary of the often challenging, difficult conversation and dialogue, Dan!
The American Leadership Forum approach is to hear differing opinions and really listen rather than react. I think Chris Block, the ALF SV director modeled that behavior as did the panelists. They are not easy conversations yet it is better to have them than not to.
I look forward to the next Civility Roundtable in MV.
Posted by Nick, a resident of the Cuesta Park neighborhood, on Mar 23, 2012 at 7:21 pm
Even if you don't agree with rounding up and deporting illegals proactively, what's the argument against deporting them if they commit crimes rather than to have them in our already overcrowded prison system? If it's really 10% of inmates?
Posted by Frustrated, a resident of the Stierlin Estates neighborhood, on Mar 24, 2012 at 2:28 am
You all can argue about this issue until the cows come home, but it still won't change one unalterable fact - the people being talked about are "ILLEGAL ALIENS". Not "should be legal", but "illegal". No matter how pretty you try to dress it up, that is a FACT that currently has not been changed. So it seems unfair to some of you - well guess what? Life is unfair. Some may think that it's unfair that they can't drive a Lamborghini, but that doesn't mean that they can go out and just take one. Why? Because we are a nation of LAWS. You all remember that pesky little word, right? Well, until certain laws are changed, it is illegal to sneak across, or even be snuck across borders by well-meaning parents. So, arguing about how unfair it is on a largely anonymous, small-time paper's web page is a pointless and futile time waster. They are ILLEGAL ALIENS. How thick are you people anyway? This is not hard to comprehend. We have laws, and we have to follow those laws or suffer the consequences, whatever they may be. End of story.
Posted by MV, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Mar 24, 2012 at 12:52 pm
The amount of strain illegal immigrants particularly put on schools should be noted. It is clear if you go to most of the elementary schools in mountain view. Property owners should be outraged as their tax dollars are used to take care of illegals -- day care center, english programs, mixing non-english speaking students...
Bascially all these resources need to support illegal immagrants and students need to come from somewhere and that also means other improvements get effected as we have limited resources..
Mountain View and Santa Clara County politicans are taking their political stance as they are democrats. I am a democrat too but if you live in Mountain View it is hard to overlook at overcrowding of our schools, degrading scores and over-crowding of some the parks. Not well maintained apartment buildings with 2 to 3 families living in a single bedroom apratment. It is a clear problem in Mountain View.
It effects particularly property owners with children as some of their property tax and city resources is not being used for the benefit of the legal citizens or for the legal coommunity. I can atleast smell a civil lawsuit... I wonder why no one has sued a city for misusing its funds to benefit non-community members and baised treatment
Posted by Old Ben, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Mar 24, 2012 at 3:54 pm
This excerpt is telling:
"Why can't you answer the question as to why these people don't want to learn English?" said a middle aged man to some younger Latina women, one of who responded by saying, "Why should you have to do that? This is Silicon valley. We should embrace other cultures. We should be open-minded."
So-called "Hispanic" immigrants are the first to come here and demand services in their native language. We may all be descended from immigrants, but ALL of those immigrants learned English. A common language facilitates unity and harmony in a multicultural society. Immigrants adapt to the new land. Only colonials expect the new land to adapt to them.
And enough already with all the "Primer mi Raza" nonsense. That and "Viva la Raza" are blatantly racist expressions. How would you feel if "white" people started marching around saying "First my Race" or "Life to the Race"?
Posted by Frustrated, a resident of the Stierlin Estates neighborhood, on Mar 24, 2012 at 7:26 pm
Welcome to the "unbiased" reporting skills of Dan and Nick. I have been complaining about comments that Nick has written for quite some time. He seems incapable of using the word "illegal", or any iteration of it. You hit the nail on the head. His reporting is definitely lacking. Hence his position as a writer for our little paper...
Oh, and I'm sure this post will be removed because it has "objectionable content". You all know what I'm talking about.
Posted by Donald, a resident of another community, on Mar 25, 2012 at 5:53 pm
Someone who is here without documents has not necessarily entered the country illegally, and it is important to make this distinction, although many people find it convenient not to do so. Many people enter legally with a visa (e.g. a student visa) and stay after the visa expires. They are then here without documents but have not committed the crime of entering illegally. Technically they have committed a violation that is punishable by a fine, and they have not committed a crime that is punishable by deportation. Calling all undocumented aliens "illegal" is incorrect and is not useful when trying to address the complex problems that we are facing.
Posted by Steve, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Mar 26, 2012 at 11:17 am
"We want to be able to give back to the country that has provided for us," Vargas said of himself and others who were brought to the country as children, but are not here legally. He called them the "Dream Act kids" -- well-educated youths forced to work under-the-table jobs.
The existing immigration laws do not prevent "giving back". Just follow the laws and apply for immigration, and once accepted, you can "give back" all you want. In the internet age, you can even "give back" while living outside the US. So being able to "give back" is not a motivation. When you say "give back", what you mean is "be treated as though you followed the law even though you didn't".
Yes, we understand it was the parents that are responsible for you being here illegally. You'll need to discuss that issue with them.
Posted by Steve, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Mar 26, 2012 at 11:37 am
"District Attorney Jeff Rosen later addressed the issue in his breakout group, where he said the undocumented make up 10 percent of the County's jail and prison population while they make up the same proportion of the county's general population."
How would the county know how many undocumented people are in prison - since they do not check for documentation? It should be noted that since immigration violations are a federal offense, undocumented offenders are held in federal prisons - not in county or state jails or prisons.
" Citing an Urban Institute study, director of research for the Center for Immigration Studies Steven Camorata noted in 2004: "Roughly 17 percent of the prison population at the federal level are illegal aliens. That's a huge number since illegal aliens only account for about 3 percent of the total population."
Posted by rked, a resident of another community, on Mar 26, 2012 at 12:32 pm
"When Mitt Romney says in Cedar Rapids that people like me should get in the back of the line, I would love to know where that line is," Vargas said
I Can tell vargas "Where the Line Is" [Portions removed. Please refrain from personal attacks.]...the line IS returning to the Phillipines, AND applying for a Visa The RIGHT Way....but of course "mr 1 topic vargas" Already Knows this But has NO intention of emmigrating here LEGALLY....nuff said!!!!!
Posted by Old Ben, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Mar 27, 2012 at 10:08 am
If I "lose" my documents and become an "undocumented native", will I get the same treatment as these "undocumented immigrants"? That's the bottom line, here. Will I get the same exemption from DMV requirements? I tend to doubt it.