Post a New Topic
Original post made
on May 18, 2012
I will vote yes on Prop 29, but I wish it was more like $20 a pack. People need to wake up to how bad smoking is for them (and everyone around them).
How about $100. a pack, puff reefer instead I say.
Vote NO on 29. On the surface it seems like all the tax dollars are going to Cancer research, but in truth. It's not.
People who are going to vote yes on 29, are voting with their emotions. Get the facts before you vote.
I don't care where the money is going. I don't care if they burn it. All I care about is that they make people who still think it's okay to smoke, especially in public, quit because they can't afford it.
When I was in high school, cigarettes were under a dollar a pack. Every few years, they add on another tax and claim that people will quit because of the cost, or not start such a bad habit to begin with. Complete and utter B.S.
If people want to smoke, they're going to smoke. The price has more than quadrupled in the past 25 years, and it' hasn't stopped them... and those taxes that keep getting added to for anti-smoking campaigns, health coverage, etc... they haven't done any good either, as I still see people smoking everywhere, every day.
Not to mention, when our govt. is already bloated, this additional tax comes with MORE government. It's not like they're writing a check to cancer research, there will be committees and salaries and political appointees whittling away at that dollar per pack that cancer research will probably only get a few cents... and, the money they do get doesn't have to be spent in California. Taxes on Californians should be spent in the state to get ourselves out of the hole we're in. Not a single cent goes to balancing the state's budget (what taxes should really be for).
People are probably going to vote by emotion instead of reason and pass this, but don't be surprised when you notice that nothing will change.
What has happened to freedom in this country?
Freedom means putting up with things you might object to.
I don't smoke. I never have. I think it's disgusting and can't understand how anyone could ever start.
But I believe a person has the right to smoke.
To all the dumb dumbs out there saying to raise the tax to $20 a pack. You'd only create a black market for cigarettes.
People are going to smoke. Deal with it. I'm sure we all do something that someone else thinks is stupid. That doesn't mean they should be able to tell you stop.
I will be voting no on the cigarette tax. I do not smoke cigarettes but I do smoke cigars. I buy my cigars out of state for this very reason! Why should people pay taxes for a product that they are harassed for using? Smoker's are a minority that people feel good about discriminating against.
If you listen to the people in the video, a couple of them think they know what is best for other people. The truth is that it is thin, healthy people that put the most burden on the health care system because when they get old, the cost of their health care in their declining decade or so far exceeds that of those who smoke.
This tax, like most other taxes will only go to more bloated government bureaucracy and waste! Those who don't smoke will feel good because they are punishing those "dirty, nasty" smokers, but the fact is that they will be only be hurting their friends, family and community.
The money that will be wasted by this tax could have been spent instead in the community to the benefit of stores, schools, and restaurants. Already there are a lot more vacant storefronts on and near Castro Street than I have seen in a long time. If this tax passes, I can guarantee that you will see more unemployment and less local services as funds are transferred from the private to the public sector. Then those of you who voted for this can smile knowing you put your neighbors out of work.
I agree with my neighbor Otto, "Freedom means putting up with things you might object to." Furthermore, freedom means taking responsibility for your actions. Smoking causes cancer. If you choose to smoke, then you should cough up a buck a pack (pardon the pun) to do something about the results of this choice.
To those concerned about the money spent on cigarettes staying in California, outside of the taxes already levied on tobacco, what fraction of the remainder goes to California jobs and how much goes to the big tobacco companies based in Virginia, North Carolina, New York and overseas? I bet the out-of-state companies that are spending tens of millions in advertising to defeat this measure are anticipating reaping many times that amount in profits from California pockets if they prevent prop 29.
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Developers and Development
By Steve Levy | 28 comments | 1,640 views
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 1,139 views
What it's like to have a tween
By Jessica T | 0 comments | 1,012 views
Ooyala Watches How You Watch Videos
By Angela Hey | 0 comments | 486 views
The Changing American Family
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 436 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2013 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.