Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jul 9, 2012
Thanks Chez TJ, maybe now the Council will listen and understand that the building next door can be restored, repurposed and fit that block.
Tell the developer to build tall down at Calif. and San Antonio, after all the Council hasn't consistently protected that neighborhood from taller developments and increased crazy drivers.
Hey Voice, you don't have my neighborhood in your list. Is that why those of us who live on or near California get so little respect from the City?
This project has all the earmarks of DOG CITY II..
" Deja vu all over again "
You have to wonder if the fix was already in....
I've discussed at length what the Denver Metro area does with historic houses.....THEY KEEP THEM! Not put up a fancy plaque where the house WAS. The HOUSE gets the plaque....
If I had to guess. I would say the City Council will approve the demo. Historic or not. It doesn't generate enough revenue for the city council's liking.
That house is a piece of junk. Get rid of it already. There is a 6 story parking garage and a 5 story office building right across the street from that over hyped, over priced restaurant.
There used to be junky houses (actually converted horse carriage stalls) on the other side of the street where the condo complex now is. You want to make in improvement to downtown, you have to clear out the brush.
And while we are at it, let's get rid of Chez TJ too. When was the last time a low income housing occupant could even afford to stand outside that restaurant? Chez TJ is for profit company, and they are pulling the oldest trick in the book trying to gather "community support" to keep their pockets lined with gold.
Peter Gilli's comment "you shouldn't assume that because the porch is falling apart that the historic building is as bad" makes me wonder how much he has personally inspected that building (5 minutes' walk from City Hall).
When touring Chez TJ's herb garden during its public showings a couple weeks back, I noticed on that side (away from Bryant) the old building's roof appears to be falling in. Maybe we still shouldn't assume anything from both the roof and the porch collapsing, but that building has been vacant, and evidently neglected by its owner, for how many years now (since the former shop in it closed)?
"...meets city guidelines for the site..."
Maybe if they offered more cash. $4 million doesn't go as far as it used to, you know.
Sure, why not. Then frkn google can buy it and push ALL the mom & pop Bussiness out of town. WAKE UP MV DON'T PUT ALL YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET
To BurnitDown: Since when does a business have to exist for everyone, all income levels? There is no reason to get rid of higher-end restaurants or businesses just because we can't all go there. For that matter, lots of places downtown are not affordable to all people.
The "Pearson House" is a mess. And it will only get worse. The current owner wants to tear it down.
If he loses this vote I promise he will just let it sit.. and crumble.. until there is nothing left standing and the city begs him to haul away the remains.
The council needs to let people do what they want with their property.
All of the area bounded by Franklin, Evelyn, Bryant and Church streets, including the Pearson (no relation) house an Chez TJ are undergoing a long-term transition from mainly parking lots and small, single-story buildings to bigger, taller multi-family homes and mixed commercial-residential developments. Building heights will eventually average out at 3 to 5 stories, even on Castro Street.
I agree that a 4-story wall right next to Chez TJ will interfere with its garden and overall ambiance but the grossly run-down mess (Pearson house) is not a pleasant neighbor either.
The City Council has a tough decision and I will accept their solution. (Of course, I have very little skin in the game; I can afford to be complacent.)
I don't see this building becoming DOG CITY II, times are different and office space is sorely needed. The Pearson house is kinda of old and rundown, yes it can be fixed up but to house what. We don't have such a big retail market in downtown. Yes Retail space is needed, we need more retail stores, we also need to offset Google which I don't have a problem with. I have read about certain building being purchased, I think Google has purchased enough buildings, they seem to be growing away from Mountain View while here it will be Home Office.
Maybe its time to move to Campbell or Willow Glen, if Mountain View keeps modernizing its old-time charm away. Do Google employees really commute from San Francisco only because Mountain View lacks modern multi-story structures? Or are we selling out a vibrant community to financial interests?
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 3,526 views
Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,998 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2014 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.