Boundary change's possible fallout Schools & Kids, posted by Editor, Mountain View Voice Online, on Jul 7, 2007 at 12:32 am
With the decision for Los Altos School District boundary changes now final, the district's hired demographer, Jeanne Gobalet, said she thinks the Mountain View-Los Altos High School District might have to follow suit and make changes of its own.
Posted by Serge Bonte, H2G Resident, a resident of the Cuesta Park neighborhood, on Jul 7, 2007 at 12:32 am
This is unbelievable.
Our growth-neutral neighborhood got shoved to a more distant school on the premise that it was needed to overcome potential (in 4-5 years based on worst demographic projections) overcrowding at Almond. Now it looks like in the process we will become the source of overcrowding at MVHS (3 miles away by car) while LAHS is walking distance.
Thankfully, the same demographer will help solve this new looming High School attendance "crisis". If history is any guide, the solution will entail opening a new high school on the Bullis Pussima site and move our growth-neutral neighborhood as an overflow to a Cupertino High School.
If opening that new high school is not enough to fill up the Bullis Purissima campus, plans could be explored to move portions of FootHill College there.
Posted by Parent, a resident of the Waverly Park neighborhood, on Jul 20, 2007 at 8:33 am
Not sure why attendance lines in the elementary districts would have any impact on high school. The high school boundaries are probably based on balancing the number of kids per school, and have never had anything to do with which elementary/middle schools the kids go to. Mountain View Whisman used to assign kids to middle school based on their elementary school; but now they are assigned based on residence--one side of Central goes to Graham, the other side to Crittenden, no matter what elementary school you attended. Graham kids have always gone on to different High Schools-probably the majority to Mountain View, but a large percentage to Los Altos--based on residence. I think the same is true for Crittenden, though I think most of them have gone to Los Altos. So I really don't see that LASD's attendance boundaries have anything at all to do with MVLA's boundaries.
Posted by Serge Bonte, a resident of the Cuesta Park neighborhood, on Jul 21, 2007 at 9:34 pm
I don't know why either.
But neither do I understand all the nonsensical decisions by the LASD. Attendance to High School in that district gets decided (mostly) by attendance to middle school. LASD in its recent redistricting, shoved over our neighborhood to Blake which will lead to MVHS vs. LAHS (which is down the street on Almond for us).
Posted by Amanda, a resident of the The Crossings neighborhood, on Jul 22, 2007 at 3:49 pm
I think this isn't quite right. The MVLA high school district's decision is independent of the LASD borders. MV High has become more crowded, not less, and if anything, the attendance line will be drawn closer to that school. The high school line has never been related to Blach attendance, except that many of the kids who go to Blach live close enough to MV High to attend there.
I cannot imagine that the H2G neighbourhood would end up at MV high school... But then, I wouldn't really be surprised by anything these days, as we get to pass three schools to go three miles just to elementary school.