Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS ELECTIONS
  MOVIES   OTHER ISSUES   RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS
  SPORTS   EDITOR'S DESK   EXTRA!CREDIT   GOOGLE WATCH
  HEY TECH!   KIDS IN TOW   PANTHER PEN   SILICON AND SYNAPSE
  TRIP TALK

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Plan for sustainable city whittled to 19 goals
Elections, posted by Editor, Mountain View Voice Online, on Apr 2, 2009 at 10:53 pm

After a year of work by dozens of local environmentalists, City Council members have narrowed down a long list of goals to create the city's first "environmental sustainability action plan," to be approved early next year.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, December 19, 2008, 4:00 PM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by jps, a resident of the Old Mountain View neighborhood, on Apr 2, 2009 at 10:53 pm

Looking at the original recommendations -- Web Link -- two ideas are missing:

1. Contract with PG&E to arrange to purchase 100% wind power electricity over the long term. Wind is a direct mitigation in addition to being a renewable energy source because it extracts energy directly from the atmosphere. It is also the least expensive of the renewable sources, already very competitive with coal. The more communities who set up their PG&E contracts to buy only wind power, the better. Anyone who thinks wind is a bad idea because it's intermittent hasn't read this: Web Link We should stop subsidizing coal, gas, and oil, and let people have less expensive-in-the-long-run electricity instead.

2. Purchase only new plug-in hybrid vehicles. The more communities who adopt these goals, the faster we will return to a sustainable and less flood-prone (i.e., a less expensive) future. As soon as gasoline starts going up again, it will be a lot less expensive.

The same can be said about the "public option" of universal health care coverage: If we don't have it, people end up with the partial coverage which prevents so much preventative care, resulting in expensive emergency room hospitalizations followed by long hospital stays instead of regular visits with early detection of problems. People in Canada live two years longer with their universal coverage, and they pay a lot less than we do for medical expenses.


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.