Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Nov 28, 2007
The article titled, "Residents, pet sitters fight over dog park" written by Daniel DeBolt got it all wrong. DeBolt did not report the facts. A majority of the residents of Mountain View attending the meeting supported the city councils decision to not restrict the number of dogs at the park. What we witnessed was a council acting on behalf of the majority of its constituents in a responsible manner. Why is the Mountian View voice against pet owners and their dogs? Why is the Mountain View Voice attacking the city council? This is irresponsible reporting and doesn't belong in Mountain View. One disgruntled pet owner should not dictate the voice of all pet owners in Mountain View and the Voice should not be so unwise to not report the facts of the meeting. Residents and pet sitters were in agreement at this meeting. People expressed that they only go when the pet sitters are there because they know that their dogs are really good dogs. There aren't a lot of dog parks where people can be sure that they are bringing their dogs into a safe environment. More and more we need to have a dual income in order to live in this city. What happens when we have to go off to work during the day and we have a dog? We aren't allowed to have someone take care of our dogs and take them to the dog park? Is the dog park all about people and not our dogs? The pet sitters are providing a wonderful service that not only gives the dogs exercise but reinforces their training as well. This city council meeting was harmonious and the council stressed that they are going to work diligently on creating a permit system for pet sitters who will be able to bring more than 3 dogs to the dog park. The pet sitters will have to display openely their permit number so a citizen can file a complaint about a pet sitter they think is acting in a non-professional manner or who is being negligent with their dogs. In my opinion, this is a very peaceful resolution to an issue that has become extremely tense. Let's give our city council the support and patience it needs to act toward solving this problem.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Freebirds Palo Alto shutters, Pieology to move in
By Elena Kadvany | 12 comments | 3,109 views
A Glimpse into local HS Suicide
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 2,152 views
Deny the 429 Univ Ave Project Appeal
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 1,301 views
Now Playing - Your Dinner!
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 909 views
Teens and Cutting, What's Going On?
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 197 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2015 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.