Town Square

Post a New Topic

Will council give businesses more time to move?

Original post made on Dec 23, 2011

In a quiet corner of Silicon Valley you can find an original Heidelberg press, a marvel from the heyday of mechanical engineering, humming along daily to produce the sort of embossed, perforated and hot-foil-stamped stationery a Kinkos employee could only dream of.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, December 23, 2011, 11:58 AM

Comments (3)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joy S
a resident of The Crossings
on Dec 23, 2011 at 3:43 pm

Permits, etc, won't be completed before 18 months but the businesses are given 4 months? Small-Business friendly? Why not give them a year. Is it better to have these buildings empty for 14 months?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by A. Lincoln
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Dec 23, 2011 at 5:24 pm

I can't understand why the council would not give this firm the time that they need, which will impact no one else.

Don't they understand that no sane person expects a 25 year old timetable drawn by long forgotten councilors to proceed like clockwork, or even proceed at all? Who would bother to plan for relocation in such circumstances. In the end, when they get around to environmental impact studies, there will probably be years and years of industrial pollution to contend with, and a better use of this land might be to leave things as they are.

I'm a retired computer professional and I've never had anything to do with small business or printing, and I've never used this firm's services or know anyone who has. I had to look up the location on the map, and I certainly don't have a dog in this fight.

This is a matter of simple common sense and good will, and a certain revulsion at the lack of reasonable judgment that such "zero tolerance" responses demonstrate.

Shame on councilors Means and Abe-Koga for being so literal and small minded. What in the world are such by-the-book people doing in city givernment?



 +   Like this comment
Posted by Julie Stanford
a resident of Shoreline West
on Jan 5, 2012 at 2:59 pm

I emailed Abe-Koga about this and she said she was misquoted. This is what she wrote me (and said she wrote the voice as well):
I want to correct inaccuracies in your article and editorial on the Mora Drive businesses that must eventually find a new home in compliance with the Mountain View Precise Plan. Contrary to the impression given by the article, I support giving the businesses more time to find a new location. I made the motion to grant the request for a study, and I voted in favor of it. I would have preferred to fast-track a vote on the extension, but the City's process only allowed for a study of the extension.

I did express my position that the extra 18 months the property owner requested is too long, given that the Precise Plan, which was adopted in 1987, allowed 25 years for the conversion to residential. In those 25 years, the surrounding area has filled in with housing in compliance with the Plan, placing families next door to some businesses that are inappropriate neighbors.

Crucial facts were omitted from the article. Two-thirds of the businesses on Mora Drive would have been non-compliant uses of the land even under the original zoning. One of these businesses, a landscape contractor, is the subject of ongoing complaints from neighbors. Some Mora Drive businesses have people living in them against city code. The City chose not to enforce code violations because of the upcoming deadline for conversion.

As a former small business owner, I understand the challenges in running and making a business a success. But I also understand that a city has guidelines and rules that need to be followed in the attempt to make land uses compatible with one another, especially when it comes to businesses within residential neighborhoods. I believe the City can strike a balance between giving businesses time to relocate and fulfilling the City's promise to surrounding residents.

I am always open to looking at guidelines, allowing flexibility and considering changes, but that was not what this gatekeeper request was about nor was this about moving forward with an apartment project on these properties.

I will also note that Simon Printing is a type of business that would be permitted under the new residential zoning. The property owners, not the City, will decide whether they want to accommodate it in their plans for the property.
---------------

My personal opinion is that given how long permitting takes, this business should be allowed to stay and find a new space. It's a great addition to the community and I have personally been a satisfied customer in the past.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 2,392 views

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,045 views

Death with Dignity
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,202 views

With a Perspective....
By Ms. Jenson | 0 comments | 420 views

10 Tried and True Ways to Increase Happiness
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 187 views