Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Feb 7, 2012
Sounds like a bunch of swingers are looking for a break from the city while the rest of us have to wait in line and pay our fees.
I think some key information about the farmhouse was not mentioned in this article. Saving the farmhouse will cost about three quarters of a million dollars. If the entire cost for saving and rehabilitating the farmhouse was passed on to the future residents of the Mountain View Cohousing Community, it would add almost $40,000 to the price of each home, which would be beyond the means of many of these residents. Saving this farmhouse was considered a priority by the Community Development staff and the City Council, since preservation of historic resources benefits the City of Mountain View. The future residents of the Mountain View Cohousing Community look forward to sharing this historic resource with the Old Mountain View neighborhood.
So you are suggesting that this is just a shell game then? The council just changes city codes to help this sweetheart project and deal along? Yeah, right. This is more about saving each investor $35,000. The farmhouse was supposedly part of the original plan. Cost were supposedly factored in. So now who will own the farmhouse?
Susan - don't worry about the naysayers and conspiracy theorists lurking around these message boards. It's great that the Habitat and Co-Housing projects came along to finally push the City into offering developers some real incentives towards historic preservation. Mountain View is fortunate to have private property owners willing to spend the extra time and money to preserve our historic landmarks. Offering some exemptions from park and affordable housing fees seems like a very fair trade for the public benefit provided by preservation of City landmarks. These structures are irreplaceable and add so much to the character of Old Mountain View. Thank you for working to restore one of them!
That's right. All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
A bunch of crazy old white people (formerly hippies) at it again.
this makes me livid! So MY tax dollars are going to line the pockets of those fortunate enough to already have their sweet nest egg already in place? They have many housing options.
This is an outrageous use of public money. We should be helping the have-nots and not the haves!
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,830 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,795 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,264 views
Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 581 views
The Opposite of What You Don't Want
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 350 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2015 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.