Town Square

Post a New Topic

High-speed rail price tag drops by $30B in new plan

Original post made on Apr 2, 2012

California's proposed high-speed rail system would extend from the Central Valley to the Los Angeles Basin within the next decade and would cost $30 billion less than previous estimates indicated under a new business plan that the agency charged with building the system released this morning, April 2.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, April 2, 2012, 10:32 AM

Comments (24)

Posted by Alex M., a resident of Willowgate
on Apr 2, 2012 at 2:45 pm

So, does this drop in the price tag bring it down the price voters originally approved?
I don't think so.
Is the revised plan in agreement with what voters originally approved?
I don't think so.

Posted by LIES, a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 2, 2012 at 2:59 pm

This is probably nothing but lies, when the true reality is way higher.

Sugar coating this failed idea is not a good way to go.

Posted by jupiterk, a resident of Gemello
on Apr 2, 2012 at 3:24 pm

If we all whine more, the price may drop another #30B by next week. Wow, how does something drop by $30B. Something is really fishy here. Are they going to lay the tracks with matchsticks now instead of meta?

Posted by Jes' Sayin', a resident of Blossom Valley
on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:02 pm

Bakersfield to Merced? I've heard of the bridge to nowhere. Is this the railroad to nowhere?

Posted by Observer, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:42 pm

But Mountain View will still get four tracks according to this plan.

A plan that is 30 billion less than 6 times the original estimate, but all of a sudden sold as a savings to the taxpayer while only 1/20 has been raised and therefore the rest will somehow have to be borrowed. Well, more or less. Only in California. But we should all be grateful.

Posted by steve, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:42 pm

... and I have a bridge I'd like to sell you

Posted by Grumpy, a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:57 pm

This is bait and switch to try and fool the fools who voted for this boondoggle to start with.

Posted by Fools Rush In, a resident of Gemello
on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:34 pm

To save even more:

1. Pull the plug on CAHSR now.

2. Change CAHSR from "California High Speed Railroad" to "Can't Afford
Having Such Ridiculosity".

3. If the CAHSR folk really need a train set to play with, let them do it with their own money.

4. If CAHSR was really such a great idea, don't you suppose the major transportation companies in CA would be campaigning to be part of it?

Posted by Garrett, a resident of another community
on Apr 3, 2012 at 12:34 pm

When I voted for HSR, the 9 billion dollars was only to get it started, so much needs to be done, yes looking for ways to getting the cost lower is good, if needed we can spend the money on improvements. We will have to market the system, we have visitors from out of state who would love to ride the train, see the state. S.D. with stops at Disneyland, Hollywood, Yosemite, and San Francsico. The business traveler from San Francsico with stops in San Jose, L.A, Orange County and S.D. The interstate traveler who just would like to catch a ride with transfer points. 3 classes, tickets prices, family prices, business traveler pass, monthly, yearly passes, Wi-Fi, dining car, bar, vista car, cars with rooms, meeting space, etc I would rather spend the money and ride on the train, then getting stuck on a airplane with peanuts and cramped seats, delays, airport traffice, parking lots fees

Posted by Illogical, a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 3, 2012 at 3:13 pm


The amount of people that will travel this train won't pay for 1% of the operating costs, let alone the cost to build. This will be another money pit the state will fall into. I'd rather take my prius down there, that way I won't have to rent a car.

Posted by Otto Maddox, a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 3, 2012 at 3:44 pm

I can't remember, ever, a time when I thought "I wish I could take a train to Los Angeles."

Why? Because I can take a PLANE. For $160 I can fly to Southern California. On a plane that is considerably faster than any train.

Posted by Ron Haley, a resident of another community
on Apr 3, 2012 at 6:32 pm

Ron Haley is a registered user.

Pick a number, any number!

Posted by Monte, a resident of another community
on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:12 pm

Wow! I had no idea that HSR was going to go to Yosemite. Is this a yet to be released "press release" from one of the HSR's PR agencies?

laughable, but sadly right on track (ha!) with all the other gibberish **** the HSR PR machine belches.

Posted by Build it and you will ride, a resident of another community
on Apr 4, 2012 at 11:27 pm

All you naysayers ...that's what everybody said about BART....

Posted by Build it and you will TAKEN for a ride, a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 5, 2012 at 1:02 pm

"All you naysayers ...that's what everybody said about BART...."




Posted by Steve, a resident of Rex Manor
on Apr 5, 2012 at 1:28 pm


Were you here in 1962? Did you know BART was never put to a public vote in San Mateo or Santa Clara Counties? That's right, Silicon Valley never got a chance to join the 21st century until it's first decade was already over. We can agree that HSR has done a bad job so far. We can also agree that widening I-5 and SR 99 as well as building more runways somewhere would not be cheap either. Everything beyond that is my crystal ball vs yours. How much will jet fuel cost? How much solar would be used for HSR? I don't know either. I do know that the Peninsula's approach to arguing with HSR has mostly succeeded in adding cost and time. If that kills it, maybe our kids will have to do what we did not have the guts to do.

Posted by Jim Neal, a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 5, 2012 at 2:25 pm

This is exactly why I voted against the High Speed Rail project to begin with. California was broke when this passed and the money is supposed to be coming from a bond (i.e. borrowed money that must be paid back with interest!). Does anyone know of any Bank that loans money to bankrupt people? No? Then why should the people be loaning money to a bankrupt State?!!! It is a project that is not needed, not wanted, and that will never be profitable. The projections for profitability are based on 2 million riders which will never happen at the rates they will have to charge for the service. The airlines will kill them and if they don't, the fact that you can drive your own car to LA in roughly the same time as taking the train will!

I also don't like the fact that the State is seeking to exempt itself from the same environmental laws it wants to shove down our throats every time we want to use our fireplaces or barbecues. I think they should get to enjoy the same restrictions they apply to us every time we try to use one of our constitutionally protected rights! Let them get tied up in court for the next century because there's an endangered cockroach in King County that absolutely cannot be relocated to a new habitat.

HSR, it's an idea whose time has never come. Talk to us AFTER YOU GET RID OF THE STATE'S DEBT!

Posted by Hardin, a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 5, 2012 at 3:45 pm

"If that kills it, maybe our kids will have to do what we did not have the guts to do."


This is where I have the most concern with folks who still support HSR in its current form. A project of this size and complexity is a poor candidate for Hail Mary leaps of faith.

Considering the poor performance we've seen with the HSR management team thus far, the incentives that motivate their advocacy of this project, and the current finances of the State, this is NOT the project to be decided upon based on something as whimsical as "guts".

A good gambler knows to set aside his money and play with the house money as soon as he can. In this case, we're implementing an exactly opposite strategy.

Posted by Old Steve, a resident of Rex Manor
on Apr 5, 2012 at 3:59 pm

Fine! If you last two had been in charge back in the day:

We would not have Hetch Hetchy water,
We would not have BART at all, not just not here,
We would not have either Golden Gate or Bay Bridges.

All were first of their kind, bond funded projects begun during financially challenging times.

Silicon Valley, meet the 19th Century.

Posted by kman, a resident of Monta Loma
on Apr 6, 2012 at 9:45 am

If I have a choice between driving an electric vehicle verses taking a train, it will most definitely be an electric car. Look at the history of train use and you'll see they can barely stay above water. There is really no need for a train like this.

For those that insist on taking a train, there are already trains available for such a journey.

Posted by Hardin, a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 6, 2012 at 12:27 pm

"All were first of their kind, bond funded projects begun during financially challenging times."


You're glossing over the details, and as we all know, the devil is in the details:

1. Most of the projects you listed did not have competing venues that offered alternatives. These was no other way to travel from Marin to San Francisco without the Golden Gate, nor was there any other existing alternative that could compete with Hetch-Hetchy.

HSR has to not only make budget sense, it needs to make business sense, and common sense. With alternatives like air travel, and electric vehicles, HSR has tough competition to overcome.

2. Size matters. The Golden Gate Bridge would have cost $1.2 billion, in 2003 dollars.

Web Link

Even at that cost, it is only 1/100th of the PROJECTED cost for HSR. This also illuminates another point: construction is much more expensive nowadays, than in the past. The Golden Gate bridge project did not have nearly the amount of environmental review, safety factors, and enhanced engineering requirements due to improved building codes in a seismically active area, than projects now do.

To sum it up, making comparisons to past accomplishments, ignores the current added risks and cost that are unavoidable in construction today.

You are comparing apples and oranges.

Posted by Old Steve, a resident of Rex Manor
on Apr 6, 2012 at 1:49 pm


Why do you not consider ferries to be competition for the Golden Gate?

San Francisco already had Spring Valley Water when they went ahead with Hetch Hetchy.

No project this large (or larger,like Hoover Dam) can accurately estimate construction costs at this stage of development. Sure we have more environmental reg's. We also use computers and have better educated engineers. It is ok with me if we disagree on the vision thing. Throughout history, most visionary projects have had to overcome rabid opposition, since most people are not visionary.

I'm not asking for a blank check. Since the HSR bond money cannot be reallocated to other worthy government expenses anyway, we should all vigilantly stay on the HSR while they do their work. Even after the legislature votes in June, we'll still have more opportunities to cut them off if need be.

Once we cut them off, can you guarantee we won't need more freeway lanes or runways? That videoconferencing will eliminate business travel? That Jet fuel won't triple in cost over the next 20 years?

Working on HSR is a hedge against any of those things.

Posted by Hardin, a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 6, 2012 at 2:54 pm

"Why do you not consider ferries to be competition for the Golden Gate?"


Not to get into too much detail, but HSR does not provide a cheaper, faster, or more convenient method of travel over existing transportation options. Compare this to the Golden Gate Bridge, which was (as still is) cheaper, faster, and more convenient than the options available when it was built.

If anything, HSR is the ferry-like option of today.

Posted by Hardin, a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 6, 2012 at 3:38 pm

"Throughout history, most visionary projects have had to overcome rabid opposition, since most people are not visionary."


It's my opinion that not having a great deal of visionary people is a good thing. Too many cooks in the kitchen comes to mind.

And let's not forget the "visionary" projects that go down in flames.

Web Link

Vision, without successful planning and execution is what leads to the proverbial "pipe dream".

The results of the planning and execution by the HSR so far leads me to believe this is a disaster waiting to happen, and that by continuing with this, we are just throwing good money after bad.

Don't get me wrong, I want to see mass transit improvements. But the amount of money we are dedicating to this singe mass transit project, coupled with the current performance of HSR management's team tells me we should pass on this one.

We need to consider opportunity cost in the case, as well as the financial commitments we are making for a state that is already teetering financially. Consider how many smaller, focused regional projects could be completed with this same amount of money, and consider that having a group of projects is more scalable, allowing us to control spending as the state's finances permit.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Veggie Grill coming soon to Mountain View's San Antonio Center
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 3,020 views

Allowing Unauthorized Immigrants to Learn and Earn Legally Will Help the Economy
By Steve Levy | 38 comments | 2,707 views

Is HBO's Silicon Valley Any Good?
By Anita Felicelli | 18 comments | 1,950 views

The No Sweat Way to Bike to Work
By Janet Lafleur | 6 comments | 1,783 views

Analyze data yourself with R - a fast growing language for statistics, forecasting and graphs
By Angela Hey | 1 comment | 639 views