Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Apr 4, 2012
This just puts the students behind when they enter college and the real world, which does not make such accommodations for missing assignments or not showing up to work.
But, the grading in high school and college is not Real World.
And to your point, in the Real World, they do actually make accoommodations. It takes many incidents before a person gets fired. One such missing assignment usually just results in an angry boss, and having to spend a great deal of your weekend finishing the project. Sounds a bit like the same thing to me.
Having the letter grade be based on academic standards makes a lot more sense than including things like work habits, etc. to influence (for better or worse) the student's academic grade? Isn't this how the K-8 district does it with the 1-2-3-4s for academic standards and the N, S and Es for behavior?
It is also how the students will be graded in college so at a minimum having the upper grade high school students be graded on the basis of how well they have mastered the academic standards of the course.
"...many of the grading policies in place today were created, in part, to help the military sort through recruits. If that were the sole purpose, things like work ethic, promptness, and the ability to follow direction would be very useful metrics."
Work ethic, promptness and ability to follow directions are not just what the military looks for, it's what employers look for.
Like it or not, the world is based on social interaction so behavior and attitude are very important if you want to succeed. The people that get ahead not only do the technical aspect of their jobs well, they interact well with others.
If you want your kids to be prepared for the REAL world, not just the ideal world of academics, you should consider behavior into your grade because it sure as heck will be factored into their performance reviews.
Education systems are totally disgusting.
Thomas Edison, who acquired over 1,000 patents in his name, was kicked out of school by his teacher, Reverend Engle, who referred to him as "addled". Albert Einstein, who dropped out of high school per the advice of a teacher, was considered too dumb to enter the Swiss Federal Polytechnic in Zurich. Michael Faraday, who without much formal education was the best experimental scientist who ever lived. Albert Einstein kept a picture of MichaelnFaraday on his study wall alongside pictures of Sir Isaac Newton and James Clerk Maxwell. Can anybody here describe the "Faraday Effect"?
Those who can, do; those who can't, teach (and throw geniuses out of class).
We pay basketball players $25 million a year or 300 times what we pay a good scientist.
Academic grades should rate academic performances and not social behavior. A genius may spend 5 minutes to learn and rest of the time goof-off. Many intellectuals throughout history are eccentrics or even downright jerks. But they make huge contributions to our society.
It's ridiculous for those liberals on the left to inject into academic performances with all those nonsense.
If you want to educate and grade social behavior and social skills, then create such classes: boot camps, community services, missions, etc., and grade students properly for those classes.
And we all think that our kids are little geniuses that have got everything figured out. They will just succeed. As long as they can log on to Facebook and Twitter and Google.
Who does this benefit? Doesn't the policy hurt the kids that are struggling and need the "soft" extra points to get a high grade? Kids that have good study habits and learning skills will continue to get good grades. Won't this create a bigger divide between the kids that have learned how to learn, and those that are still figuring it out? Perhaps, that's the point of the policy. Reward the kids that learned the material. Yes/No?
It actually benefits struggling kids. They get 2nd chances to complete work and/or demonstrate their knowledge. In the historical school system, they'd get an "F" and move on to the next topic. After a few "F"s they might just give up. Now there's incentive to keep at it. No "free" A's or inflation...just a 2nd chance to do work and get credit.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Bailey Park
- Blossom Valley
- Castro City
- Cuesta Park
- Jackson Park
- Monta Loma
- North Bayshore
- North Whisman
- Old Mountain View
- Rengstorff Park
- Rex Manor
- Shoreline West
- St. Francis Acres
- Stierlin Estates
- Sylvan Park
- The Crossings
- Waverly Park
- Whisman Station
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,068 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 28 comments | 2,069 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,432 views
Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 12 comments | 920 views
The Opposite of What You Don't Want
By Caroline Fleck | 0 comments | 409 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Mountain View
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
© 2015 Mountain View Online
All rights reserved.