Sign up for Express
New from the Voice, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Mountain View, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   ELECTIONS
  MOVIES OTHER ISSUES   RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS
  SPORTS   BIKE FUN   EDITOR'S DESK   EXTRA!CREDIT
  GOOGLE WATCH   HEY TECH!   KIDS IN TOW   PANTHER PEN
  SILICON AND SYNAPSE   TRIP TALK

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
High-speed-rail critics eye fresh legal challenges
Other Issues, posted by Editor, Mountain View Voice Online, on Apr 14, 2012 at 5:14 pm

As state officials prepare to approve the environmental analysis for California's planned high-speed-rail system, Mountain View's neighboring cities are again gearing up to challenge the legality of the $68 billion project.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, April 12, 2012, 10:33 AM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Martin Engel, a resident of another community, on Apr 14, 2012 at 5:14 pm

The High-Speed Rail Authority and Caltrain are brilliant. Not at designing great rail transit for California, but brilliant at snookering the public, including all of us.

When the CHSRA threatened to build a four-track elevated viaduct, those of us along the Caltrain corridor became all upset and for good reason; it would wreak havoc along the Peninsula, through 17 towns and cities. It was really bad news.

So, those clever rascals, including Simitian, Eshoo and Gordon said, wait. We will ask for only two tracks, not four and no elevated viaducts. We will call this the “blended system.” That way, high-speed rail and Caltrain will share two tracks. Won’t that be much better?

Wow, what an improvement over the disaster with which we were threatened. Now it would only be a little disaster, not a huge one. They would electrify and that’s all. No harm done.

Wrong!

Please note that now we are fighting over this. We want the rail authority to not look at four track viaducts any longer. We want that “blended system.”

They won! We are now busy fighting FOR high-speed rail on the corridor. “Blended”guarantees a HSR foot-print on the corridor.

The only reason the rail authority and Caltrain will agree to the “blended” system is because it is temporary; that is, they will do this on an interim basis until additional funding materializes from the federal government.

The real reason they are not going to build the four track viaducts is because they don't have the money anyhow. But, when they do get more funds, watch out; here come those four track viaducts. And those are exactly what both the rail authority and Caltrain always wanted.

Of course, they are not telling us that.

And, instead of telling HSR to go to hell and never appear, in any form, on the corridor, we are now actually seeking it. How stupid is that?!


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

mv-voice.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.