Town Square

Post a New Topic

Meeting: Little outcry over rise in cancer near toxic site

Original post made on Dec 4, 2012

Despite sensational TV news coverage, a rise in the number of people living near Mountain View's toxic sites with non-Hodgkin lymphoma did not result in much anger, panic or concern in a recent meeting.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 4, 2012, 1:50 PM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by jane
a resident of North Whisman
on Dec 4, 2012 at 5:10 pm

What is so very frustrating about the report from the cancer registry is that even thought there were almost double the cases of cancer that would be statistically expected, there is no data provided as to where (i.e. the street) those 31 residents lived or where they worked. In theory, they all could have lived on Walker Drive, which would be significant. Or they all could have worked at the same company or on base and not live anywhere near where exposure to TCE could have happened. So knowing that there were 31 cancer cases of a specific type when 17 were expected is very frustrating. From the data there is no way to prove or disprove that these were TCE-related cancers. It would be valuable to know more specifics because, although these may have been totally random or coincidental, again, without knowing more about the locations, how long they lived there, where they may have worked, we cannot come to any conclusion.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dr. Collateral
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Dec 4, 2012 at 5:36 pm

Dr. Collateral is a registered user.

@jane: my guess is that HIPAA restrictions may prevent release of data that would essentially identify the patients, but that's just a guess.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Old Ben
a resident of Shoreline West
on Dec 5, 2012 at 7:11 am

The only verified environmental cause of cancer is second-hand cigarette smoke. Everybody knows that, right?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Map Was Available
a resident of Cuernavaca
on Dec 5, 2012 at 8:50 am

I just always figured it was inevitable; just as soon as they were allowed to build those houses over the known plume. Really sad.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Steve Williams
a resident of another community
on Dec 5, 2012 at 12:28 pm

Notes and audio (34 minutes) of the presentation and Q&A are available here:

Web Link

It's quite interesting: The limitations of the data used in a study like this make it very difficult to clearly identify a spike, much less its cause. In particular, the study considered patients who lived in the area when they were diagnosed. Many of those patients may have spent much of their time at work in another area. If their disease was caused by an exposure, it may have occurred at work.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Don't fund the rape culture at my alma mater
By Jessica T | 37 comments | 3,038 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,615 views

I am Grateful for Love
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,267 views