Propositions offer terrible choices
Original post made on May 18, 2009
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, May 1, 2009, 12:00 AM
on May 18, 2009 at 8:08 pm
After reading the Voice's editorial on the special election, I watched the League of Women Voter's guide to the propositions on Channel 15. All I can say is "wow, we spend almost 50% of the State's general fund on education?" Look at the product we're getting! Since teacher's are not paid that much, where is all the money going?
PS The Voice erred in reporting on Prop 1A. The tax increase on income is across the board--not the top tax brackets. Either the Voice or the LWV is wrong on that point.
on May 18, 2009 at 9:57 pm
NO on everything except 1F.
on May 18, 2009 at 10:27 pm
"1C makes changes to improve performance of the state lottery and to increase payouts and proceeds."
I know I'm late to the party on this one, but I really don't like this measure. If it were just a bond or just a measure that severed the lottery's connection to education, it would probably be bad enough. But it's much worse than that. "Improv[ing] performance of the state lottery" really means trying to get people to gamble more. It's far too 1984 for my tastes.