District may evict preschool, use space for high-risk teens
Original post made on Feb 18, 2012
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, February 17, 2012, 12:00 AM
on Feb 18, 2012 at 11:41 am
I understand the problems of having a high school across the street -- I have lived across from MVHS for 8 years. However, the high school was very much there when I bought my property, and as such, I was aware of the challenges that comes with this location. To think that there are no downsides to living near ANY school is to have your head in the sand.
I'm not keen on having Terra Bella move across the street, and I am very saddened that the preschool is being shut out. However, SCCOE closed the Terra Bella location, no doubt because of funding issues. MVLA has to find some place to relocate, and they are not exactly flush either. This is a sad -- but very typical -- chain of events in our public school systems. And as always, the disenfranchised youth are shunted about.
Now, let's talk about these kids. Twenty of them. There are already about 170 'at risk' kids at Alta Vista, right next door, which, by the way, is also a 'continuation' school. Yes, the kids at Terra Bella are even more 'high risk' -- but they have also made the CHOICE to go to school. Trust me, they don't have to make that choice, even if judges and truant officers and school districts try to 'make' them. I think that counts for something.
Finally, let's talk about MVLA. They have been wonderful neighbors. Anytime I have ever had any issues with trash, unsafe driving, parking illegally, they have been on it. The principal at AV takes a very serious and active role in making sure his charges do not run amuck in the neighborhood, and has instilled very strict 'must leave by' policies for the students. They simply are not allowed to mill around the school afterhours -- they must leave the area. I have no doubt that an additional 20 kids can be shepherded in the same fashion.
And about OUR schools. MVHS is a wonderful school. We are so lucky to have it in our neighborhood. My son absolutely flourished there, and I anticipate that my daughter will also have a great high school experience there. While I may be lucky in that neither of my children have had emotional or economic challenges that have caused them to run afoul of the typical school career and childhood, I also know many kids who have not been so lucky. And some of them come from families just like mine.
We must take care of all of our children. It's the right thing to do.
on Feb 20, 2012 at 9:25 am
We are in the same situation- We weren't oblivious to the idea that we should consider there may problems or issues that could potentially come from living in such proximity to a high school. But let's be real about the students they are proposing to add to the mix on Bryant Avenue. This is a group of extremely troubled kids who are known to engage in "HIGH risk" behavior and activities, a different category, and whole new level in school terms than "At-risk".
I also believe we must take care of all of our children. I have served as a mentor to at-risk, high-risk, troubled, emotionally challenged, economically challenged ..you name the term- Whatever words the system wants to use to label them. I have been a CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocate) worker for the Santa Clara County foster care system. I look forward to continuing this work. I am not a person who doesn't have compassion for the welfare of all students. We do not ask the district to lock the door over at the Terra Bella site and say "Have a nice life" to the kids. We ask that they find a suitable and appropriate alternate location. To us, this does not translate to a place where "Traditional" high school students (Mountain View High), "Alternative" high school students (Alta Vista High) and preschool kids and families (Mtn View Parent Nursery School) kids are being educated every day.
And regarding the day to day activities of the students at the school. I stay home during the day, and I absolutely DO see students in the neighborhood. At all times of the day. Before school, mid morning, lunch time, and after school. Again, I expected nothing else when I moved into a house that was close to a high school so this is not a complaint, just a reality check. I have called the police on 2 separate occasions, one when a very large group of students were clustered near the edge of the street, taking turns throwing each other into oncoming traffic when the cars reached a certain point on the road. Some form of "chicken" ? Another time when I found a student huddled behind my car in my driveway- He seemed to be hiding and ran off when I asked him if he was ok. A couple of weeks ago I was inside making my coffee when I heard a commotion so loud I went outside to make sure nothing serious was wrong. It seemed to be a mother or guardian of a boy who was trailing a boy up and down the street in her car (he was on foot) and yelling at him about smoking and skipping school. He finally stopped walking and stood in the middle of the street while she stayed in the car. They were literally screaming at each other for 5 minutes. On another occasion I helped a girl jump start her car which was parked on our street and had broken down. She came in the house and I let her use my phone. Our neighbors have told us that they once found a group of kids in their back yard. Less than 3 months ago I was called a MILF and offered a joint by a boy in a group of kids who were walking by. I laughed it off despite the rudeness of this term and told them to get back to class, since I didn't actually see anything... I will stop here since I could go on and on with examples. My point is, we can't say the high school students do not "mill around" the neighborhood. The fact is that they do.
We have no idea what type of or frequency of interactions this new student population will have with the community. Do we want to take the risk to wait and find out? Absolutely not. Please help us come up with alternative locations for these students who absolutely do deserve our compassion and help and another chance, etc. But let's not jeopardize the safety and well being of our other students. Not to mention the peace of mind of the surrounding community and neighborhood.
on Feb 20, 2012 at 2:45 pm
I find it disheartening that one of the Santa Clara County Board of Education Members, Craig Mann, made the following comment about this story in the Mercury News (Palo Alto Daily):
The Santa Clara County Office of Education is NOT, repeat NOT pulling the plug on Terra Bella. We have been subsidizing the lease to the tune of $150,000 per year for the local districts use. We can not afford to continue this subsidy. The local district(s) should they choose can continue the program, but they have to pay their own lease costs. This is the simple, plain truth.
Member, Santa Clara County Board of Education
(link to original quote below)
That being said, isn't it curious that the President of the MVLA Board, Faillace, says to the paper (and not before parents started asking questions at the board meeting) that they don't want to close Parent Observation, and *perhaps* the program could find another space. In three months, when parents are making decisions for what to do next year, after it took LAPP over one whole year to relocate their program.
The MVLA Board should have had other options on their list.
They know full well what they are doing. They are not being honest to the community.
I suspect that SCCOE will continue to run Terra Bella as they currently are if the participating districts (MVLA, PAUSD, & FUHSD) chip in for rent. I know all districts are strapped for cash, but how would turning one program into three separate programs in three separate locations save money?
Thank you to all the parents who are standing up for Parent Observation and working to help both programs.
To Phil Faillace, how can you stand to disrupt the Parent Observation program for no reason? How is it cheaper to move two programs than one? Oh, wait, you are not helping the Parent Observation program, are you. "They" can figure it out on their own. And how disrespectful to say you could have put it to a vote that night...the other board members did not seem ready to vote.