Bullis passes on litigation 'pause'
Original post made on Mar 8, 2013
Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, March 7, 2013, 9:47 PM
on Mar 8, 2013 at 11:51 am
As Goines stated, there was a tentative framework which was agreed upon by a subset of the respective boards. Both sides knew that nothing would be finalized until a public review and a final board vote (from both sides), so for Moore to state that LASD "walked away from the agreement" is both deceitful and inflammatory.
In fact, my understanding is that LASD presented a modified structure which BCS then "walked away from".
on Mar 8, 2013 at 2:51 pm
[Post removed due to disrespectful comment or offensive language]
on Mar 8, 2013 at 4:05 pm
When Mr. Moore says "BCS paused litigation last year at this same time and spent months in mediation talks only to have LASD walk from the agreement within two weeks of jointly announcing the deal," does he mean that BCS formally put existing cases on hold? Or does he mean that BCS simply delayed filing new actions? I think most people would not interpret delaying the filing of new actions as "pausing litigation," and this is the first I've heard that they put cases on hold last year.