Women of Silicon Valley: You May Be Lonely, But You're Not Alone | Mind Matters | Caroline Fleck | Mountain View Online |

Local Blogs

Mind Matters

By Caroline Fleck

E-mail Caroline Fleck

About this blog: I am a clinical psychologist, mother, and wife committed to using my life to help the lives of those around me. In addition to seeing clients in my private practice, I contribute to various training and research initiatives in cli...  (More)

View all posts from Caroline Fleck

Women of Silicon Valley: You May Be Lonely, But You're Not Alone

Uploaded: Jul 12, 2015
"I don't have any close female friends," "I used to have friends, but now I don't. And I feel like there's something wrong with me." "I know it sounds selfish, but it feels vital for me to have more than just "mommy friends." I want something to talk about other than just my kids."

Statements like these are so common among the women I see in my practice, I've come to expect them. This past week alone, I found myself having the same conversation with four different women. Each was concerned about her lack of close friendships and the anxiety, distress, and loneliness she experienced as a result. Each seemed relieved by my assurance that this was a common experience and not necessarily indicative of any deep seated or unresolvable problems.

What's interesting is that, although I speak to an equal number of men and women in my practice each week, men rarely raise concerns about friendships. That doesn't mean they don't have these concerns. Simply that they don't typically raise them in session.

So it's possible that this is a common experience for both men and women, and I suspect it is to some extent. I also wonder if there isn't more to the puzzle here. In part because we've seen this phenomenon in psychiatry before. Not with women reporting a lack of female friends per se, but with women expressing discontent with societal shifts and concern that, because they are lonely or distressed, there's something wrong with them. In the past, psychiatry often seemed quick to reinforce these notions by creating diagnoses and treating women for conditions that seemed to reflect societal, rather than personal, problems.

Freud, for instance, popularized the diagnosis of " female hysteria" based on the women he "treated." He used this term to describe women who reported symptoms of nervousness, insomnia, shortness of breath, and an increased desire for sex. Additionally, Freud suggested that the hysterical woman is unable to establish mature relationships and often uses her hysterical behavior for "secondary advantages." In hindsight, Freud's diagnosis appears wildly off base - female hysteria is no longer a diagnosis recognized by the American Psychological Association and many critics have since accused Freud of pathologizing women's reactions to sexual and societal oppression.

The 60s and 70s showed a similar trend in psychiatry with the rise of minor tranquilizers (primarily Valium, which was introduced in 1963) that were disproportionately prescribed to women. Valium was popularly referred to as "mother's little helper" in a song by The Rolling Stones and it fast became the intervention of choice for doctors treating women distressed by motherhood, singledom, and everything in between.

Generally speaking, I think it's always concerning when people from a specific demographic (in this case women) report being less than fulfilled by their lives in very similar ways. Given the history above, I find it particularly disturbing when women seem concerned that their reactions to their environment necessarily reflect psychological problems rather than normal reactions to a stressful situation.

Rather than "what's wrong with me," a better question might be, "what is it about today's society, and Silicon Valley specifically (I heard similar concerns from women in my practice in Seattle, but to a much lesser degree) that might explain this phenomenon?" I see plenty of explanations for why women, particularly those in Silicon Valley, are feeling lonely, isolated, and potentially dissatisfied. And none of them have anything to do with their character or mental health:

1. Many who live in and around the Bay have moved here from somewhere else. The families and school friendships that might serve as a person's social network are not immediately available.

2. The Valley is an international hotspot, not just a national one. Only a handful of my clients are native to the United States, much less California. U.S. culture places a much lower value on socialization than many other cultures in which community, friendships, and extended family are prioritized alongside if not above work.

3. The San Francisco Bay Area has more people between the ages of 25 and 39 than just about anywhere in the country. As such, many women in Silicon Valley are of childbearing age. It's not surprising that these women often find themselves homebound or struggling to find other women with whom to connect.

4. Young families today, particularly those trying to afford the cost of living in the Bay, often require the income of two parents. Again, a young mother who is juggling breastfeeding, daycare, and a full-time job isn't likely to have tons of opportunities to make friends. If she recently moved here from another state or country, her chances are even slimmer.

So does it make sense that women report feeling isolated and alone in our community? Of course! Does this mean that they are ungrateful, selfish, or failing to fit in? Not at all. Feeling isolated from others can certainly increase symptoms of anxiety and depression, but a lack of close friends is not an indication of mental illness.
What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Reader, a resident of another community,
on Jul 15, 2015 at 11:56 am

"U.S. culture places a much lower value on socialization than many other cultures in which community, friendships, and extended family are prioritized alongside if not above work."

Great comment. Perhaps this has contributed to what I think is the apparent rise of character disorders in the U.S. during the last 30 or so years?

Two thoughts: I think, American women in general tend not to support each other. Also, women of childbearing age are territorial.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Honey B, a resident of Martens-Carmelita,
on Jul 25, 2017 at 10:01 am

Thanks Caroline to make me feel and surrounded by the people like you. You just said absolutely right. We are not alone unless the people around us is so grateful. Web Link THANKS


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Why is it becoming increasingly impossible to open a restaurant on the Peninsula?
By Elena Kadvany | 27 comments | 4,911 views

Electric Buses: A case study
By Sherry Listgarten | 2 comments | 2,107 views

Helping Partners Become Couples (vs. Helping Couples Become Partners)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 224 views

 

PRICE INCREASES MONDAY

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Register now