Couples: All People Are Difficult, But You Shouldn’t Be Too Difficult | Couple's Net | Chandrama Anderson | Mountain View Online |

Local Blogs

Couple's Net

By Chandrama Anderson

E-mail Chandrama Anderson

About this blog: About this blog: I am a LMFT specializing in couples counseling and grief and have lived in Silicon Valley since 1969. I'm the president of Connect2 Marriage Counseling. I worked in high-tech at Apple, Stanford University, and in ...  (More)

View all posts from Chandrama Anderson

Couples: All People Are Difficult, But You Shouldn’t Be Too Difficult

Uploaded: Dec 21, 2018
The following article is written by Stan Tatkin, PsyD, MFT. He is the founder of PACT, Psychobiological Approach to Couple Therapy. Most of our Connect2 therapists have trained in PACT, as well as other couple therapy modalities. I thought this particular article was very important, so I'm sharing it with you.

"All People Are Difficult, But You Shouldn’t Be Too Difficult

As a couple therapist, I know how difficult people can be. Actually, as a person on this planet and a romantic partner to my wife, Tracey, I count myself as one of those difficult people. Indeed, in no way do I put myself above any of the other annoying people out there. Yet here I am, writing about how to be less of a pain in the ass. Well, while I know I can be difficult, I know how not to be too difficult. And the line between them is actually clearer than you might think. Here’s how not to cross it.

When I work with couples, our goal is for them to become secure functioning. Secure functioning partners are least difficult with and toward each other. That’s because they understand their purpose: To ensure each other’s absolute, unequivocal sense of safety and security. Partners are equal stakeholders in this endeavor, therefore, they agree to make life easier for each other, not harder. That’s one of the main principles of secure functioning relationships.

Oh, wait, you think you’re not difficult? Let me tell you, you are. Here’s why:

Your brain. Though a very impressive organ, your brain is prone to lots of errors, especially in social situations. For example,
Your brain all too often conflates social cues (faces, voices, movements, postures, words, and phrases) with real danger.
Your brain is mostly automatic, memory-based, and therefore confuses current events with previous experience via a lightning fast memory and recognition system.
Your brain constantly replaces missing evidence with made up “facts.”
Your brain imagines things that are not there.
Your biology. Your development plays a considerable role in how difficult you are. Your biology affects your ability to:
Manage your impulses.
Tolerate frustration.
Shift your attention at will.
Manage your state of arousal.
Socially-emotionally act and react appropriately under stress.
Make decisions.
Override what feels good for what does good.
Remain self-aware in real time.
Nature. You are genetically predisposed as a homo sapien to be aggressive, self-interested, and prone to dislike people who are “too familiar to ignore, but too different to tolerate.”1
Nurture. Your experiences and memories shape who you become. If you experienced any trauma, especially in early childhood that remains unresolved, you are likely to be hyper-reactive to threat cues, both internally and externally.
This is not an exhaustive list. The ways to be difficult are limitless. However, that you and I are difficult is not a problem. It’s when we cross the line and become too difficult, that is the problem. How does focusing on secure functioning help?

Secure functioning partners co-create their own kind of social contract which protects them from each other. These are “golden rules” in that they are, if agreed upon, undisputable and therefore help partners rein in difficult behavior.

One golden rule could (and should) be, “We protect each other in public.” Keri and Dave, for example, agreed to this principle. They both decided that it served both a personal and mutual good. In the example below, they are out to dinner with another couple. Dave is an actor and he received news that he won a co-starring role in a major motion picture. He told Keri that he signed a non-disclosure agreement and to keep it to herself.

Keri: [to the other couple The other night Dave got news that he’s doing the next (fill in the blank).

Dave: [turns his head away in anger

Keri: What? [raising her shoulders and hands in a disdainful, questioning manner

Dave: [quietly in her ear Remember what I told you earlier. Don’t talk about this.

Keri: [out loud Oh come on. It’s great news. I’m proud of you.

At this point, Keri has stepped over the line and has become too difficult. That she reflexively said something that he explicitly told her not to say breaks an agreed upon principle. However, that she continued to violate the principle when reminded by Dave – that is what defines being too difficult. It also shifts Dave’s experience of Keri from annoying to threatening.

Here’s how it should have gone:

Keri: [to the other couple The other night Dave got news that he’s doing the next (fill in the blank).

Dave: [turns his head away in anger

Keri: [covering her mouth in horror, turns to Dave I’m so sorry. I forgot. I’m so sorry, really I am. [to the other couple I just betrayed Dave by telling you that. [back to Dave I am so very sorry I did that.

Dave: [to couple I’m under an NDA so no one is supposed to know this. Keri’s very excited for me about this. Please, keep this to yourselves.

Keri: [whispers in Dave’s ear I’m so sorry.

Now that is an example of repair and recognition of being difficult.

Other examples of being too difficult include:

Persistently not releasing your partner after a satisfactory repair.
Not being willing to bargain with your partner.
When bargaining, not providing alternatives following the word “no.”
Being unwilling to admit your wrongs and make amends.
Being unwilling to see your partner’s point of view.
Not being curious.
Persistently stubborn.
Persistently inflexible.
Persistently conflict avoidant.
Continually failing to check with your partner when discussing them in public.
Continually disregarding your partner when together in public.
Persistently (and unapologetically) failing to keep your word.
Persistently talking too much.
Persistently talking too little.
Again, this is by no means a definitive list. But notice the wording in here. It’s not about reflexively doing something that makes you difficult for your partner. It’s about the refusal to stop when cued that makes you too difficult. It’s also about the refusal to repair the hurt and makes things right.

We are all fundamentally automatic creatures – all day, every day. Our brain cannot possibly remember the countless changes in behavior our partners require under various circumstances. That’s why telling your partner to never again embarrass you in public, while understandable, can never work. Your partner will do something again, and likely without any malicious intent. It will be far more effective to remind your partner just before entering a public situation. “When we go in, please don’t make any jokes at my cost, okay?” If your partner is not too difficult, they will comply. If they don’t, well, now you have a problem. If they slip (which should not happen), and remain unapologetic, it’s likely time to move on.

Because we are all mostly automatic, we shouldn’t be faulted for many of the knee-jerk behaviors we do without thought and, at times, without intention. We are, however, responsible for what we do after we do something stupid, thoughtless, or insensitive. We are all difficult in one way or another. The challenge for secure functioning couples is in not crossing the line to becoming too difficult."

NOTES:

Harari, Yuval Noah. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (p. 18). HarperCollins. Kindle Edition.
What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

 +   1 person likes this
Posted by NathanielShoemaker, a resident of Deer Oaks/Twelve Oaks,
on Dec 24, 2018 at 4:14 am

NathanielShoemaker is a registered user.

Studying the characters of people, we begin to understand how a difficult person sees himself and others. If we understand their point of view, it becomes easier for us to explain our behavior to ourselves. This approach underlies the method of cognitive therapy, which is based on the fact that our attitude to the world and people, like our behavior, is determined by a number of fundamental beliefs acquired in early childhood. For example, for a paranoid person, a principled conviction is most likely formed in this way: “Others want to hurt me, they cannot be trusted." From this logically follows a whole set of manifestations of suspicion and actions dictated by hostility.

When we say that “difficult" people need to be accepted as they are, it often causes disapproval and objections. How is this possible if they behave unacceptably? In fact, we do not urge you to passivity, which gives a difficult person the opportunity to harm you (and often herself). You just need to accept the fact of its existence as a human being. But this should not prevent you from defending against it when you learn how to do it. Difficult personalities are like rain or wind: they have existed and will always exist. To resent this is the same as resenting the law of universal aggression or bad weather. No matter how grieved you are that she has become spoiled, you will not be outraged, but you will find another occupation together for a long-awaited walk.

Difficult people did not choose the fate of difficult personalities. The combination of heredity and education determines their behavior, which primarily harms them and for which they most likely cannot be fully responsible. Who of his own volition would want to become too anxious, too suspicious, or too dependent on others? Most of all, problem people need sympathy, because no one suffers from their character more than they themselves.

Thanks for the post, respect to the author.



 +  Like this comment
Posted by Dating profile, a resident of Adobe-Meadow,
on Mar 7, 2019 at 6:12 am

Dating profile is a registered user.

As said daughter, and subsequently her sister, got old enough enough to understand what was being asked, my answers changed.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by The Single Sibling, a resident of Adobe-Meadow,
on Mar 7, 2019 at 6:12 am

The Single Sibling is a registered user.

I could no longer answer on my own, I had to model appropriate answers for them.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Su Hong Palo Alto's last day of business will be Sept. 29
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 5,195 views

Premarital, Women Over 50 Do Get Married
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,351 views

Natural Wines?
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 1,330 views

Electric Buses: A case study
By Sherry Listgarten | 2 comments | 1,099 views

 

Register now!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

More Info