Breaking the News: How MediaNews is causing a seismic shift in Bay Area newspapers

Many observers are sounding an alarm about the cost to our society of the diminishing number of diverse voices and declining quality of journalism. Some are offering radically different visions for the future of journalism:

* Professor John McManus of San Jose State University believes newspapers are the "nervous system of democracy," and that the decline of newspapers and news coverage is a civic version of the debilitating disease ALS, leading to a paralyzed democracy.

* Sonoma State's Peter Phillips argues that "media consolidation is creating a new form of censorship in the United States and undermining democracy in the process."

* Stanford professor Ted Glasser says it's time to consider entirely new models; we should stop saying we have to accept the realities of the marketplace. He says we need to ask a different question: What kind of journalism do we need and what kind of conditions do we need to sustain it?

Rupert Murdoch's purchase of the Wall Street Journal garnered much national attention recently, but we in the Bay Area are truly at ground zero for the developments that have prompted fears about newspaper consolidation.

The Bay Area media landscape has changed fundamentally in just the last couple of years, and the dominant player on the scene is Dean Singleton's MediaNews. Only two years ago the major daily papers in the Bay Area were the San Francisco Chronicle, San Jose Mercury News and Contra Costa Times (the Chron being owned by the Hearst Corporation, the latter two owned by Knight Ridder). Meanwhile, Denver-based MediaNews owned most of the smaller dailies in the Bay Area: The Oakland Tribune, Tri-Valley Herald, San Mateo County Times, Fremont Argus and others.

In this climate, Bay Area newspapers actually competed with each other for news coverage and advertising. There weren't as many independent voices as, say, 20 or 30 years ago, but there was still vigorous competition.

Then in 2006, Knight Ridder, under pressure from stockholders, sold its Bay Area properties. The deal resulted in almost every daily newspaper in the Bay Area -- including the Mercury News and the Palo Alto Daily News chain -- being owned by MediaNews.

Today there are 31 MediaNews daily newspapers in Northern California alone, and that doesn't include the weeklies it owns in the same area.

Its holdings in Southern California are also extensive. In total, the company owns 57 daily newspapers and some 120 non-daily publications in 13 states. It is the fourth-largest newspaper company in the country.

John Bowman, former executive editor of the San Mateo County Times, has this to say about MediaNews's entry into the Bay Area: "They're way past the point of diminishing returns, of penny-wise and pound-foolish. ... Thin staffs provide less volume of news, less investigative and less enterprise stories. ... Copy desks are so thinly staffed that they are making an incredible number of errors. These errors are in the headlines and [photo captions so they are glaring. They are the kind of errors that destroy our credibility."

Faced with the prospect of deteriorating news quality, Bowman submitted his resignation after a 31-year career in the news business.

The one remaining major Bay Area paper not a part of MediaNews is the Chronicle. However, the Hearst Corporation contributed $300 million to help finance the Knight Ridder/MediaNews deal (via middleman McClatchy Publishing Company) and in return received a 30 percent interest in non-Bay Area holdings of MediaNews. Hearst and MediaNews have been discussing consolidating and cooperating in various operations, but were put on hold pending an antitrust lawsuit filed by former San Francisco political consultant Clint Reilly. The suit, which challenged the unprecedented consolidation, was settled shortly before trial last spring.

Dan Fost, who spent nearly a decade as a Chronicle media columnist, decided to leave the paper in August to become a freelance journalist. He says the Chronicle staff never could figure out why Hearst would subsidize Singleton's purchase of the Mercury News and Contra Costa Times, and wonders whether the Reilly lawsuit prevented a consolidation of the Chronicle into the same media empire.

Fost believes there is still a lot of talent at the Chronicle, which has been directed by editor Phil Bronstein to focus more on journalistic crusades to solve civic ills and on "master narratives," such as "Green Living," that cut across the Bay Area and to which almost any story can be tied. Fost observes that Singleton is clearly excited by the prospect of being able to sell the whole Bay Area in one ad buy, but laments that "newsrooms always get the worst of the deal." What makes him the saddest is that, on the whole, there are fewer people in journalism holding fewer people accountable -- which can't be healthy for our society and our democracy.

UC Berkeley law professor Stephen Barnett says it's "shameful that the U.S. Justice Department has walked away" from applying antitrust laws to the Bay Area consolidation. He says there are many other cities with examples of newspaper consolidation, but he can't think of any other area of similar size where the consolidation extends so far beyond the central city through the suburbs. He notes that "enforcement of antitrust laws is generally weak, and it has been super weak for newspapers because of their political clout."

And then there was one

Neil Henry, a journalism professor at UC Berkeley and author of "American Carnival: Journalism under Siege in an Age of New Media," says the Bay Area has suffered more than most areas, and that when fewer and fewer organizations own and deliver the news, it can't help but be harmful for democracy.

What we need is a variety of sources, he says, pointing out that when the region had a dozen independently owned papers covering a major story, there might be a dozen perspectives. Now, with MediaNews, they only need one reporter covering the story.

Henry covered Africa for the Washington Post between 1989 and 1993 using telexes and a 15mm camera. In those days all major television networks had bureaus in Africa, as did major newspapers and news services. Today there is no American television or cable network based on the continent, he says. Coverage is limited to the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and some news services that can be counted on one hand.

Henry says society is experiencing a paradox: wonderful new tools and a dazzling array of information available on the Internet, but those who contribute the substance -- journalists -- are dwindling and endangered.

Award-winning media critic Ted Glasser says the Bay Area's media consolidation is emblematic of a larger problem and leads to three things: fewer journalists, homogenization of coverage (with the same story appearing in multiple newspapers), and poor media coverage of journalism itself.

Glasser says the picture is not improving and the farther we head down this path the more the story needs to be covered -- and the less it is. That's the paradox.

Don't expect Bay Area daily newspapers, virtually all of which are a part of the deal, to make much of an effort to cover it -- which is exactly the nature of the problem it raises.

Return to "Breaking the News" main page



Like this comment
Posted by Jon Wiener
a resident of another community
on Jan 2, 2008 at 11:01 am

I hope you guys get the irony in running an op-ed from an EPC-owned paper in Marin County decrying media consolidation in the Bay Area.

Like this comment
Posted by Don Frances
Mountain View Voice Editor
on Jan 2, 2008 at 2:04 pm

Don Frances is a registered user.

As you should know, EPC is the last independently owned newspaper chain in the Bay Area. We are six small-to-medium weeklies -- not part of MediaNews, Hearst, or some other conglomerate.

Would you have preferred we didn't run it?

Like this comment
Posted by joe segura
a resident of another community
on Jan 2, 2008 at 6:25 pm

Nice article on a critically serious issue.
You write about the problem of only one reporter writing about a breaking story, instead of several writers from a variety of news organizations. The problem is compounded when one editorial opposing or supporting an issue/candidate is used by a politico alleging widespread views of various publications when it only belongs to one of Dean Singleton clusters "news" papers.

Like this comment
Posted by Mike Laursen
a resident of Monta Loma
on Jan 2, 2008 at 11:02 pm

The key to the trend is in the paragraph where John Bowman criticizes the MediaNews editorial standards. How is it that MediaNews is putting out a crappy product, in Chapman's opinion, but gaining market share doing so? Has the readership that cares about quality news migrated to other sources, perhaps non-traditional sources on the Internet? Have declining literacy and growing anti-intellectualism led to a decline in the number of readers who care about quality journalism? Is it possible that there never was as much interest in quality news as journalists think there was?

Understanding the readers, and delivering what they want is the key, not looking to the government for protection from competition. The cure of giving politicians the power to decide who gets to own the newspapers is worse than the disease. It tromps all over the First Amendment.

Like this comment
Posted by Jon Wiener
a resident of another community
on Jan 3, 2008 at 12:21 pm


I was just saying that it is ironic. I'm not clear, though, on the point at which EPC becomes a conglomerate. Both the Voice and the Sun used to be truly independent before EPC bought them.

I would have preferred that the Voice had written it instead, in a way that discussed the real consequences for Mountain View. It might lead to an answer to the question Mike seems to be implying: Is quality journalism worth paying for? With advertising continuing to migrate on-line, I think we either need to do a better job of convincing people that it is, or make a serious committed to publicly-funded news organizations.

Like this comment
Posted by Jon Wiener
a resident of another community
on Jan 3, 2008 at 12:45 pm

*serious commitment*

Like this comment
Posted by Mike Laursen
a resident of Monta Loma
on Jan 3, 2008 at 12:50 pm

I wouldn't put it that way. For some people, quality journalism is definitely worth paying for. My point is that, now that we have the Internet, there may not be enough readers who want quality journalism and want it delivered in the form of a traditional daily newspaper to sustain the traditional daily newspaper business.

I would also assert that "Publicly-funded" is equivalent to "politically-controlled". IRather than having to compete with media conglomerates that you feel own too many outlets and have poor journalistic standards, you will be competing with newspapers sponsored by taxpayer money with politicians acting as the editors. That's a scary place to go for a country that is supposed to have freedom of the press.

Like this comment
Posted by Don Frances
Mountain View Voice Editor
on Jan 5, 2008 at 6:27 pm

Don Frances is a registered user.

Jon: I guess I see what you mean by ironic. Of course, small community weeklies like ours usually don't work on such stories. Given that, it seems like an even deeper irony that we're the last newspaper outlet around in a position to even print something about it!

As for whether we're a conglomerate, I don't know the exact definition of that word in this sense. I think of a "conglomerate" as a mega-corporation like MediaNews, which we obviously aren't.

Mike: Intuitively, I share your worry about publicly funded (and therefore government-contolled, maybe), media. On the other hand, PBS, led by Bill Moyers, is seriously a last bastion of decent, quality journalism on television -- there is simply no one else doing what he and Frontline, et. al., do. (The closest thing might be "60 Minues.") I for one am glad we're dedicating that tiny sliver of tax money to them. So I'm not sure what that says about the merits (or hazards) of publicly funded media.

Like this comment
Posted by Mike Laursen
a resident of Monta Loma
on Jan 6, 2008 at 10:13 pm

Frontline is an interesting example to bring up. I'm not sure they are tax funded at all. On their webpage it says that their main sources of funding are PBS viewers, the MacArthur Foundation, and the Park Foundation.

Like this comment
Posted by eric
a resident of another community
on Jan 7, 2008 at 4:21 pm

"Publicly funded" is highly misleading. More accurate to call PBS "publicly subsidized". "Government controlled"-- even with the caveat you tossed in-- is an unreasonable and unfair comment to make without backup.

Like this comment
Posted by Daniel DeBolt
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jan 8, 2008 at 1:46 pm

Daniel DeBolt is a registered user.

It's worth pointing out that both the BBC and Al Jazeera, top news outlets for the rest of the world, are funded by national governments while enjoying editorial freedom.

Like this comment
Posted by Jon Wiener
a resident of another community
on Jan 10, 2008 at 9:33 am


Glad you brought up Al Jazeera. I didn't want to be the one accused of being anti-American.

Tell your boss that he has better things to do on his vacation other than post on Time Square.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Truckee cafe to expand to Menlo Park
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,555 views

Attraction to a Person Outside Your Relationship
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 749 views


Top restaurants to check out

Mountain View Voice readers have officially decided. See which local restaurants and businesses can now claim the title — Best Of Mountain View 2017.

View Winners