Council rejects permit request for 291 Evandale | News | Mountain View Online |


Council rejects permit request for 291 Evandale

Unanimous vote 'effectively a condemnation' of decrepit Summerhill apartment complex

In another chapter of the ongoing drama over 291 Evandale Ave., the City Council on Tuesday rejected the owner's attempt to re-roof the run-down apartment complex there, which has stood vacant with blue tarps covering leaky roofs ever since a redevelopment plan failed almost two years ago.

Paul Hogan, attorney for Summerhill Apartments owner Sal Teresi, argued that the city's ordinances allow a re-roofing permit for the building because it is not receiving major changes to the exterior, and because the site is not undergoing a change in land use.

But due to a long list of code violations, safety issues and neighborhood concerns about the complex, city staffers say, Teresi needs to go through an unusual discretionary requirement -- a several-week-long "design review process" -- before any permits are issued.

The council voted unanimously against Teresi's appeal for the re-roofing permit, including member John Inks, a self-described "property rights purist," who said the council's action could be seen as "effectively a condemnation" of the building.

"Not allowing us to make repairs is not helpful to anyone," Hogan said at the meeting. The city's ordinances do not apply, he said, because "This is not a new building, this is not a change in land use and this is not a change to the exterior. Your ordinance doesn't say you have to go through design review if the neighborhood has concerns."

City attorney Michael Martello disagreed.

"Under their theory they could rebuild the entire complex" without any oversight, Martello said. Before the city preemptively shut the complex's water off and stopped work orders, city staff observed workers at the complex last year doing unapproved work on the buildings so people could move back in, with workers camping out at the complex in the process, said zoning administrator Peter Gilli in a staff report.

"Staff was concerned people would start occupying an uninhabitable building," Gilli wrote.

Gilli reports that there are "life safety issues" there, such as illegal exterior water heater sheds mounted in spaces formerly used as exits and walkways.

The property has been up for sale since last year, and several buyers reportedly have expressed interest -- only to pull out after seeing how much work the complex needs.

Last year the city reported that "numerous structures have rodent infestation, insect hives along with dry rot and signs of termite destruction. ... Numerous units lack working bathroom fixtures, kitchen appliances, lighting fixtures and heating devices." Other problems reported by city staff include the "presence of rank odor," likely from a broken sewer line, broken concrete stairs and metal guardrails, missing smoke detectors, mold, unvented water heaters and numerous electrical violations.

"The majority of the neighborhood does not support rehabilitation of this property," said Lisa Matichak, president of the Wagon Wheel Neighborhood Association. "There are pages and pages of code violations." Residents in the neighborhood also claim that crime has gone down since the complex went vacant.

In 2006 the City Council approved a plan for 144 condos to replace the 64 apartments at the site, but that plan failed when the owner apparently could not get the loans required. Because the apartments were filled with some of the poorest families in the city, the city ended up spending $127,000 of its own funds to relocate 33 of the households.

Meanwhile, the city says Teresi still owes $87,950 in unpaid planning fees for the previous condo development plan, which spurred the council later that evening to change how city planning fees are collected.

Several other plans and permits would be required to make the building inhabitable, including a landscaping plan to address the complex's dead landscaping. Martello said it was best for the city to make sure all of that work would be done before money is spent on a new roof.

"To put a roof on with all the illegal changes made is just unacceptable," said council member Ronit Bryant.

In June the City Council rejected a plan from KDF Communities to renovate the apartment complex for affordable housing, saying they did not have enough information about what KDF would do to the buildings before the developer applied for $12 million in state bonds for the project.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


3 people like this
Posted by BB
a resident of North Whisman
on Oct 29, 2009 at 12:45 pm

Mr. Teresi has money to fix the roof but doesn't have money to pay $87,950 planning fees he owes the city?

3 people like this
Posted by Sue
a resident of Whisman Station
on Oct 29, 2009 at 2:24 pm

The council should take a field trip. People are living in the units even now.

3 people like this
Posted by Steve
a resident of Whisman Station
on Oct 29, 2009 at 4:09 pm

Why can I make a comment on an article relating to the Wagon Wheel Neighborhood Association, and yet cannot find WWNA in the pull-down menu of Neighborhoods?


3 people like this
Posted by QM
a resident of North Whisman
on Oct 29, 2009 at 6:14 pm

Sounds like Sal has to make another trip to the Home Depot for some new Tarps. Hey Sal, the blue ones are kind of ugly. Could you please put up green ones this time?


3 people like this
Posted by Old Ben
a resident of Shoreline West
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:57 am

Sal Teresi should be investigated. That property should be seized, it's a public health hazard.

3 people like this
Posted by QM
a resident of North Whisman
on Oct 30, 2009 at 8:58 am

To Mr. Paul Hogan, I bet the city will give you a demolishing permit if you asked for it.

3 people like this
Posted by sb
a resident of Whisman Station
on Nov 1, 2009 at 8:01 am

Sal has money for an attorney and a roof?

3 people like this
Posted by Milo
a resident of North Whisman
on Nov 1, 2009 at 8:02 am

Maybe he plans on using the illegal aliens that used to live there to put the new roof on.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Umami Burger calls it quits in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 9,413 views

Couples and Premarital : "Who we are . . . depends in part . . . on who we love."
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,729 views

Flying: How much is enough? It's personal.
By Sherry Listgarten | 11 comments | 2,295 views

Wait, wait – we’re working on it
By Diana Diamond | 15 comments | 1,629 views

My Pet Peeves
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 7 comments | 1,352 views


Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

View Details