Obama plan gives high speed rail $2.25 billion

Secretary of Transportation says stimulus will help bring about 'new era in transportation'

U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood joined Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer in Washington Thursday to announce the granting of $2.25 billion in stimulus money for the state's high-speed rail project.

The money is part of $8 billion awarded to states across the country as part of President Obama's plan to develop a nationwide network of high-speed rail service.

In October, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger submitted an application for $4.7 billion in federal stimulus funds, and the state was awarded roughly half of that total.

Along with the $2.25 billion for the high-speed rail project, California also is receiving $23 million for four new station tracks at San Jose's Diridon Station, $51 million for work on the Amtrak corridor in San Diego, and $20 million to fund upgrades to trains' emissions control equipment.

LaHood said the money will help bring about "a new era in transportation," and compared it to the interstate highway system started by President Eisenhower more than a half-century ago.

"High-speed rail holds the same promise, and will create new jobs and a revitalized manufacturing base while reducing our dependence on oil and harmful emissions," he said.

Feinstein said she has pushed for high-speed rail in California as far back as when she ran for governor in 1990. Twenty years later, she said, "it's finally, finally, finally going to happen."

She said the new funds for the project will translate into tens of thousands of jobs for California, and "since unemployment rates have been skyrocketing, it's very, very welcome to us."

Groundbreaking on the project, for which voters approved $9.95 billion in bond money in November 2008, is expected in 2012.

Feinstein said the federal government will be negotiating with the California High-Speed Rail Authority on which portion of the project will receive the stimulus money first.

The Bay Area portion of the project has proven contentious, with some Peninsula cities and conservation groups challenging the rail authority's decision of the Pacheco Pass as the route for trains to enter the Bay Area from the Central Valley.

Unsurprisingly, local critics of the project take a dim view of the stimulus award.

"This is not good news," said Menlo Park resident Martin Engel in an e-mail. "They are clearly making progress toward their goal of construction on the Peninsula, and we already know what that will look like."

In December, the CHSRA board rescinded its approval of an environmental impact report on the section of the project between Gilroy and San Jose after an October court ruling that found its analysis was insufficient in terms of right-of-way issues on Union Pacific railroad tracks and the effects of vibrations on the area immediately surrounding the corridor.

The environmental review has to be completed by September 2011 to be eligible for the stimulus money.

The high-speed rail project would create an electrified system of bullet trains that would eventually run from Sacramento and San Francisco down to Los Angeles and San Diego.

Andrea Gemmet of The Almanac contributed to this report.


Like this comment
Posted by Reality
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jan 28, 2010 at 5:02 pm

As I stated at the HSR meeting in PA

Construct the links between LA and Sac, SF and SAC.

Let Caltrain electrify the rail between Gilroy and SF
Provide HSR stations to connect lower speed current rail service via rail throughout California

Add HSR new rails as the cost/benefit come to reality if it does.

The need for HRS on the Peninsula is not required if the above is approved. Stop caltrain crying they need HSR, they do not.

Like this comment
Posted by Mike Laursen
a resident of Monta Loma
on Jan 28, 2010 at 10:32 pm

Reality, if I recall correctly, the Proposition, as approved by the voters, dictates quite a bit about the route and where stops must be.

Like this comment
Posted by Cog
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jan 29, 2010 at 7:10 am

Mike Laursen


please disband the CHSRA

Like this comment
Posted by Steve
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jan 29, 2010 at 2:42 pm

Cuz the country really needs HSR and we just have such huge surpluses to spend on it. As for the argument that we are investing for the future: It's like funding home improvements with credit card debt.

Like this comment
Posted by Andrew
a resident of Shoreline West
on Jan 30, 2010 at 1:37 am

Caltrain supports Prop 1A and HSR because they also include a number of important improvements for local commuters such as converting the trains from oil/diesel to electricity and other modernizations. Some potential improvements here: Web Link

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 11 comments | 3,524 views

Eat, Surf, Love
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,182 views

Couples: So You Married Mom or Dad . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,138 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 797 views