News

Historic home all yours -- if you move it

City's second oldest house in the way of senior project on Calderon

Try as they might, a group of seniors who want to build communal housing at 445 Calderon Avenue say it is not economically feasible to design their 19-unit condo complex around the 1880s house in the middle of the large lot. Instead of demolishing it, they are hoping to find a new address for the Victorian farmhouse known as the Bakotich house.

Susan Burwen, who is organizing the co-housing effort with her husband David, secured the 1.3 acres adjacent to Landels Elementary School last year with the help of investors. Now Susan Burwen says their architect, co-housing guru Charles Durrett, has come up with 30 designs for the project, but none were able to incorporate the 19-unit condo building and the 1,700-square-foot-home, even if moved to a different part of the property.

A house from another era

As it sits now, the Bakotich house is nice enough that its current tenants say they wished they could stay longer than the year and half they agreed to. It was built in the 1880s and hasn't been changed much since then. Though it appears to have been maintained, Burwen said it will likely need new plumbing and electrical, among other things.

Nick Perry, author of numerous articles on Mountain View history, once wrote that visiting the orchard-encompassed Victorian farmhouse "is like stepping into another era." It is widely believed to be the city's second oldest house after the 1867 Rengstorff House, which was moved to Shoreline Park and lovingly restored.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

The house was last owned by Anne Bakotich, who died in 2007. Her family had lived in the home since the 1920s and it was sold last year to divide the value among Bakotich's nine nieces and grandchildren. It is still surrounded by walnut trees, remnants of the orchards that once covered the entire neighborhood.

While it is relatively plain inside, City Council member Jac Siegel said it is a "nice example" of a farmhouse of the era. If found to be the only way to save it, Siegel said he would be willing to support moving the house in any way possible, even if it means using some city resources or waiving city permit fees.

The costs

A company that specializes in moving large structures estimated the cost of moving the Bakotich home between $40,000 and $60,000. Jana Trost of Trost Jacking and Heavy Moving said that does not include the cost of a new foundation, and charges by utility companies to move any utility lines that may be in the way. Some have found it cheaper to simply remove a home's roof to gain clearance if the roof is higher than about 18 feet, Trost said.

Even with all those expenses adding up, it appears that moving the house may be a bargain compared to building a new home, which can easily cost more than $600,000.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Burwen said her group may be willing to pay the house's buyer some money to move it away.

The goal

Burwen said she and her husband enjoyed living on a commune during the 1960s and wanted to pursue the project even before learning that "senior co-housing" was an existing phenomenon, with numerous senior co-housing communities throughout the country and architects who specialize in it.

Life in the proposed co-housing development would revolve around a 4,000-square-foot common house where people get their mail and use a common kitchen, media room, crafts room and a workshop, among other things.

A third possibility

While it could be demolished or moved, there is also a third option for the house, which is to leave it on the site and possibly move it to a different spot. Zoning administrator Peter Gilli warned that the city is "trying to find ways to encourage the house to be part of the project."

Siegel said that was also his favorite option.

But making room for the house somewhere on the site may reduce the size of the condo building, spreading the cost more thickly among buyers. Everyone agrees that the project is already expensive, with an underground parking garage and an elevator pushing up prices, which range from $750,000 for a 1,370-square-foot unit to $1.25 million for a 2,050-square-foot unit.

"That's the critical issue," Gilli said. "If it becomes so expensive that they can't attract buyers the whole project stops."

More information about the project is available online.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Historic home all yours -- if you move it

City's second oldest house in the way of senior project on Calderon

by / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Wed, Jun 16, 2010, 1:44 pm

Try as they might, a group of seniors who want to build communal housing at 445 Calderon Avenue say it is not economically feasible to design their 19-unit condo complex around the 1880s house in the middle of the large lot. Instead of demolishing it, they are hoping to find a new address for the Victorian farmhouse known as the Bakotich house.

Susan Burwen, who is organizing the co-housing effort with her husband David, secured the 1.3 acres adjacent to Landels Elementary School last year with the help of investors. Now Susan Burwen says their architect, co-housing guru Charles Durrett, has come up with 30 designs for the project, but none were able to incorporate the 19-unit condo building and the 1,700-square-foot-home, even if moved to a different part of the property.

A house from another era

As it sits now, the Bakotich house is nice enough that its current tenants say they wished they could stay longer than the year and half they agreed to. It was built in the 1880s and hasn't been changed much since then. Though it appears to have been maintained, Burwen said it will likely need new plumbing and electrical, among other things.

Nick Perry, author of numerous articles on Mountain View history, once wrote that visiting the orchard-encompassed Victorian farmhouse "is like stepping into another era." It is widely believed to be the city's second oldest house after the 1867 Rengstorff House, which was moved to Shoreline Park and lovingly restored.

The house was last owned by Anne Bakotich, who died in 2007. Her family had lived in the home since the 1920s and it was sold last year to divide the value among Bakotich's nine nieces and grandchildren. It is still surrounded by walnut trees, remnants of the orchards that once covered the entire neighborhood.

While it is relatively plain inside, City Council member Jac Siegel said it is a "nice example" of a farmhouse of the era. If found to be the only way to save it, Siegel said he would be willing to support moving the house in any way possible, even if it means using some city resources or waiving city permit fees.

The costs

A company that specializes in moving large structures estimated the cost of moving the Bakotich home between $40,000 and $60,000. Jana Trost of Trost Jacking and Heavy Moving said that does not include the cost of a new foundation, and charges by utility companies to move any utility lines that may be in the way. Some have found it cheaper to simply remove a home's roof to gain clearance if the roof is higher than about 18 feet, Trost said.

Even with all those expenses adding up, it appears that moving the house may be a bargain compared to building a new home, which can easily cost more than $600,000.

Burwen said her group may be willing to pay the house's buyer some money to move it away.

The goal

Burwen said she and her husband enjoyed living on a commune during the 1960s and wanted to pursue the project even before learning that "senior co-housing" was an existing phenomenon, with numerous senior co-housing communities throughout the country and architects who specialize in it.

Life in the proposed co-housing development would revolve around a 4,000-square-foot common house where people get their mail and use a common kitchen, media room, crafts room and a workshop, among other things.

A third possibility

While it could be demolished or moved, there is also a third option for the house, which is to leave it on the site and possibly move it to a different spot. Zoning administrator Peter Gilli warned that the city is "trying to find ways to encourage the house to be part of the project."

Siegel said that was also his favorite option.

But making room for the house somewhere on the site may reduce the size of the condo building, spreading the cost more thickly among buyers. Everyone agrees that the project is already expensive, with an underground parking garage and an elevator pushing up prices, which range from $750,000 for a 1,370-square-foot unit to $1.25 million for a 2,050-square-foot unit.

"That's the critical issue," Gilli said. "If it becomes so expensive that they can't attract buyers the whole project stops."

More information about the project is available online.

Comments

Jes' Sayin'
Blossom Valley
on Jun 16, 2010 at 3:22 pm
Jes' Sayin', Blossom Valley
on Jun 16, 2010 at 3:22 pm
3 people like this

Can't help but wonder if this project really needs to be in downtown Mountain View. Aren't the residents going to spend most of their time on the property itself? Maybe this large a project would be more easily and economically located in the open spaces of Milpitas, Pleasanton or Fremont?


Garrett
another community
on Jun 16, 2010 at 8:18 pm
Garrett, another community
on Jun 16, 2010 at 8:18 pm
3 people like this

A great place for this project, close to about everything you need, the is more for active seniors. Downtown seems to me is getting a mix of residents.


Wondering
Waverly Park
on Jun 17, 2010 at 11:13 am
Wondering, Waverly Park
on Jun 17, 2010 at 11:13 am
3 people like this

The title of the article is about the historic house, but none of the 5 pictures shows that house. I hope they can find a way to preserve one of Mountain View's oldest houses.


Seer
Blossom Valley
on Jun 17, 2010 at 2:46 pm
Seer, Blossom Valley
on Jun 17, 2010 at 2:46 pm
3 people like this

It's so simple: put the house up for sale. If nobody wants it, then it must have zero value, so therefore the concern about preserving it is misplaced. We may have an emotional attachment to the past, but if it can't be expressed as a desire to pay to have it preserved, then it can't be all that strong. I know there are laws about preserving historic houses, so of course this will have to go before the planning commission. However, the fact remains that is nobody wants it, it isn't wanted!

When I become a senior I certainly don't want to be relegated to some backwoods place away from contact with society just for the convenience of others who think of me as being disposable. Instead, like these seniors, I'd like to be part of a community and contribute, which means being located in the core of the community.


Reyna
Willowgate
on Jun 17, 2010 at 5:18 pm
Reyna, Willowgate
on Jun 17, 2010 at 5:18 pm
3 people like this

Seer:

If you have no monetary value when you're a senior, then I guess we'll just have to get rid of you. We have such emotional attachments to the past and old people anyway.


Bruce Karney
Old Mountain View
on Jun 17, 2010 at 6:30 pm
Bruce Karney, Old Mountain View
on Jun 17, 2010 at 6:30 pm
3 people like this

I would love it if the historic Bakotich home were moved to the vacant lot across from our home at Bush and Yosemite. Our 4-block tract was not developed until the 1940's, so an 1880's home would look unusual, but we're only 3 blocks from Castro St. and there are very few vacant R1-zoned lots near downtown.

I believe the lot is owned by the two sisters who own the "Pumpkin Patch" property at Grant and Levin. If anyone knows them personally, please share the suggestion with them.


Alan
The Crossings
on Jun 17, 2010 at 6:40 pm
Alan, The Crossings
on Jun 17, 2010 at 6:40 pm
3 people like this

There's just nothing better than telling other people how to spend their money or use their property.

Turn the tables, and I bet you'll have different suggestions.


Susan Burwen
Old Mountain View
on Jun 20, 2010 at 10:25 am
Susan Burwen, Old Mountain View
on Jun 20, 2010 at 10:25 am
3 people like this

I would like to add some information. Although the house represents an example of a simple farmhouse built for the orchard farming economy of the early 20th century, other homes in Mountain View and in nearby cities of Santa Clara Valley date from this time period as well.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.