Council OKs study of 1,500 homes near Google | News | Mountain View Online |

News

Council OKs study of 1,500 homes near Google

 

The City Council unanimously voted to study potential changes to the city's general plan on Tuesday, including the possibility of allowing 1,500 homes in the neighborhood near Google headquarters.

Council members had expressed reservations about allowing homes among the office buildings of North Bayshore, as new residents there could protest. Google's workplace services director Dan Hoffman said he supported studying the idea.

"If you don't study the options, you won't have any options," said City Manager Kevin Duggan.

Potential changes city-wide include doubling the density allowed along portions of El Camino Real and office buildings in the Whisman and North Bay Shore areas, and encouraging the revamp of the city's neighborhood shopping centers.

Resident Joan MacDonald said she was concerned that new general plan policies did not do enough to encourage subsidized affordable housing.

The council decided not to label the Francia family's orchard on Whisman Road as a community facility after concerns were expressed that it would look like a "taking," despite the neighborhood support for a park there.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

3 people like this
Posted by OMVer
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Dec 13, 2010 at 3:00 pm

I think we are generally going in the right direction with this General Plan update. During the visioning process, many residents expressed the desire to see Mountain View become a 'city of villages' - and the policies summarized here (which have been discussed & described much more in meetings the past few months) would get us closer to that point.

Putting some homes near our largest concentration of jobs would make North Bayshore a more self-sufficient 'village'. And putting a reasonable amount of new growth in targeted areas near shopping and services (like El Camino) would make these more complete as well. Better to put growth in these areas than squeeze it into the middle of our single-family neighborhoods.


3 people like this
Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Dec 13, 2010 at 3:08 pm

I attended the meeting and noted to the council that, because of current Shoreline District tax diversions, not $1 extra would go toward school district operations. Until that situation is fixed, by either statue change (wake up Assemblyman Paul Fong), or judicial change, I think many concerned with school financing would oppose more residents down there. This would only increase the disparity in per pupil revenue between Los Altos and Mountain View elementary education.


3 people like this
Posted by MV Mom
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Dec 13, 2010 at 6:16 pm

That would be an insane mistake to not funnel those tax revenues towards schools. That area of Mountain View has no school, and the current schools would not be able to support a large increase in the number of students. A new elementary school would definitely have to be built and with any development. Or maybe re-open Whisman school.


3 people like this
Posted by Kristine
a resident of Monta Loma
on Dec 13, 2010 at 7:47 pm

Couldn't they separate part where their planning this development apart from the rest of bayshore taxwise?


3 people like this
Posted by MV Resident
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Dec 14, 2010 at 12:40 pm

This would be great if they made these house affordable for people who don't work at Google!


3 people like this
Posted by Thom
a resident of Jackson Park
on Dec 14, 2010 at 3:12 pm

Why not just change the name of my city to 'Google View' I've never seen a city kiss more corporate butt in my life. What's going to happen when the evil Google decides it's time to move? Remember Silicon Graphics? How about Sun Microsystems? These issues with Google should be put up for a vote by citizens of Mountain View. This council doesn't have your best interest. How many people have been asking for school assistance? We don't need new housing and the council needs to listen to people that live in this city alone.


3 people like this
Posted by Hardin
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Dec 16, 2010 at 9:23 am

Actually, there are a lot of benefits for Mountain View if Googler's and other workers who work in shoreline commercial area live in the vicinity. Living close to work reduces the carbon footprint and relieves congestion. If/when Google does leave Mountain View, the arrangement of having housing close to commercial spaces with intentional planning will be attractive to businesses and future residents alike, and serves as a stable tax base for the city.

Developing local infrastructure so that work/live/play can be accomplished more locally is a good thing, and a better balance than what we currently have.


3 people like this
Posted by "Just Think About It"
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Dec 16, 2010 at 12:58 pm

The city isn't concerned about adding tax revenue from this development for our schools. Google will start their own charter school and will not concern themselves with the rest of the cities schools......Do you people think they are going to bus their kids across highway 101.
................"JUST THINK ABOUT IT".............


3 people like this
Posted by "JUST THINK ABOUT IT"
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Dec 16, 2010 at 1:03 pm

How many of these houses are going to qualify as "Low Income Housing Units"???????????????????????????????????


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Umami Burger calls it quits in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 9,424 views

Couples and Premarital : "Who we are . . . depends in part . . . on who we love."
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,739 views

Flying: How much is enough? It's personal.
By Sherry Listgarten | 11 comments | 2,303 views

Wait, wait – we’re working on it
By Diana Diamond | 14 comments | 1,653 views

My Pet Peeves
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 7 comments | 1,363 views

 

Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

View Details