New role for former city manager

Kevin Duggan chairs board overseeing shutdown of redevelopment agency

There's a new group of government officials making decisions in Mountain View, and it has a very long name: the Downtown Revitalization Authority Successor Agency Oversight Committee. Go ahead, say it fast 10 times.

The new board has some familiar faces, including Kevin Duggan, Mountain View's former city manager, who retired last year after 20 years on the job.

The group of county, school, city and water district officials has been directed to oversee the state-ordered shutdown of Mountain View's downtown redevelopment agency. The City Council created the agency in 1969 to use downtown property taxes almost exclusively to pay for downtown redevelopment: building facades, street improvements and business recruitment, among other things.

"If anybody knows Mountain View's revitalization district, it's Kevin," said Mayor Mike Kasperzak, who appointed Duggan to the board.

"The respect he's earned from others in the community" is another reason for the choice, he said.

After retiring a year ago, Duggan is back at city hall for the board's monthly meetings on Monday mornings, and, as he likes to joke, restraining himself from advising new City Manager Daniel Rich. He was elected chair at the board's first meeting on April 2, in which the board learned about its role under state law.

"I'm very familiar with the Revitalization Authority, that part is pretty straight-forward," Duggan said. "However, state law has created a process somewhat complicated, some would say convoluted. All of us are learning how exactly it's supposed to operate and how to implement its goals."

The biggest challenge for the board may be deciding what to do with the Revitalization Authority's assets, including at least $5.5 million in unspent funds and six downtown properties totaling an acre, which are worth $5 million and were assembled for redevelopment starting in 1989. Such decisions could pit the city against the other taxing agencies who might want all the assets to go towards boosting tax revenues.

In other communities "these boards have become somewhat contentious and somewhat adversarial," Duggan said. "But I'm very confident that it's going to be a collaborative process. We all want Santa Clara County to be a better place for people to live and work. My sense is people will be focused on that objective."

Duggan also gave his perspective on the downtown properties: "Those properties were strategically acquired over the last 10-20 years to allow some important redevelopment downtown." An important decision will hinge on the board's answer to this question: "Is there some way to allow these properties to be part of an overall development plan versus sold off piecemeal?"

The board members serve as volunteers and will not be compensated. In fact, they are prohibited from being paid by state law, Duggan said.

The board's seven members were appointed by various agencies under the new law, and include mayoral appointee Ellis Berns, the Mountain View economic development director; California Community College District appointee and Mountain View-Los Altos High School District associate Superintendent Joe White; county Board of Education appointee and Mountain View-Whisman School District Superintendent Craig Goldman; Santa Clara Valley Water District appointee and Water District board chair Linda LeZotte; county Board of Supervisors appointee and county Controller-Treasurer Irene Lui; and finally, county Board of Supervisors appointee Alan Minato, the county finance agency division manager.


Like this comment
Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:20 am

Daniel, good story. There are also alternates to the first appointments. Of particular interest to me is Superintendent Barry Groves of the high school district, who is the alternate schools representative. When I first talked to Groves about five years ago concerning the tax diversion 'problems' of redevelopment districts, his last departing question to me was 'when will we start to get Castro Strret taxes'? I guess we'll start to see that answer quickly!
Although closing Castro Street redevelopment did not have many 'vocal' supporters at that time, it was eventually closed by the actions of our local Legislative representatives Fong, Alquist, and Simitian supporting Gov. Brown.
Castro redevelopment only diverted 1/10 of the school and county taxes as the Shoreline District now does. Shoreline District will need "special legislation" to close it (along with the remaining half dozen or so special RDAs in the state). I hope more citizens will join me in being 'vocal' about sunsetting the Shoreline redevelopment district!

Like this comment
Posted by Rex
a resident of Rex Manor
on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:38 pm

I Respectfully disagree with closing the Shoreline District because it provides funds for a number of city projects that benefit the citizens more than it would the school district. For example: the water main replacement project that ran up Miramonte; Stevens Creek Trail expansion; flood protection for Shoreline; re-routing of the water main for CSMA & San Antonio Center; etc., etc. Any project that can be tied back to Shoreline is eligible to use these funds.

The schools need to reorganize and become effective and efficient rather than always requesting funds.

Like this comment
Posted by Bruce Karney
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:56 pm

I look forward to reading more about the progress of this group and hope that The Voice will give its readers notice of when the meetings will occur so residents can hear what's going on.

The story says the DRA's assets are at least $10.5 M. How large are its liabilities?

Like this comment
Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:49 pm

Bruce, check the Mountain View City website for this information. It's posted prominently.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Coffeebar opens in Menlo Park
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 5,204 views

Couples: So You Married Mom or Dad . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 815 views

Spring College Fairs
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 774 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 0 comments | 291 views