Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Spurred by a swelling number of commuters, Caltrain plans to bolster its weekday service by adding six trains and having more existing trains stop in Palo Alto.

The proposal, which Caltrain presented to Palo Alto’s City Council Rail Committee Thursday afternoon, June 7, would raise the number of weekday trains from 86 to 92. This includes adding two trains in the afternoon peak hours and restoring four “shoulder peak” trains that were suspended in 2011 when the agency was wrestling with budget cuts. These trains run at the tail end of the morning rush and before the busy afternoon hours.

Two of these limited-stop shoulder-peak trains would depart San Francisco at 9:37 a.m. and 2:37 p.m. The other two would depart San Jose at 9:33 a.m. and 2:33 p.m., according to Caltrain.

The proposal, which the agency’s board of directors is tentatively scheduled to vote on next month, would also add an additional stop to 12 existing trains. Six of these would stop at Palo Alto’s downtown station and six others would stop in Sunnyvale. The new stops would add about two minutes to a trip on the baby-bullet train.

The changes were prompted by a surge of ridership at the popular train service. According to Caltrain statistics, the number of riders jumped from 37,779 in February 2011 to 42,354 in February 2012, a 12.1 percent jump. Jayme Ackmann, Caltrain’s government affairs officer, said many of the existing trains currently operate near or beyond capacity. In many cases, riders stand in the trains’ vestibules or in aisles. The high number of bicyclists also adds to the congestion.

“We have to bump bicyclists more and more frequently because there’s not enough spaces to carry their bicycles,” Ackemann told the committee.

The Palo Alto committee was generally supportive of the proposal, though it urged Caltrain to take a closer look at another part of Palo Alto — the Caltrain stop at California Avenue. While the University Avenue stop is the second-busiest station on Caltrain’s line and will likely continue to get the bulk of service increases, city officials argued that the California Avenue stop is increasingly important because of its proximity to Stanford Research Park, residential neighborhoods and the California Avenue Business District.

Ackemann also said Thursday that Caltrain’s service changes aim to accommodate riders from the technology community, many of who work different hours than typical work commuters. Many of these riders were not satisfied with Caltrain’s service levels during peak hours.

“We’re adding stops to several of our express trains to further accommodate some of the ridership increase we’ve seen,” she said.

Gennady Sheyner covers local and regional politics, housing, transportation and other topics for the Palo Alto Weekly, Palo Alto Online and their sister publications. He has won awards for his coverage...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. I am glad I am able to work from home instead of commuting by car or the overcrowded trains. its horrible. There is an explosive growth of population of people living in this area and people moving in from other parts of the country and world without substantial improvement in infrastructure. The Valley used to be a nice place to work and had good quality of life before the dotcom boom and that boom has destroyed everything and the current boom is destroying the peace and quite that I used to enjoy. Rents are skyrocketing and grocery stores, gyms,restaurants,etc..are all overcrowded. terrible.

  2. Funny, I walk and drive around the same city as the poster above and I don’t see it as the poster above, I see a city that is generally doing well econoically and is still a very desirable place to live. The healthy crowds I see on Castro Street or at our shopping centers to me is a sign of a strong business climate, which I appreciate when I read about how weak the economy is in most of the rest of the country. And on those occasions when I might take the train and it’s got a good number of people on it, I see that as a sign that people find it an attractive option to get work done, listen to music, or relax on their commutes.

    I suppose it’s all in how you view it, but I guess I really don’t think the sky is falling. Quite the contrary, in fact.

  3. Funny how juniperk complains of overcrowding, yet lives in one of the high density developments that contributed to this supposed overcrowding….

Leave a comment