News

Blind date robbers strike again

For second time, man expecting to meet date gets robbed instead

For the second time in two days, a pair of robbers lured two out-of-town men into a lurid trap.

Around 10 p.m. on May 29, a man was robbed of $2,000 at gun- and knife-point in the 600 block of Tyrella Avenue -- in front of the same apartment complex where a man was robbed just after midnight on May 28 in a very similar fashion, according to Sgt. Sean Thompson, public information officer for the Mountain View Police Department.

Both men had come to meet a would-be date -- whom they had met online -- at the Tyrella Avenue apartment complex. Both had been told to bring $2,000, Thompson said. In the first victim's case, he told police he and his date had made plans to spread the cash over the bed before having sex.

Whatever the agreed-upon reason for bringing the cash, both men -- the first, a 22-year-old from San Jose; the second, a 30-year-old from Sunnyvale -- never saw the woman, according to Thompson.

Instead, in both cases, while waiting outside the apartment complex, the men were approached from behind by two men who held them up with a gun and a knife and stole their cash, Thompson said. In the case of the 30-year-old man, the men also stole a gold ring and an iPhone.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

The robbers were described as Hispanic men in their mid-20s, about 5-feet-7-inches tall and weighing about 150 pounds.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Blind date robbers strike again

For second time, man expecting to meet date gets robbed instead

by / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Fri, May 31, 2013, 11:22 am

For the second time in two days, a pair of robbers lured two out-of-town men into a lurid trap.

Around 10 p.m. on May 29, a man was robbed of $2,000 at gun- and knife-point in the 600 block of Tyrella Avenue -- in front of the same apartment complex where a man was robbed just after midnight on May 28 in a very similar fashion, according to Sgt. Sean Thompson, public information officer for the Mountain View Police Department.

Both men had come to meet a would-be date -- whom they had met online -- at the Tyrella Avenue apartment complex. Both had been told to bring $2,000, Thompson said. In the first victim's case, he told police he and his date had made plans to spread the cash over the bed before having sex.

Whatever the agreed-upon reason for bringing the cash, both men -- the first, a 22-year-old from San Jose; the second, a 30-year-old from Sunnyvale -- never saw the woman, according to Thompson.

Instead, in both cases, while waiting outside the apartment complex, the men were approached from behind by two men who held them up with a gun and a knife and stole their cash, Thompson said. In the case of the 30-year-old man, the men also stole a gold ring and an iPhone.

The robbers were described as Hispanic men in their mid-20s, about 5-feet-7-inches tall and weighing about 150 pounds.

Comments

Jay Park
Jackson Park
on May 31, 2013 at 11:29 am
Jay Park, Jackson Park
on May 31, 2013 at 11:29 am
3 people like this

Too bad these gullible johns don't read the Mountain View Voice, otherwise they would know it's a trap!


resident
Old Mountain View
on May 31, 2013 at 11:38 am
resident, Old Mountain View
on May 31, 2013 at 11:38 am
3 people like this

How about identifying the prostitution web site that these johns used to find these "women"?


Nick V
Registered user
Mountain View Voice Staff Writer
on May 31, 2013 at 11:59 am
Nick V, Mountain View Voice Staff Writer
Registered user
on May 31, 2013 at 11:59 am
3 people like this

The police are not releasing the name of the site.


Rocket scientist
Cuernavaca
on May 31, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Rocket scientist, Cuernavaca
on May 31, 2013 at 12:10 pm
3 people like this

Gee, do you think the woman doesn't exist?

Web Link


Jay Park
Jackson Park
on May 31, 2013 at 12:21 pm
Jay Park, Jackson Park
on May 31, 2013 at 12:21 pm
3 people like this

@resident:

If the police reveal the name of the website, they probably damage their chances at nabbing the perpetrators.

It's reasonable to assume that they known the website's URL and are monitoring it. There's a possibility to run a sting operation to see if they can bag these guys. Note that an online prostitution site would probably affect other nearby cities as well; the various local law enforcement departments share information as most criminals do not restrict their activities within a specific town's city limits.


Tara
St. Francis Acres
on May 31, 2013 at 2:04 pm
Tara, St. Francis Acres
on May 31, 2013 at 2:04 pm
3 people like this

You get what you paid for. These idiots wanted to get screwed, and they did!


GSB
Rex Manor
on May 31, 2013 at 2:08 pm
GSB, Rex Manor
on May 31, 2013 at 2:08 pm
3 people like this

The story in the Palo Alo Daily Post mentioned the website. Said it's called Badoo.com


guerno
Castro City
on May 31, 2013 at 2:19 pm
guerno, Castro City
on May 31, 2013 at 2:19 pm
3 people like this

Maybe stake out that apartment complex.

Usually, thieves don't think outside the box and I wouldn't be surprised if one of them lives there.

Also, who are these people that are able to get $2,000 in cash? Even if I had that much money in my bank account, the ATM limit is $500 a day.

Also, police need to get the dating site and/or some IP addresses.

Good scam, I guess, but either really ballsy or really short-sighted to rob at the same place 2 nights in a row.


Ron
Waverly Park
on May 31, 2013 at 2:24 pm
Ron, Waverly Park
on May 31, 2013 at 2:24 pm
3 people like this

So it is not a prostitution site like people keep suggesting. If the PA Daily Post is correct, then it is a personals site, and could happen on ANY personals site or craigslist and such. Crimes like this happen every day from such sites (I am pretty cautious about sites like craigslist these days). Bottom line is, if a "girl" on a site says "meet me and bring money" you have to be gullible enough to fall for it.


Jay Park
Jackson Park
on May 31, 2013 at 3:09 pm
Jay Park, Jackson Park
on May 31, 2013 at 3:09 pm
3 people like this

@guerno:

The first john apparently appropriated ("borrowed") the $2000 from his employer.

Anyone who works in the restaurant business has fairly easy access to several grand in cash at closing time. Heck, at a good restaurant or bar, *one* server or bartender may finish his/her shift with hundreds in tips, cash.

Remember, a full Type 47 ABC license (beer, wine, hard alcohol) is a six-figure sum, you better make sure you're ringing in enough sales.

The day's cash would be stored in a safe in the manager's office. It's not like some assistant restaurant manager would make a bank deposit at 2am. Too dangerous.


Jay Park
Jackson Park
on May 31, 2013 at 3:09 pm
Jay Park, Jackson Park
on May 31, 2013 at 3:09 pm
3 people like this

@guerno:

The first john apparently appropriated ("borrowed") the $2000 from his employer.

Anyone who works in the restaurant business has fairly easy access to several grand in cash at closing time. Heck, at a good restaurant or bar, *one* server or bartender may finish his/her shift with hundreds in tips, cash.

Remember, a full Type 47 ABC license (beer, wine, hard alcohol) is a six-figure sum, you better make sure you're ringing in enough sales.

The day's cash would be stored in a safe in the manager's office. It's not like some assistant restaurant manager would make a bank deposit at 2am. Too dangerous.


[email protected]
Martens-Carmelita
on May 31, 2013 at 4:10 pm
[email protected], Martens-Carmelita
on May 31, 2013 at 4:10 pm
3 people like this

The first word that comes to mind re these "victims" is STUPID. 'nough said.


Otto Maddox
Monta Loma
on May 31, 2013 at 10:46 pm
Otto Maddox, Monta Loma
on May 31, 2013 at 10:46 pm
3 people like this

If I were dumb enough to fall for this I'd be way too embarrassed to report it to the police.

I'd take the loss and learn from my mistakes.


John
another community
on Jun 1, 2013 at 6:20 pm
John, another community
on Jun 1, 2013 at 6:20 pm
3 people like this

Hard to believe any John could be this STUPID!!!!!! I hope the next one shows up with Monopoly Money!


Steve
Sylvan Park
on Jun 3, 2013 at 7:16 am
Steve, Sylvan Park
on Jun 3, 2013 at 7:16 am
3 people like this

Excellent opportunity for a police sting operation! Hiring a prostitute is illegal, so the 'evidence' could be siezed. Way better than some silly traffic stop!


Write M. Hard
Cuernavaca
on Jun 3, 2013 at 4:26 pm
Write M. Hard, Cuernavaca
on Jun 3, 2013 at 4:26 pm
3 people like this

Nah, keep up the aggressive traffic patrols. The roads have finally calmed down now that drivers know they are in the cross hairs.
I guess that's why the police have a traffic division and a crimes division and a vice division: they can multi-task! Love them ticket writin' men in blue!


Name hidden
North Whisman

on May 24, 2017 at 11:41 am
Name hidden, North Whisman

on May 24, 2017 at 11:41 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Jackson Park

on May 25, 2017 at 2:40 pm
Name hidden, Jackson Park

on May 25, 2017 at 2:40 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Monta Loma

on May 25, 2017 at 5:17 pm
Name hidden, Monta Loma

on May 25, 2017 at 5:17 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Slater

on May 27, 2017 at 1:08 am
Name hidden, Slater

on May 27, 2017 at 1:08 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Monta Loma

on May 28, 2017 at 5:34 am
Name hidden, Monta Loma

on May 28, 2017 at 5:34 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Castro City

on May 28, 2017 at 8:00 am
Name hidden, Castro City

on May 28, 2017 at 8:00 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Gemello

on May 29, 2017 at 10:39 am
Name hidden, Gemello

on May 29, 2017 at 10:39 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Martens-Carmelita

on May 29, 2017 at 1:08 pm
Name hidden, Martens-Carmelita

on May 29, 2017 at 1:08 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Stierlin Estates

on Jun 3, 2017 at 12:31 am
Name hidden, Stierlin Estates

on Jun 3, 2017 at 12:31 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Gemello

on Jun 4, 2017 at 3:40 am
Name hidden, Gemello

on Jun 4, 2017 at 3:40 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Castro City

on Jun 6, 2017 at 3:58 am
Name hidden, Castro City

on Jun 6, 2017 at 3:58 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Gemello

on Jun 6, 2017 at 10:06 pm
Name hidden, Gemello

on Jun 6, 2017 at 10:06 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Stierlin Estates

on Jun 16, 2017 at 3:38 am
Name hidden, Stierlin Estates

on Jun 16, 2017 at 3:38 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
North Whisman

on Jun 16, 2017 at 10:37 am
Name hidden, North Whisman

on Jun 16, 2017 at 10:37 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Bailey Park

on Jun 16, 2017 at 10:53 am
Name hidden, Bailey Park

on Jun 16, 2017 at 10:53 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
another community

on Jun 16, 2017 at 2:36 pm
Name hidden, another community

on Jun 16, 2017 at 2:36 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
The Crossings

on Jun 16, 2017 at 6:15 pm
Name hidden, The Crossings

on Jun 16, 2017 at 6:15 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Whisman Station

on Jun 16, 2017 at 6:35 pm
Name hidden, Whisman Station

on Jun 16, 2017 at 6:35 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Waverly Park

on Jun 17, 2017 at 5:40 am
Name hidden, Waverly Park

on Jun 17, 2017 at 5:40 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
North Bayshore

on Jun 17, 2017 at 10:13 pm
Name hidden, North Bayshore

on Jun 17, 2017 at 10:13 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Monta Loma

on Jun 18, 2017 at 1:48 am
Name hidden, Monta Loma

on Jun 18, 2017 at 1:48 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
The Crossings

on Jun 18, 2017 at 5:26 am
Name hidden, The Crossings

on Jun 18, 2017 at 5:26 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Old Mountain View

on Jun 18, 2017 at 9:07 am
Name hidden, Old Mountain View

on Jun 18, 2017 at 9:07 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Shoreline West

on Jun 18, 2017 at 12:33 pm
Name hidden, Shoreline West

on Jun 18, 2017 at 12:33 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Rex Manor

on Jun 18, 2017 at 12:49 pm
Name hidden, Rex Manor

on Jun 18, 2017 at 12:49 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Willowgate

on Jun 19, 2017 at 12:16 am
Name hidden, Willowgate

on Jun 19, 2017 at 12:16 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
another community

on Jun 19, 2017 at 4:20 am
Name hidden, another community

on Jun 19, 2017 at 4:20 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Blossom Valley

on Jun 19, 2017 at 4:47 am
Name hidden, Blossom Valley

on Jun 19, 2017 at 4:47 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Martens-Carmelita

on Jun 19, 2017 at 3:11 pm
Name hidden, Martens-Carmelita

on Jun 19, 2017 at 3:11 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Jackson Park

on Jun 19, 2017 at 3:31 pm
Name hidden, Jackson Park

on Jun 19, 2017 at 3:31 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Gemello

on Jun 19, 2017 at 11:41 pm
Name hidden, Gemello

on Jun 19, 2017 at 11:41 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Bailey Park

on Jun 20, 2017 at 1:06 pm
Name hidden, Bailey Park

on Jun 20, 2017 at 1:06 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Slater

on Jun 20, 2017 at 5:28 pm
Name hidden, Slater

on Jun 20, 2017 at 5:28 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Castro City

on Jun 20, 2017 at 9:21 pm
Name hidden, Castro City

on Jun 20, 2017 at 9:21 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Blossom Valley

on Jun 21, 2017 at 1:35 am
Name hidden, Blossom Valley

on Jun 21, 2017 at 1:35 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
another community

on Jun 22, 2017 at 4:48 am
Name hidden, another community

on Jun 22, 2017 at 4:48 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Gemello

on Jun 22, 2017 at 5:08 am
Name hidden, Gemello

on Jun 22, 2017 at 5:08 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Jackson Park

on Jun 22, 2017 at 9:44 am
Name hidden, Jackson Park

on Jun 22, 2017 at 9:44 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Slater

on Jun 22, 2017 at 10:04 am
Name hidden, Slater

on Jun 22, 2017 at 10:04 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Stierlin Estates

on Jun 22, 2017 at 1:51 pm
Name hidden, Stierlin Estates

on Jun 22, 2017 at 1:51 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Sylvan Park

on Jun 22, 2017 at 5:56 pm
Name hidden, Sylvan Park

on Jun 22, 2017 at 5:56 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
North Whisman

on Jul 27, 2017 at 10:48 am
Name hidden, North Whisman

on Jul 27, 2017 at 10:48 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Name hidden
Stierlin Estates

on Jul 27, 2017 at 1:36 pm
Name hidden, Stierlin Estates

on Jul 27, 2017 at 1:36 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.