News

Civil rights group claims racial bias in MV high schools

MVLA administrators deny minority students are placed in lower-level math classes

A Bay Area civil rights advocacy group released a report late last month claiming the Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District is among several school districts in the area that disproportionately place minority students in lower-level math classes in ninth grade, leaving them behind their peers and reducing their chances of getting accepted into college.

A 37-page report by the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area (LCCR) found that Latino and African-American students are far more likely to get placed in algebra than their white and Asian peers, despite the fact that the students meet or exceed standards that would allow them to take geometry in their freshman year.

The civil rights group specifically points to the Mountain View-Los Altos district, where the 24 percent of Latinos and the 2 percent of African-Americans who make up the student body are "disproportionately" placed in algebra in their freshman year. The exact number of students affected was not provided in the report.

"The high numbers of minority students misplaced in algebra in ninth grade raises concerns of racial bias and discrimination in the placement process," the report states.

Superintendent Barry Groves said the district "vigorously denies" that it holds minority students back in ninth-grade math classes, and said he was perplexed that the LCCR didn't contact district. He said the group based its analysis on public records requests but did not release the more district-specific data it used to come to its conclusion.

"I am very incensed that they would publish this without ever talking with us, without ever asking if this makes sense. Nobody has ever contacted us at all," Groves said.

According to the report, the most common misplacement of African-American and Hispanic students in a math class happens when a student finishes algebra in middle school but is forced to repeat the course again in the first year of high school. The report says that the middle school grades and test scores of a number of these students are on par with their peers of other ethnic backgrounds.

Of the students surveyed in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties, 51 percent of Latino students and 53 percent of African- Americans took algebra in eighth grade, but only 16.5 percent of Latinos and 17.8 percent of African-Americans go on to take geometry in ninth grade -- substantially lower than their Asian and white peers.

Starting out behind means these students are not likely to reach higher-level math classes like calculus by their senior year, which can decrease their chances of getting accepted into a college or university after graduation, the report says. By missing out on higher-level math, students are also frozen out of highly valued jobs in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM), the report says.

LCCR member Dana Isaac said the advocacy group does a lot of work in the field of education, and was hearing stories from people who said they had been put in the wrong math class by their school district, oftentimes taking the exact same class in ninth grade that they had taken the year before. Whenever the issue is brought up at community forums, she said, someone in the audience "without fail" will always say he or she got stuck in the wrong class.

The issue is two-fold when minority students are held back, she said. They have to compete with a disadvantage when applying for highly competitive University of California schools, but it also has a psychological effect as well.

"On a personal, mental level, being held back is being told 'you are not good at math' and 'opportunities in math are not your strong suit," Isaac said.

While the problem is regional, Isaac said, it's important to focus on Mountain View-Los Altos because it's in the center of the tech industry -- right next door to Google -- which similarly lacks a strong minority presence. The nearby schools, she said, may be a contributing factor.

She said the district also has no written math placement policy, which means nothing ensures that students who pass algebra in middle school are headed for geometry in their freshman year.

In response to Groves' charge that the LCCR didn't contact the district before releasing its report, Isaac said the district was contacted in the sense that the LCCR was requesting the public records indicating how many students are being placed in what classes in their freshman year, and that the district was well aware the group was looking into the issue.

Associate Superintendent Brigitte Sarraf, who said she was "appalled" by the claims in the report, has been reviewing transcripts this week of individual students going back four years to see if the problem really exists and if minority students are, in fact, being misplaced in math classes.

She said of the roughly 1,000 Latino and African-American students she has looked at so far, she could find only 27 students whose placement in algebra was questionable and probably could have been reviewed.

Sarraf said it would have been good for the group to come to the district and consult staff on the data it requested, which she said can be seriously misleading. Four years of big changes in the public school system can make it hard to tell what class students should be placed in the following year, she said. She speaks by phone with Mountain View Whisman School District's director of curriculum, Cathy Baur, every year trying to figure out the content of classes like "pre-algebra support," and whether they are a direct lead-in to geometry, she said.

How 'open' is open access?

Unlike some school districts, the Mountain View-Los Altos district has an "open access" policy for math class enrollment. Under the policy, students do not need to rely on past courses taken, test scores or grades to get into classes like geometry.

That policy may suggest that traditional barriers to enrollment in these classes are removed, and that it would be easier for disadvantaged students to dive into tougher classes, but Isaac believes such a policy can be deceptively unfair.

By suspending any requirements, she said, the district puts the burden of knowing what classes to sign up for on the parents and students themselves, rather than the school district, which means the burden is shifted onto the families to advocate for their kids and get them into the right classes. Parents whose first language is not English may not have a clear sense of what classes their kids need to sign up for, she said.

"It takes a certain institutional awareness to navigate the education realm," Isaac said.

Senate Resolution 60, adopted by the state Senate last year, encourages local school boards to develop a "transparent" mathematics placement policy that should take into account placement tests, statewide assessments, grades and coursework. Among other things, the resolution points to students' being misplaced in math courses as a serious concern, with the "most egregious" cases happening among the disproportionately misplaced minority students.

Sarraf called the idea expressed by Isaac that the open access policy bars minority students "infuriating." Working with the district for 45 years, she said, she's been through many iterations of math-placement policies, and the ones with well-defined requirements have been far more restrictive and keep students out of classes for things like low performance on a single test.

"These are all well-intended strategies, but the end results really didn't favor students in the past," Sarraf said.

With open access, she said, the difference is like night and day.

"I cannot tell you how many students came in with tears that they didn't make it into a class with the black-and-white system," she said.

Groves said the district doubled the number of Latino students taking the more rigorous math classes since it adopted open access. He said families do not have to go it alone advocating for themselves, and that there are plenty of counseling staff in the schools to help guide both parents and students to sign up for the right classes.

"We don't blindly let students make their decision without knowing how they're doing. We give them recommendations, but it's up to them to make the decision," Groves said.

No interest in a lawsuit

Despite the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights report's detail on grounds for a lawsuit against school districts that allegedly have racially biased math placement policies, Isaac said the LCCR's intent is not to sue individual school districts. The group has successfully litigated in the past, she said, but the real goal is to overcome what appears to be a systemic problem in the way minority students are placed in classes.

"Our hope is always to be able to work this out with the district and, essentially, the end goal is to make sure kids end up in the correct math classes," she said.

Isaac said the plan is to meet with residents and community groups in Mountain View in the next week or so to go over the data and better assess the problem.

Meanwhile, Sarraf said she will continue to dig through the transcripts of thousands of high school students, including white and Asian students, to see if there exists any kind of discrepancy in math placement.

She said that the report's findings regarding the MVLA district are likely incorrect, and the number of misplaced students is probably small, but she will still consult with the principals and see what they think as well. It's always possible, she said, that there is some deep-seated issue in student placement into math classes.

"I'm pretty sure that is not the conclusion I'm going to find," she said.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by PTAmom
a resident of Waverly Park
on Jun 4, 2015 at 8:15 pm

I just finished reading the report and I could not find anything about the high school district in it. Same for the press release. Where does either specify Mountain View - Los Altos? Doubting my intuition, I asked my husband, who has a degree in statistics and works on using computers to analyze "big data" for a living, whether it's valid to lump together data from nine separate districts and then conclude that what is true for the lump must also be true for each district in the lump. He laughed and said, "You know it's not." Why didn't these lawyers know that. Maybe they should take a statistics course.


Like this comment
Posted by SRB
a resident of St. Francis Acres
on Jun 4, 2015 at 11:48 pm

MV Voice, is this the report?

Web Link

If so, as pointed out by PTAmom, there is no mention of MVLA. In addition that report is dated January 2013 and uses data from the 2006-2007 school year.


2 people like this
Posted by Kevin Forestieri
Mountain View Voice Staff Writer
on Jun 4, 2015 at 11:58 pm

Kevin Forestieri is a registered user.

Among the content sent out to the Voice and other local media was an op-ed piece with the following, relevant paragraph:

"Using documents recently secured through the California Public Records Act, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area is now replicating these findings for individual school districts. Mountain View-Los Altos High School District, for example, is just down the road from Google’s headquarters. The District’s Hispanic and African-American students account for approximately 24% and 2% respectively of the student body. Yet our analysis shows that the District disproportionately enrolls these students in lower-level math classes in 9th grade – even when their grades and test scores are on par with white students’. Other districts that we are looking at show similar discrepancies."

One of the authors of the piece was also quoted in the article above directly explaining why MVLA was picked versus other school districts.


Like this comment
Posted by Last i remember
a resident of Monta Loma
on Jun 5, 2015 at 9:05 am

you were placed in the appropriate class from the tests you take. Is that not the case?


Like this comment
Posted by Common sense
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jun 5, 2015 at 9:17 am

The report describes a serious, disturbing issue if students truly were being arbitrarily held back.

Yet if what Barry Groves says is accurate -- LCCR "did not release the more district-specific data it used to come to its conclusion" -- then LCCR has been opaque on how it reaches its findings, and its credibility is seriously at issue. Dana Isaac of LCCR did little to help this situation in the article, offering assertions and anecdotes.

Unless these people are only interested in publicity-grabbing demagoguery, they need real transparency: show the data they used and how it led to their results, such that the results stand on their own in independent review -- not just some spokesperson's assertions.


Like this comment
Posted by PTAmom
a resident of Waverly Park
on Jun 5, 2015 at 9:23 am

So the lawyers acting as statisticians are "now replicating" the findings of a 2013 report based on 2007 data, without bothering to publish their assumptions, methodology or analysis so the rest of us can review them. Sounds like they're saying, "Trust us. We know better than educators and parents how to analyze student performance and use it to make the placements that respect students and their parents as complex, individual human beings." Sure.
And what does it mean to say that the grades and test scores are "on par" with white students'? This isn't about golf. It's about education of Latinos in a district that has earned accolades for narrowing the achievement gap, bringing Latinos into AP courses by providing extra support, and even helping them get into colleges like Stanford and Cal.


4 people like this
Posted by Techie_Lawyer
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Jun 5, 2015 at 1:58 pm

In an earlier post, "Common sense" says of the LCCR, "Unless these people are only interested in publicity-grabbing demagoguery, they need real transparency ... Dana Isaac of LCCR did little to help this situation in the article, offering assertions and anecdotes."

As regards "demagoguery", some historical facts are interesting and relevant. Ms. Dana Isaac, Esq., was formerly a personal injury lawyer employed by Berg Injury Lawyers. They run TV ads to get clients, and their founder started out as a TV pitch man in 1995. I'm not saying Ms. Isaac is an ambulance chaser, but her tactics in this matter certainly raise questions of bullying and self-righteous, self-important posturing, if not even more serious ethical concerns.

Look at the reason she gave for painting a bull's eye around MVLA: "While the problem is regional, Isaac said, it's important to focus on Mountain View-Los Altos because it's in the center of the tech industry -- right next door to Google -- which similarly lacks a strong minority presence. The nearby schools, she said, may be a contributing factor." She's trying to lay some blame on MVLA for Google's alleged lack of "a strong minority presence." Guilt by association, anyone? She knows full well that Google is not at all dependent on MVLA to fill its employment needs.

If one of Ms. Isaac's personal injury clients was dissatisfied with her advocacy, wouldn't she want that client to discuss his or her dissatisfaction directly with her before running to the press to accuse her of malpractice. Well, she's accusing the district of malpractice and, according to the Voice article, hasn't even contacted them since making her public records request.

The whole thing smacks of McCarthyism, from the hidden data to the public smears. Robert Welch, Esq., a noble attorney, is turning in his grave.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Hom Korean Kitchen expands to Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,355 views

Couples: Do These for 80% Chance of Divorce
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,751 views

Tips for the Best Latkes
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,474 views

 

The holidays are here!

From live music to a visit with Santa, here's a look at some local holiday activities to help you get into the spirit of the season.

VIEW