News

School district considers major construction plans

Facilities report includes up to $295 million in high school upgrades

The Mountain View-Los Altos High School District laid out its ambitious new vision for both of its high school campuses Monday night, complete with larger classrooms, more room for student services and gym space that can finally accommodate the myriad of school-sponsored extracurricular activities.

The draft Facilities Master Plan, which school board members reviewed at the Oct. 23 board meeting, outlines how the district could substantially revamp both Mountain View and Los Altos high schools by adding new two-story classroom buildings, expanding cafeteria and library space and getting rid of aging facilities and portables long past their prime. The overhaul is expected to cost anywhere from $108 million to $119 million at Los Altos and $121 million to $132 million at Mountain View, according to the plan.

A critical component of the plan is fitting in 29 additional classrooms -- 15 at Los Altos and 14 at Mountain View -- giving the schools more room to grow. Demographic studies show the school district's enrollment is expected to increase to 4,576 students by the 2021-22 school year, up from 4,101 last year, and both schools are already struggling to fit the existing number of students.

The growing pains have cropped up in different ways over the years. The district scrambled to accommodate 2017-18 enrollment at Los Altos this year by converting its old weight room into makeshift classroom spaces. Mental health services have also been squeezed into fairly unorthodox nooks on the two campuses, and Mountain View High School has struggled to bring back its wrestling team for years because there was simply no available place on campus for it to practice.

In the case of both schools, limited space is forcing the district to build up. Wings of classrooms would be demolished and replaced with two-story classroom buildings, and the front offices are swapped out for a larger shared space combining administrative and student services. This effectively grants schools more room for the College and Career Center, academic counseling and mental health services, which have been strapped for space over the last decade.

The plan takes it a step further at Mountain View High, calling for the school's new cafeteria to be included on the first floor of the student services building, which would be located in a much better spot -- just north of the Main Quad -- than its current location south of the multipurpose room, according to Mark Quattrocchi of Quattrocchi Kwok Architects. Under the plan, the current cafeteria would instead be home to the school's drama classes, choir and ensemble.

The master plan also includes new auxiliary gyms at both schools, though the fate of the current small gym differs. Mountain View High's small gym would be converted into a multipurpose space for dance, wrestling and performance arts, and could potentially be divided via a moveable wall to maximize its future use. Los Altos High School's new small gym, on the other hand, replaces the existing one, which is essentially falling apart. A report from last year found pretty much everything about the building -- from the roof and the windows to the exterior cement plaster -- was in poor condition, and that the building was hardly worth saving.

The downside of the big plans and two-story construction is that the costs add up fast. The two-story classroom building alone is likely to cost more than $40 million at each school. If the school board decides to tack on additional items -- like a new facility for Freestyle Academy and upgrades at Alta Vista High School, the adult education center and the district office -- the master plan would cost between $270 million to $295 million to build out.

Quattrocchi tried to take the edge off the sticker shock, noting that each line of the budget includes a huge range of non-construction costs including contingency money, demolition, annual cost escalation, testing and inspection. He said it's also important to remember that public school construction is just naturally going to to be more expensive than private business and home building.

"The cost of education work is beyond the pale," he said.

Board member Joe Mitchner said the package of construction and modernization projects seems too expensive, but was uneasy about making cost-cutting suggestions on the spot during the first round of review. Although Quattrocchi suggested that the Oct. 23 meeting was an ideal time to start taking board feedback on the scope and scale of the projects, Mitchner repeatedly said he and his colleagues simply don't have enough granular information to make those calls. The plan says it would cost $5 million to modernize the gym at Mountain View High, and he wondered whether that amount ought to be much lower or eliminated entirely.

"It's more expensive than I'd like to see, and I'd like to see some things get scaled back,"

Earlier this month, two voter surveys showed that the district would have a good shot at passing either a $198 million or a $268 million facilities bond at the ballot box next year. Board members said they want a project list with costs somewhere in the middle -- between $210 million and $225 million -- along with a wish list of less essential projects ready to go in case there's room in the budget.

Quattrocchi said his firm could come back to the board with a project list that fits the constraints, but warned that slicing off $50 million or $60 million from the budget can't be achieved through small tweaks and removing a modernization project here and there. It would likely force something large -- like a scale-back of the student services building -- in order to pull off. Board president Debbie Torok said she would be willing to pare back something like the student union room in the student services building if it balanced out the budget.

"Student union is nice, but it's not a win-win for me if we can't do it in a budget that's maintainable," Torok said.

Despite projections showing Los Altos High School's enrollment will grow by hundreds of students in only a few years, the master plan does not increase available parking at the school. Quattrocchi said the plan made great efforts to preserve existing parking spaces on the campus, but conceded that the firm was unable to find a good spot for additional parking because of the school's small footprint.

"It was imperative for us to keep parking," he said. "And doing a parking structure is such a cost-prohibitive thing."

District staff and the architect firm stressed that the master plan is a "living document" and a draft, and that nothing is set in stone at this juncture. Board members are expected to give final approve of the master plan next month.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

53 people like this
Posted by Fred
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Oct 30, 2017 at 2:17 pm

The high school district sold one high school site in about 1980. But luckily the other two campuses are large enough for expansion. This plan, though, assumes more students will not flee the public schools for safer private schools or home schooling or classes on-line.


4 people like this
Posted by Yonatan
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Oct 30, 2017 at 4:00 pm

Yeah, much like selling the old elementary school that was near Target back in the 80s, the demolition of the old MVHS back in the 80s was a dumb move.

It's why I was very glad that when enrollment dropped in the early 00's the school district just leased Slater out to Google till enrollment could increase.
Hopefully Jose Antonio Vargas school will open soon!

Also, Frank, while I am sure that some (white) people will "flee" the public schools, there are a whole lot of people who either do not want or cannot afford to do so.

Luckily Mountain View has a good tax base and funding method so we can pay our teachers very well.

As a graduate of the MV public schools, I will be glad to pay to upgrade MVHS.
Go Spartans!!!


3 people like this
Posted by Fred
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Oct 31, 2017 at 1:03 am

Hang on ,Yonatan." May I call you "YO" for short? Slater was closed to raise money for employees. The district just extended the lease with Google. Slater is NOT being returned. Nor is Whisman School. The district just extended that lease to the German School for decades. Why? For money honey. Schools are operated for the benefit of administrators and other employees. Students come and go. They are secondary.


3 people like this
Posted by YO mon
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Oct 31, 2017 at 9:16 am

looking at the world with dystopian glasses will usually get you a distorted view

the old Castro Street block of old MVHS is a much better resource for the community as a large public park & pool, large apartment community, and a multitude of street-level retail establishments

get your cuppa and falafel or pizza

IMO


5 people like this
Posted by John
a resident of North Bayshore
on Oct 31, 2017 at 8:19 pm

Why not leased out or sell all of the school sites and close the district? Poor families could receive vouchers for other schools or options - such as online schooling. Rich families have no business receiving welfare assistance through the provision of public schools.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Contemporary Indian restaurant, Ettan, headed to Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 6,232 views

Premarital and Couples: Tips for Hearing (Listening) and Being Known
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,468 views

Two degrees can do all that?
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 1,192 views

Tame, Maim and Claim the Wild Sea Vegetable
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 688 views

 

Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More