Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A 152-mile long canal that irrigates pistachios and other crops in the eastern San Joaquin Valley is sinking by an inch a month, the result of groundwater over-pumping by farmers.

The Sacramento Bee described the Friant-Kern Canal as an engineering marvel, but its capacity has been reduced by as much as 60 percent at because of subsidence.

The Bee: “Now it’s reaching a crisis point on the Friant-Kern, and California voters are being asked to fix it”

Proposition 3, an $8.9 billion bond on the November ballot, would set aside $750 million to repair the canal, and additional sums to avert subsidence. Gerald Meral, a former water policy advisor to Gov. Jerry Brown, wrote the initiative.

Business groups and farmers, many of them seeking canal improvements, donated $1.75 million of the $2.75 million Meral raised for the initiative so far. Environmental groups attracted by the measure’s promise of billions for habitat restoration have given $1 million.

Some specifics: LA River $150 million; Salton Sea and San Francisco Bay wetlands restoration $200 million each; clean drinking water and water quality $3 billion.

Meral: “The state can’t continue to underinvest in water. We have people who don’t have adequate water supplies. It is a human rights problem.”

Opposition: Sierra Club warns Proposition 3 could be used to “fund dam projects that are harmful to the environment.” So far, there’s no funding for an opposition campaign.

P.S. Republican gubernatorial candidate John Cox supports Proposition 3, telling CALmatters in a statement that it offers “the opportunity to build dramatically more storage and provide clean water.” Democratic gubernatorial candidate Gavin Newsom has not taken a stand.

Bond debt: There is no free money

If voters approve Proposition 3, the $8.9 billion water bond on the November ballot, taxpayers would pay $17.3 billion during the bond’s 40-year life, the Legislative Analyst’s office says.

That would work out to $433 million a year.

Gov. Jerry Brown, who has tried to limit bonds and pay down debt, reported in his final budget that the cost of debt service has increased but at a slower pace during his tenure.

Total bond payments are $7.3 billion in a budget of $201 billion. The state has $120 billion in bond debt broken out like this:

• $74.2 billion in voter-approved general obligation bonds, some of it dating to the 1970s and 1980s.

• $9.2 billion in legislature-approved bond debt.

• $37.1 billion in bond funds that are authorized but not spent.

CA faces a recycling crisis. Will we waste it?

Tons of paper and plastic we dutifully place in recycling bins are piling up in warehouses or being dumped in landfills.

The issue: California had exported discarded paper and plastic to China. But China has its own garbage and stopped accepting our waste earlier this year because it was contaminated with material that couldn’t be recycled.

Numbers: Californians generated 76.5 million tons of garbage in 2016. Only 44 percent was recycled. China accepted 55,000 tons of mixed plastic from California in the first quarter of 2017. In the first quarter of 2018, that number fell to 4,900 tons.

Cal Recycle director Scott Smithline: “We have to take responsibility for the material we’re producing.”

A solution: Sen. Bob Wieckowski, a Fremont Democrat, is pushing legislation requiring that beverage containers sold in this state contain recycled material, perhaps 35 percent or more. He’s also advocating more in-state recycling plants, which would provide jobs.

That effort suffered a setback when Graphic Packaging International, which made packaging for Sierra Nevada Brewery from recycled paper, closed its Santa Clara plant last year, citing high costs of doing business in California.

What’s ahead: Expect more bills to limit single-use products like one to discourage plastic straws, new regulations to limit non-recyclable packaging, and requirements that products contain recycle material.

Democratic Assembly candidate faces fraud charges

The Shasta County District Attorney has charged a long-shot Democratic assembly candidate with fraud and grand theft for falsely claiming she worked thousands of hours as an employee of In-Home Support Services, a state program to provides care so frail elderly people can remain in their homes, the Record-Searchlight reports.

Caleen Sisk got 24 percent of the primary vote on June 5, sufficient to get into the November run-off against Assembly Republican Leader Brian Dahle.

The prosecutor says the state paid Sisk $38,300 for 4,441 hours she fraudulently claimed. For part of that time, she reportedly worked at High Desert State Prison in Susanville as a spiritual advisor to inmates.

Walters: Millions of reasons to sweat the census

CALmatters’ Dan Walters comments on California’s fight with the Trump administration over the census, noting the state’s congressional delegation could drop by a seat if there’s a significant undercount.

Money also is at stake. The California Community Foundation estimates that “every uncounted resident costs California $1,934 in annual federal funding.” No wonder that the new state budget includes $90 million to encourage Californians to stand up and be counted.

CALmatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California’s policies and politics. Read more state news from CALmatters here.

Join the Conversation

14 Comments

  1. 8.9 billion will buy nothing as it has in the past. The politicians use these bonds as their personal pocket books. Look at the waste train. Who wants a slow ride from Compton to Stockton. Keep voting yes and not getting the promised benefits.

  2. Tell us again how we are going to achieve Zero Waste? The public has finally figured out that we have been duped. The campaign was designed to make the public think that they are saving the earth. When we closed all the landfills, The idea was to sell the recyclables to China. Well guess what? They do not want it. Guess what recyclables are called now? Garbage. Where does garbage go? A landfill.
    The Zero Waste campaign is just a big propganda ploy to fill government coffers. The pension obligations are at the root of these campaign. For, example: Why did Bill Lockear,the head of CALPERSat the time, create the $10,000,000 bond to create the Anerobic digester cofounded with Zero Waste next to Zanker landfill? Furthermore, where is the data that shows that this project even works? This project is a white elaphant.These schemes are just a way to fleece the taxpayers out of their hard earned money.

  3. @ help him

    Your comment is pretty much in line with how the Zero Waste reacts when they get caught wasting and or stealing tax payer money. Are you sure you do not work for Zero Waste?

Leave a comment