State launches $50M program for school-based mental health | News | Mountain View Online |


State launches $50M program for school-based mental health

Bevy of recent bills boost the role of school districts in health care, suicide prevention

The California State Legislature is calling on local school districts to come up with new ways to fill big gaps in mental health care for children and teens, setting aside $50 million this year for schools willing to try new ways of detecting and preventing mental illness through campus-based services.

The Mental Health Student Services Act, established through budget legislation this year, launches a grant program where county behavioral health departments -- largely responsible for publicly funded mental health care -- can partner with local schools to create campus-based mental health services. The goal is to reach students before mental illness becomes severe and disabling, preventing suicide, dropouts, homelessness and suffering.

The act builds on a common trend among California lawmakers, who have sought over the last three years to migrate the role of mental health care from the clinic to the classroom. Services provided on campus could serve as the first line of defense, with the potential to detect mental health conditions long before they worsen. Studies have found that close to half of all mental health conditions start by age 14, rising to three-fourths by age 24.

Santa Clara County Superintendent Mary Ann Dewan said she is prepared to pursue the funding. The shift toward school-based mental health has been driven by school leaders and school board members who understand the increasing need for student services, she said. A child's wellness affects how well they perform in school, she said, and many schools have already launched in-house mental health initiatives.

"Public schools are already engaged in supporting children and families with mental and behavior health as well as promoting wellness on school campuses," Dewan said. "It brings tremendous value when schools and county offices of education can work together to offer early intervention, access to ongoing support and coordinated care."

State leaders are still working out the nuts and bolts of the grant process but are expecting plenty of interest, said Toby Ewing, executive director of the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission. When the state set aside money for triage services -- essentially crisis mental health care including residential treatment -- starting in 2013, he said there was a "tremendous" response from agencies, including schools. There were many conversations with teachers, said Ewing, who urged the state to support more mental health care in schools.

Trouble is, most of that money didn't go to schools or kids at all. In the first round of funding, just over 15% went to youth-centric programs. The new Mental Health Student Services Act explicitly calls for counties and schools to partner up, putting forth a joint grant application showing how schools could support students with in-house mental health care and, if deemed necessary, link them to clinical services provided through Medi-Cal or private insurance coverage.

It may seem unusual for school districts to lead the way on health care services better suited for a clinic, but Ewing said there's been increasing recognition from a broad range of school staff -- from teachers to principals to superintendents -- that schools have a role to play in mental health. California schools have long provided mental health care in a limited capacity through special education funding, but the growing consensus is that it's not enough.

"Often times there are kids who would benefit from and need mental health services where special education is not the right strategy," he said.

National studies have found that about one in five children have a mental, emotional or behavioral disorder, but only about 20% of those children actually receive care from a mental health provider. The delay in receiving treatment often spans six to eight years for mood disorders and nine to 23 years for anxiety disorders, with longer delays for males, minorities and lower-educated patients.

In the Mountain View-Los Altos High School District, more than a half-dozen therapists are already employed to support hundreds of students each year, primarily for anxiety and depression. Initiatives include anonymous referral boxes, giving the district's clinical services team a chance to check in with teens who may be struggling. Even with help from outside funding sources, the district is spending in excess of $1 million a year on student wellness.

Nellie Meyer, the district's new superintendent, told the Voice that she's aware of the new legislation and will watch to see what requirements will be placed on the grant funding. She said it's good to see the state's renewed commitment to support mental health care for students, and that the available funding could boost the framework of support services already financed by the district.

Grants from the Mental Health Student Services Act can pay for both direct mental health services as well as prevention and early intervention, which could include hiring therapists and training existing school staff. The funding can't pay for the existing programs already operating in Mountain View-Los Altos.

Counties must give all school districts an equal chance at the funding, but it's unclear exactly how many grants will be accepted. Although the the budget signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in June allocated $50 million in funding to the program, state legislators had asked for $550 million.

State Sen. Jim Beall (D-San Jose) is seeking to supplement that funding with changes to the Mental Health Wellness Act through Senate Bill 582, which would require half of the mental health triage funds to pay for "local educational agency and mental health partnerships." The Santa Clara County Office of Education was among the applicants for the funding, Dewan said.

Since 2016, California has passed a number of mental health bills focused on the role of schools. In 2016, then-Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law requiring all school districts to adopt their own suicide prevention plan for high-risk students from seventh to 12th grade. Assembly Bill 2639, authored by Assemblyman Marc Berman (D-Palo Alto) last year, strengthened the bill by requiring mandatory updates to those policies and more guidance for training school staff on both suicide awareness and prevention.

Another bill passed last year, Assembly Bill 2022, requires school districts to inform students multiple times per year of mental health services available on campus and in the community. An early version of the bill called for one mental health professional to be employed for every 600 students, but the language was cut in an early round of amendments.

The goal is to put out a request for proposals and start accepting grant applications by the end of the year, Ewing said.

When asked whether the added responsibility of providing mental health care could become a burden on public schools, Dewan said she believes schools can balance mental and behavioral services on top of academics -- so long as they receive adequate funding and trained, qualified staff. The real and immediate problem is that kids aren't getting the health care they need to be successful.

"The risk that we see now is that children in our schools need support, and the lack of support is impacting their educational progress," she said.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Sarah1000
a resident of another community
on Aug 1, 2019 at 3:11 pm

Sarah1000 is a registered user.

School-based “wellness” programs are not sufficient for treating youth who have mental illness or serious conduct disorders. These children require treatment by mental health professionals; that is, psychiatrists and/or psychologists. A child who is diagnosed with a mental health condition may receive some of these services through his/her school district if the district qualifies her/him for special education services. However, a youth who has serious behavioral issues is sometimes labeled by the school district as having a “conduct disorder” rather than an “emotional disturbance” and, therefore, does not qualify for special education services. Too often the only “support” offered to these youth is additional training of the classroom teacher; that is, training on how to try and manage extreme and sometimes violent behaviors while simultaneously addressing the needs of all the other students in the classroom. Conduct disorders are more prevalent in males. Not surprisingly, these boys are often socially isolated and prone to using inappropriate coping techniques such as violent video games. These boys grow into angry young adults. I hope Santa Clara County’s Department of Education will seek the advice of and partner with the youth mental health professionals of our community to develop school-based programs which provide the treatment that some of our youth so desperately need.

2 people like this
Posted by Ben
a resident of Jackson Park
on Aug 1, 2019 at 9:42 pm

There are 6.1 million public school students in California so $50 million ain't a whole lot.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Anne Le Ziblatt, formerly of Tamarine and Bong Su, is back with a Vietnamese noodle bar in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 3,680 views

Local Pols Debate Climate
By Sherry Listgarten | 11 comments | 2,999 views

Truth Matters (and so does good beer)
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,256 views

You Can Help: Scents and Migraines
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,026 views