News

Walgreens agrees to $7.5M settlement over alleged phony pharmacist

Prosecutors: Woman working without license handled more than 745K prescriptions

Pharmacy giant Walgreen Co. has agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle a consumer protection lawsuit alleging that it put people's health at risk by allowing a phony pharmacist to handle more than 745,000 prescriptions in the Bay Area, prosecutors said on Monday.

"Consumers depend on pharmacies to make sure that the person behind the counter preparing and giving out medical prescription drugs is trained, competent and licensed to do so. Their lives may depend on it," Santa Clara County Deputy District Attorney Tiyen Lin said in a statement.

Santa Clara County prosecutors filed the lawsuit with the Alameda County District Attorney's Office after they learned that Walgreens had employed Kim Thien Le as a pharmacist for over a decade, even though she wasn't licensed by the California State Board of Pharmacy.

The complaint alleges that Walgreens failed to vet Le, 44, of Milpitas, thoroughly when it promoted her to positions requiring a license and failed to make sure that its internal systems were strong enough to prevent an employee from evading them.

It alleges that Le, who worked as a pharmacist in Milpitas, San Jose and Fremont, performed one or more of the pharmacist-required steps for more than 745,000 prescriptions, including over 100,000 prescriptions for controlled substances such as oxycodone, fentanyl, morphine and codeine.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

Le's 15-year employment with Walgreens ended in October 2017.

Last July, the California Attorney General's Office charged Le with felony counts of impersonating pharmacists, stealing their identities and obtaining money under false pretenses between 2006 and 2017.

Her case is pending in Alameda County Superior Court.

"This case serves as a cautionary tale for every health care provider that hires people into positions requiring a professional license," Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley said in a statement.

"The burden is on the company to make sure its employees are properly licensed and to complete a thorough background check. My office will be vigilant in protecting consumers and enforcing licensing laws."

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

O'Malley said that once the matter came to light, Walgreens took immediate steps to re-verify the licenses of its pharmacy employees around the country and instituted other remedial measures.

The civil judgment, which was filed in Alameda County Superior Court, requires Walgreens to ensure licensure compliance by implementing a verification program, posting proof of licensure, conducting annual audits and submitting an annual compliance report.

The judgment also requires Walgreens to pay approximately $7.5 million in penalties, costs and remedial payments.

O'Malley said Walgreens and its counsel worked cooperatively with prosecutors and regulators to implement the changes.

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Walgreens agrees to $7.5M settlement over alleged phony pharmacist

Prosecutors: Woman working without license handled more than 745K prescriptions

by /

Uploaded: Tue, Feb 4, 2020, 10:09 am

Pharmacy giant Walgreen Co. has agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle a consumer protection lawsuit alleging that it put people's health at risk by allowing a phony pharmacist to handle more than 745,000 prescriptions in the Bay Area, prosecutors said on Monday.

"Consumers depend on pharmacies to make sure that the person behind the counter preparing and giving out medical prescription drugs is trained, competent and licensed to do so. Their lives may depend on it," Santa Clara County Deputy District Attorney Tiyen Lin said in a statement.

Santa Clara County prosecutors filed the lawsuit with the Alameda County District Attorney's Office after they learned that Walgreens had employed Kim Thien Le as a pharmacist for over a decade, even though she wasn't licensed by the California State Board of Pharmacy.

The complaint alleges that Walgreens failed to vet Le, 44, of Milpitas, thoroughly when it promoted her to positions requiring a license and failed to make sure that its internal systems were strong enough to prevent an employee from evading them.

It alleges that Le, who worked as a pharmacist in Milpitas, San Jose and Fremont, performed one or more of the pharmacist-required steps for more than 745,000 prescriptions, including over 100,000 prescriptions for controlled substances such as oxycodone, fentanyl, morphine and codeine.

Le's 15-year employment with Walgreens ended in October 2017.

Last July, the California Attorney General's Office charged Le with felony counts of impersonating pharmacists, stealing their identities and obtaining money under false pretenses between 2006 and 2017.

Her case is pending in Alameda County Superior Court.

"This case serves as a cautionary tale for every health care provider that hires people into positions requiring a professional license," Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley said in a statement.

"The burden is on the company to make sure its employees are properly licensed and to complete a thorough background check. My office will be vigilant in protecting consumers and enforcing licensing laws."

O'Malley said that once the matter came to light, Walgreens took immediate steps to re-verify the licenses of its pharmacy employees around the country and instituted other remedial measures.

The civil judgment, which was filed in Alameda County Superior Court, requires Walgreens to ensure licensure compliance by implementing a verification program, posting proof of licensure, conducting annual audits and submitting an annual compliance report.

The judgment also requires Walgreens to pay approximately $7.5 million in penalties, costs and remedial payments.

O'Malley said Walgreens and its counsel worked cooperatively with prosecutors and regulators to implement the changes.

Comments

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.