Walgreens agrees to $7.5M settlement over alleged phony pharmacist | News | Mountain View Online |


Walgreens agrees to $7.5M settlement over alleged phony pharmacist

Prosecutors: Woman working without license handled more than 745K prescriptions

Pharmacy giant Walgreen Co. has agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle a consumer protection lawsuit alleging that it put people's health at risk by allowing a phony pharmacist to handle more than 745,000 prescriptions in the Bay Area, prosecutors said on Monday.

"Consumers depend on pharmacies to make sure that the person behind the counter preparing and giving out medical prescription drugs is trained, competent and licensed to do so. Their lives may depend on it," Santa Clara County Deputy District Attorney Tiyen Lin said in a statement.

Santa Clara County prosecutors filed the lawsuit with the Alameda County District Attorney's Office after they learned that Walgreens had employed Kim Thien Le as a pharmacist for over a decade, even though she wasn't licensed by the California State Board of Pharmacy.

The complaint alleges that Walgreens failed to vet Le, 44, of Milpitas, thoroughly when it promoted her to positions requiring a license and failed to make sure that its internal systems were strong enough to prevent an employee from evading them.

It alleges that Le, who worked as a pharmacist in Milpitas, San Jose and Fremont, performed one or more of the pharmacist-required steps for more than 745,000 prescriptions, including over 100,000 prescriptions for controlled substances such as oxycodone, fentanyl, morphine and codeine.

Le's 15-year employment with Walgreens ended in October 2017.

Last July, the California Attorney General's Office charged Le with felony counts of impersonating pharmacists, stealing their identities and obtaining money under false pretenses between 2006 and 2017.

Her case is pending in Alameda County Superior Court.

"This case serves as a cautionary tale for every health care provider that hires people into positions requiring a professional license," Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley said in a statement.

"The burden is on the company to make sure its employees are properly licensed and to complete a thorough background check. My office will be vigilant in protecting consumers and enforcing licensing laws."

O'Malley said that once the matter came to light, Walgreens took immediate steps to re-verify the licenses of its pharmacy employees around the country and instituted other remedial measures.

The civil judgment, which was filed in Alameda County Superior Court, requires Walgreens to ensure licensure compliance by implementing a verification program, posting proof of licensure, conducting annual audits and submitting an annual compliance report.

The judgment also requires Walgreens to pay approximately $7.5 million in penalties, costs and remedial payments.

O'Malley said Walgreens and its counsel worked cooperatively with prosecutors and regulators to implement the changes.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Umami Burger calls it quits in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 9,238 views

Couples and Premarital : "Who we are . . . depends in part . . . on who we love."
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,615 views

Flying: How much is enough? It's personal.
By Sherry Listgarten | 9 comments | 2,156 views

Wait, wait – we’re working on it
By Diana Diamond | 9 comments | 1,386 views

My Pet Peeves
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 7 comments | 1,212 views


Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

View Details