News

Students protest over vote on proposed Santa Clara County sex assault policy study

A group of high school students on Sunday protested outside the Palo Alto home of a Santa Clara County supervisor over a September decision by the Board of Supervisors to collect more background on a proposed study of sexual assault and harassment policies in schools and colleges.

On Sept. 22, Santa Clara County supervisors discuss a proposal to pursue a study on sex- and gender-based harassment and violence policies in K-12 schools and post-secondary institutions. Screenshot obtained from Santa Clara County video.

The group, which organizer Rachel Sun said included a number of high-school-age victims of sexual assault, gathered Sunday at Palo Alto's Duveneck Elementary School and then marched a few blocks to the home of Supervisor Joe Simitian. Sun and other protesters contend Simitian has used "procedural stalling tactics" to allow the imposition of new Title IX regulations for high school and college policies and procedures for handling sexual violence.

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors voted on Sept. 22 to oppose moving ahead with an investigation into the uniformity and enforcement of all of the county's sex- and gender-based discrimination and harassment policies in county schools.

The proposal by Supervisor Dave Cortese would task the county with pulling together what's happening across each level of education.

"The reason that this is being brought forward now … is just because Betsy DeVos at the federal level .. basically more narrowly tailored the criteria for what would constitute Title IX violations," Cortese said at the September meeting.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

Simitian, along with Supervisors Susan Ellenberg and Mike Wasserman, voted to delay any investigation for at least 60 days, giving the supervisors and county staff time to gather more information about the possible investigation.

The board requested county staff return on Nov. 17 with a recommended scope of work for the study.

"The Board majority thought that the work should be done thoughtfully and thoroughly. These issues are too important to do otherwise," Simitian said in a statement to this news organization.

On Sunday, protesters, wearing masks and practicing social distancing, demanded Simitian back the measure when it returns to the board of supervisors in November.

In a statement, Sun — a senior at Gunn High School in Palo Alto — said 45 "student survivors" gave two hours of testimony at the board meeting.

According to recent Palo Alto High School graduate Alexa Aalami, a founder of the student group Responsive Inclusive Safe Environment, the study was important because, with the new Title IX regulations, school and college policies and procedures for handling sexual violence have been placed into disarray.

"Survivors are falling though the cracks, and we need the county to step up to the plate and help parents and students to see how their schools are handling sexual violence," Aalami said.

Editor's note: This story incorrectly reported the Sept. 22 action taken by the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors. Mountain View Online regrets the error.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Students protest over vote on proposed Santa Clara County sex assault policy study

by /

Uploaded: Mon, Oct 12, 2020, 10:50 am

A group of high school students on Sunday protested outside the Palo Alto home of a Santa Clara County supervisor over a September decision by the Board of Supervisors to collect more background on a proposed study of sexual assault and harassment policies in schools and colleges.

The group, which organizer Rachel Sun said included a number of high-school-age victims of sexual assault, gathered Sunday at Palo Alto's Duveneck Elementary School and then marched a few blocks to the home of Supervisor Joe Simitian. Sun and other protesters contend Simitian has used "procedural stalling tactics" to allow the imposition of new Title IX regulations for high school and college policies and procedures for handling sexual violence.

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors voted on Sept. 22 to oppose moving ahead with an investigation into the uniformity and enforcement of all of the county's sex- and gender-based discrimination and harassment policies in county schools.

The proposal by Supervisor Dave Cortese would task the county with pulling together what's happening across each level of education.

"The reason that this is being brought forward now … is just because Betsy DeVos at the federal level .. basically more narrowly tailored the criteria for what would constitute Title IX violations," Cortese said at the September meeting.

Simitian, along with Supervisors Susan Ellenberg and Mike Wasserman, voted to delay any investigation for at least 60 days, giving the supervisors and county staff time to gather more information about the possible investigation.

The board requested county staff return on Nov. 17 with a recommended scope of work for the study.

"The Board majority thought that the work should be done thoughtfully and thoroughly. These issues are too important to do otherwise," Simitian said in a statement to this news organization.

On Sunday, protesters, wearing masks and practicing social distancing, demanded Simitian back the measure when it returns to the board of supervisors in November.

In a statement, Sun — a senior at Gunn High School in Palo Alto — said 45 "student survivors" gave two hours of testimony at the board meeting.

According to recent Palo Alto High School graduate Alexa Aalami, a founder of the student group Responsive Inclusive Safe Environment, the study was important because, with the new Title IX regulations, school and college policies and procedures for handling sexual violence have been placed into disarray.

"Survivors are falling though the cracks, and we need the county to step up to the plate and help parents and students to see how their schools are handling sexual violence," Aalami said.

Editor's note: This story incorrectly reported the Sept. 22 action taken by the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors. Mountain View Online regrets the error.

Comments

ML Kyle
Registered user
Monta Loma
on Oct 12, 2020 at 12:14 pm
ML Kyle, Monta Loma
Registered user
on Oct 12, 2020 at 12:14 pm
11 people like this

Protesting outside someone's house seems incredibly wrong to me. There's hundreds of issues facing our communities and harassing people at their residence makes solving any of them less likely. Would someone with a young family ever enter politics given the likelihood of being harassed?


GailM
Registered user
North Bayshore
on Oct 12, 2020 at 2:59 pm
GailM, North Bayshore
Registered user
on Oct 12, 2020 at 2:59 pm
5 people like this

Given what I know to be the life-long scars caused by sexual abuse and harassment, especially of young students, the supervisors need to step up! I urge them, and others with the authority to promote civil behavior, to do so -- to get familiar with the county's policies, to strengthen them as needed, and to fully enforce them. I strongly support peaceful demonstrations that bring our attention to the violence that our students should not have to endure.


Steven Nelson
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on Oct 13, 2020 at 10:22 am
Steven Nelson, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on Oct 13, 2020 at 10:22 am
Like this comment

Simitian is an Old Guy like me and he needs to be reminded that his votes and "staff directions" have an effect on young people (males are not immune from sexual assault). TAKE TO HOME is an entirely proper exercise of FREE (POLITICAL) SPEECH under both the California and Federal Constitutions.

Just - don't block his driveway, threaten, or vandalize. In Chile - the mothers of "the disappeared" and their supporters Banged The Pots. Please - not TOO Much of that kids. (make yourself heard, Cacerolazo!)


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.