News

Virus outbreaks unavoidable as school campuses reopen, experts warn

Desks are distanced from one another in a first grade classroom at Santa Rita Elementary School in Los Altos on Oct. 12. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

As schools inch closer to reopening campuses in some parts of California, medical experts are warning that the spread of the coronavirus will be inevitable and schools need to prepare.

Recent studies have shown that while children infected with the coronavirus are less likely to have symptoms, they often carry larger viral loads and can be "super spreaders," passing the virus to each other, their families and teachers.

And without widespread testing and contact tracing, identifying children who are infected is nearly impossible because most are asymptomatic, doctors said.

"It's very likely that even with careful screening, kids are going to end up in school with infections," said Dr. Dylan Chan, associate professor of otolaryngology (ear and throat medicine) at UC San Francisco. "Schools need to recognize that and get strategies in place."

Schools in some parts of California have reopened or are close to reopening, either because the state has granted them a waiver or their county health officials have given approval. Small in-person classes for students in special education or other high-needs groups have also started in some districts.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

Schools that reopen must adhere to the state's strict health and safety protocols that include social distancing, mask requirements, deep cleaning and sending home students who might be sick.

So far, the California Department of Public Health has seen a "very small" number of outbreaks - defined as three or more cases - at K-12 schools that have reopened, according to the department.

Last week, Dr. Mark Galhy, head of the state's Health and Human Services Department, credited the small caseload to schools' and communities' precautionary measures.

"So far, it's encouraging to see the tremendous effort and planning that communities and their schools and their staff have done to make sure that it's lower risk for students and staff alike and ... I think that's encouraging for all of California," he said.

Nonetheless, as more schools open, outbreaks associated with schools will be inevitable -- whether they originate at the school or within the community, according to the Department of Public Health.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

"As long as Covid-19 is circulating in communities, it should be expected that cases will be reported in a variety of settings, including among school students, teachers and staff in schools that have reopened for in-person learning," a department spokesperson wrote in an email to EdSource.

"However, these cases may be associated with transmission within schools or community transmission, and there are school and public health plans in place for when COVID-19 occurs at a school, to implement control measures that will limit transmission within schools."

But even the strictest safety protocols might not be enough to prevent infected students from coming to school and unknowingly transmitting the virus to others, according to Chan and his colleagues at UC San Francisco. In studying random coronavirus tests of 30,000 children nationwide, Chan and his team found that the infection rate among children - even if they're asymptomatic - mirrors that of the communities in which they live.

Based on that equation, they developed a tool for schools to determine how many infected students they can expect on campus. For example, in Los Angeles County, a school with 500 students is 98% likely to have at least one student who's infected.

"It's important to note that even in communities with low infection rates, we still found kids with asymptomatic infections," Chan said. "Schools need to focus on reading the risks and protecting people."

Researchers at the Kaiser Family Foundation reached a similar conclusion, saying that outbreaks related to schools reopening may be unavoidable.

"Where there is already widespread community transmission, as is the case in many areas in the U.S., there is clearly a risk of spread associated with reopening schools," according to a Kaiser Family Foundation report published July 29. "This challenge may be more pronounced where testing and contact tracing capacity is limited."

In addition to masks and social distancing, some schools are considering installing ventilation systems that keep air flowing, since research suggests the virus is airborne; holding classes outdoors as weather permits; hiring extra staff to clean classrooms and enforce safety protocols; limiting the number of students in a classroom; and separating desks by 6 feet.

Those steps can help lower, but not eliminate, the risk, according to Laura Flaherty, a policy researcher at the Rand Corporation, a nonprofit research and policy think tank.

"There are a number of ways to reduce the transmission of Covid-19 in schools, although none of these measures take the risk to zero," she said in a video on the Rand website.

Flaherty and her colleagues suggested that schools space students apart as much as possible, expanding classes to other facilities such as libraries and community centers, if necessary; trying a week-on, week-off schedule so students and teachers have some consistency with instruction; having teachers rotate among small groups of students; and hiring tutors to work with students when teachers are unavailable.

A hybrid model of in-person and remote instruction might be one of the most important ways schools can reduce the transmission of Covid-19, researchers at Mathematica, a policy and research firm, found.

Examining 400,000 simulations of possible virus transmission in schools, researchers found that schools can "dramatically" lower the chance of an outbreak by combining a hybrid schedule with strict safety protocols, like wearing masks and eliminating in-person social interactions outside of class.

Researchers also found that temporarily closing schools when an outbreak occurs is a less effective way to control the virus than adopting a hybrid model and enforcing safety protocols to begin with.

But no method is foolproof, researchers said.

"The possibility that schools could exacerbate the pandemic is a serious concern," they said on the Mathematica website. "Every school that is opening its building to students - part time or full time, starting now or later in the school year - needs to prepare for the likelihood that a student or staff member will become infected with COVID-19, and have a plan in place for what to do next."

Still, some believe that the benefits of reopening schools outweigh the risks - especially for students for whom distance learning has been a struggle, or whose parents work.

Distance learning has been a fiasco for too many students, especially those who were already at risk of falling behind, and it exacerbated an achievement gap in California that was among the widest in the country even before the pandemic, said Samantha Tran, senior managing director for education at Children Now, an advocacy and research organization.

Students who lack reliable internet access, technical devices or a quiet place for online learning are falling dangerously behind their peers academically, she said. And many other students - even those with adequate technology at home - are simply not engaged in school, she said.

"We're talking about significant learning loss. Months and months and months," she said. "It's a serious equity issue. These kids have a fundamental right to an education, and they're not getting it right now."

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Virus outbreaks unavoidable as school campuses reopen, experts warn

by / Bay City News Service

Uploaded: Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 6:20 pm

As schools inch closer to reopening campuses in some parts of California, medical experts are warning that the spread of the coronavirus will be inevitable and schools need to prepare.

Recent studies have shown that while children infected with the coronavirus are less likely to have symptoms, they often carry larger viral loads and can be "super spreaders," passing the virus to each other, their families and teachers.

And without widespread testing and contact tracing, identifying children who are infected is nearly impossible because most are asymptomatic, doctors said.

"It's very likely that even with careful screening, kids are going to end up in school with infections," said Dr. Dylan Chan, associate professor of otolaryngology (ear and throat medicine) at UC San Francisco. "Schools need to recognize that and get strategies in place."

Schools in some parts of California have reopened or are close to reopening, either because the state has granted them a waiver or their county health officials have given approval. Small in-person classes for students in special education or other high-needs groups have also started in some districts.

Schools that reopen must adhere to the state's strict health and safety protocols that include social distancing, mask requirements, deep cleaning and sending home students who might be sick.

So far, the California Department of Public Health has seen a "very small" number of outbreaks - defined as three or more cases - at K-12 schools that have reopened, according to the department.

Last week, Dr. Mark Galhy, head of the state's Health and Human Services Department, credited the small caseload to schools' and communities' precautionary measures.

"So far, it's encouraging to see the tremendous effort and planning that communities and their schools and their staff have done to make sure that it's lower risk for students and staff alike and ... I think that's encouraging for all of California," he said.

Nonetheless, as more schools open, outbreaks associated with schools will be inevitable -- whether they originate at the school or within the community, according to the Department of Public Health.

"As long as Covid-19 is circulating in communities, it should be expected that cases will be reported in a variety of settings, including among school students, teachers and staff in schools that have reopened for in-person learning," a department spokesperson wrote in an email to EdSource.

"However, these cases may be associated with transmission within schools or community transmission, and there are school and public health plans in place for when COVID-19 occurs at a school, to implement control measures that will limit transmission within schools."

But even the strictest safety protocols might not be enough to prevent infected students from coming to school and unknowingly transmitting the virus to others, according to Chan and his colleagues at UC San Francisco. In studying random coronavirus tests of 30,000 children nationwide, Chan and his team found that the infection rate among children - even if they're asymptomatic - mirrors that of the communities in which they live.

Based on that equation, they developed a tool for schools to determine how many infected students they can expect on campus. For example, in Los Angeles County, a school with 500 students is 98% likely to have at least one student who's infected.

"It's important to note that even in communities with low infection rates, we still found kids with asymptomatic infections," Chan said. "Schools need to focus on reading the risks and protecting people."

Researchers at the Kaiser Family Foundation reached a similar conclusion, saying that outbreaks related to schools reopening may be unavoidable.

"Where there is already widespread community transmission, as is the case in many areas in the U.S., there is clearly a risk of spread associated with reopening schools," according to a Kaiser Family Foundation report published July 29. "This challenge may be more pronounced where testing and contact tracing capacity is limited."

In addition to masks and social distancing, some schools are considering installing ventilation systems that keep air flowing, since research suggests the virus is airborne; holding classes outdoors as weather permits; hiring extra staff to clean classrooms and enforce safety protocols; limiting the number of students in a classroom; and separating desks by 6 feet.

Those steps can help lower, but not eliminate, the risk, according to Laura Flaherty, a policy researcher at the Rand Corporation, a nonprofit research and policy think tank.

"There are a number of ways to reduce the transmission of Covid-19 in schools, although none of these measures take the risk to zero," she said in a video on the Rand website.

Flaherty and her colleagues suggested that schools space students apart as much as possible, expanding classes to other facilities such as libraries and community centers, if necessary; trying a week-on, week-off schedule so students and teachers have some consistency with instruction; having teachers rotate among small groups of students; and hiring tutors to work with students when teachers are unavailable.

A hybrid model of in-person and remote instruction might be one of the most important ways schools can reduce the transmission of Covid-19, researchers at Mathematica, a policy and research firm, found.

Examining 400,000 simulations of possible virus transmission in schools, researchers found that schools can "dramatically" lower the chance of an outbreak by combining a hybrid schedule with strict safety protocols, like wearing masks and eliminating in-person social interactions outside of class.

Researchers also found that temporarily closing schools when an outbreak occurs is a less effective way to control the virus than adopting a hybrid model and enforcing safety protocols to begin with.

But no method is foolproof, researchers said.

"The possibility that schools could exacerbate the pandemic is a serious concern," they said on the Mathematica website. "Every school that is opening its building to students - part time or full time, starting now or later in the school year - needs to prepare for the likelihood that a student or staff member will become infected with COVID-19, and have a plan in place for what to do next."

Still, some believe that the benefits of reopening schools outweigh the risks - especially for students for whom distance learning has been a struggle, or whose parents work.

Distance learning has been a fiasco for too many students, especially those who were already at risk of falling behind, and it exacerbated an achievement gap in California that was among the widest in the country even before the pandemic, said Samantha Tran, senior managing director for education at Children Now, an advocacy and research organization.

Students who lack reliable internet access, technical devices or a quiet place for online learning are falling dangerously behind their peers academically, she said. And many other students - even those with adequate technology at home - are simply not engaged in school, she said.

"We're talking about significant learning loss. Months and months and months," she said. "It's a serious equity issue. These kids have a fundamental right to an education, and they're not getting it right now."

Comments

Christopher Chiang
Registered user
North Bayshore
on Oct 26, 2020 at 3:45 pm
Christopher Chiang, North Bayshore
Registered user
on Oct 26, 2020 at 3:45 pm
11 people like this

Dr. Naomi Bardach, a professor of pediatrics and policy at UCSF said, "When it comes to school reopenings, there are two things to think about: first one is the level of community prevalence" and "the second thing is mitigation strategies...I think this is the right time to do it." she said. "It’s a window of opportunity for kids to get educated." (10/19) Web Link

It is true numbers are going up around the nation, but safety must be examined through local data. Boston's positivity rate is rising, most recently 6.2% of testing. Web Link Yet, Santa Clara County's positivity rate has been under 2% of testing for a month now, 1.6% of testing being the current average (our county is not far from SF that has entered the lowest COVID level-yellow). Web Link

Now maybe our safest and most impactful window to reopen for just those children who need it most (for high need students, daycare to do remote instruction by outsourced providers is not the same thing as in-person instruction by a trained teacher). Any future window won't be as effective as a foundation for student-teacher relationships that fortify future remote learning, nor is there any evidence January-February will be any safer. School habits and attitudes formed in the fall are much harder to change in the spring. Even a month of in-person for our most vulnerable students early in the term can have a big impact.

Our neediest kids deserve a neutral look at the science and health experts to guide reopening. What do the data and experts say:
1) Children infection rates mirror community infection rates, so local info should be the primary driver of reopening. That doesn't mean we ignore other communities. It means we look for communities with similar infection rates to predict what we may see, and also take extra interest in communities with higher rates that have avoided school-based contagion, we need to learn how.

2) School closure is highly disruptive, but not a health metric, closure due to family-based infection (the primary route for children's infection) is the safety procedures working as they should. The metric that should matter is school-based infections. We must carefully study every case of school-based infection. If children come to school sick and their cohort is sent home, -if- there is no school-based infection, no additional children or adults have been placed endanger, however school-based infection is something no community should ever accept. Serving children of essential workers, closures should be anticipated and not seen as proof reopening doesn't work.

3) Reopening for the youngest and highest-need can be done safely if reopening is kept small by focusing on this group, allowing max use of distancing, outdoor space, hospital-level ventilation, access to PPE, and regular testing. All those safety measures are easier to provide now if we triage who needs in-person most. Working with voluntary teachers, in other districts, they found many not able to work inside were willing to work outside.

4) We all benefit from the institutional wisdom gained from piloting small scale reopening, Sunnyvale with similar COVID numbers and demographics as MV is doing this small scale piloting right now. As long as reopening can only be talked about as all or nothing, we miss the critical in-between solutions that should be discussed right now, and the students struggling get lost in the debate on what to do for everyone.

For the majority of MVWSD students, we should be doing everything we can to innovate remote learning. There are so many exciting things possible in remote learning regarding project-based learning and self-directed learning. "Overcoming the Misconceptions of Remote PBL with Young Children" by Sara Lev: Web Link

NY Times: "Schoolchildren Seem Unlikely to Fuel Coronavirus Surges, Scientists Say" (10/22):
Web Link


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.