Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

The corridors of Mountain View High School remain empty after the coronavirus pandemic closed schools in March 2020. The Mountain View-Los Altos school board directed staff last week to plan to bring more students back to campuses when Santa Clara County moves into the state’s “red tier” of public health restrictions. Photo by Sammy Dallal

The Mountain View-Los Altos school board directed staff last week to plan to bring more students back to campuses when Santa Clara County moves into the state’s “red tier” of public health restrictions, a change in the district’s reopening approach.

Trustees agreed at the Jan. 25 meeting that the high schools should open more learning hubs as soon as possible to offer in-person distance support to students who want it. There will be no direct instruction provided but rather adult supervision while students are attending online classes.

“Let’s hire substitutes. Let’s hire people to stay in the classroom. Let’s use our resources to bring people back on campus,” said Trustee Phil Faillace.

This represents a distinct shift in some trustees’ tone about reopening schools. The board approved in December a reopening timeline that continued with full distance learning until Santa Clara County enters the less restrictive orange tier, and trustees did not support Trustee Sanjay Dave’s proposal at the time to offer hybrid instruction once the county is in the red tier.

But last Monday, encouraged by his colleagues’ change of heart, Dave said: “This is music to my ears to hear this consensus. I wish we had this consensus back in December.”

The state’s latest reopening guidance allows schools to reopen for stable groups of 15 students once Santa Clara County has been in the red tier for five days.

Trustees suggested the district prioritize bringing back students who are struggling academically, as well as freshmen who have yet to set foot on their campuses and seniors in their last semester of high school. In district surveys, the “majority of our students and families have stated they want to return,” Superintendent Nellie Meyer told the Voice.

The Los Altos High School main quad is empty during the last week of school on June 2, 2020. Mountain View-Los Altos school board trustees agreed at a meeting last week that the schools should open more learning hubs to offer in-person distance support to students who want it, with no direct instruction provided but rather adult supervision while students are attending online classes. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

The biggest challenge to offering in-person support to more students will be staffing, Meyer told the board, both due to public health restrictions that require smaller class sizes and safety concerns among teachers about returning to work in person. Santa Clara County school leaders continue to wait for concrete information on when teachers and staff will have access to the COVID-19 vaccine.

The district has since sent out a flyer asking parents and other adults to apply to become substitute employees to supervise the in-person support groups.

Before the board’s discussion last week, teachers union president Dave Campbell said the association is “ready and willing to sit down at the negotiating table to continue planning for safe return to school.” He made specific requests, including a list of all health and safety precautions that the schools will implement, how many students can be accommodated in each classroom and a proposed master schedule for each school that lists every student and teacher who would be there in person.

“All teachers would prefer to be in person with our students. What I want is to return to my classroom when it’s safe,” Campbell said.

In an email to the Voice this week, Campbell said he supports the new direction because it “allows those who feel safe with the precautions to return, while those who have concerns to stay home.”

In addition to equipping classrooms with HVAC filters and hand-washing stations, the district has bolstered technology for teachers during school closures, including some who are testing out PolyStudio cameras, which would allow educators to more dynamically teach from their classrooms. The cameras have two settings — one for a fixed location, such as a whiteboard, and one that follows as the teacher moves around the classroom.

Many students continue to struggle during distance learning, according to district data. The number of students earning D’s and F’s at the end of the first semester is still significantly higher than last year, though there was some improvement from the start of the quarter to the end of the semester. At Mountain View High School, 12.6% of students earned D’s and 17% F’s at first semester, compared to 9% and 6.7%, respectively, the year before. At Los Altos High School, 10.8% of students earned D’s and 18.5% earned F’s at first semester compared to 8.6% and 9.4%, respectively, the previous school year.

“There is now plenty of evidence, including our district, of the harm that distance learning is causing, not just in learning, but in their overall mental and physical well-being,” Dave wrote in an email to the Voice. “This is not to state that our teachers are not doing an incredible job on distance learning, jumping through a myriad of issues to create an e-learning curriculum that is as good as many other longstanding e-learning programs. The issue is that most of the students that choose an online school or program, are self-selected and they have the mindset to learn in that medium, but it is not for everyone, and most probably not for most high school students.”

In an interview, Faillace said he was previously in favor of allowing more students to return to campuses for supervised distance learning, not yet hybrid instruction, but didn’t feel it was safe to pursue due to the coronavirus surge during and after the holidays. He sees the learning hubs as an initial “step” toward fuller reopenings.

“The trick here is to implement that approach as safely as possible so that we make it more and more encouraging for teachers to come back. I think we need a path to dealing with the pandemic that gives us opportunities to correct some of the defects inherent in distance learning,” Faillace said.

Although some teachers have asked that schools remain closed until all staff can be vaccinated, he said he doesn’t think that’s necessary.

The high schools’ student school board representatives on Jan. 25 presented a survey they conducted on student satisfaction and engagement during distance learning. Of the roughly 270 students who responded, over 60% rated their motivation as lower during online school, though about 18% said the opposite — that they’re more motivated with distance learning.

About 58% of students rated their current mental health at a one or a two on a scale of one to five, while about 20% of students said their mental health is better now than when they’re attending school in person. Students reported both positive aspects of distance learning — waking up late, more independent work and “school from bed” — as well as the downsides, including too much screen time, difficulty paying attention and connecting with teachers, and “feeling cooped up at home.”

Both student board representatives described a decline in motivation in their own online classes. More students are attending classes with their computer cameras turned off, and Zoom breakout rooms meant to encourage student collaboration have become “more and more quiet,” Mountain View High School senior Erin Coyne said.

“In breakout rooms, we don’t talk,” Los Altos High School senior Riley Capuano added. “I try to start conversations but the decline in students being interested in academic conversations and engaging with their peers has been noticeable for me, especially second semester.”

Meyer acknowledged that students are not immune to “pandemic fatigue.”

“I think you hit it on the nose,” she told the student board representatives. “This is a difficult thing to sustain, and we really want to get out of it.”

The board plans to schedule a special meeting soon to further discuss reopening.

Join the Conversation

19 Comments

  1. I would bet that Special Ed is included (isn’t it a bit already?)
    I’m so glad that I voted and supported Dave as a 2nd term Trustee. Thinks ‘outside the box’ compared to the majority. Pushing for the students & families that want at Least Some in-person learning opportunities. And this is 9-12 grades / where pandemic planning is harder.

    What about the MVWSD (K-8th)? Are they on the Board still ‘thinking’ and not directing? Or are they just ‘acting’, following their Superintendent, rather than Setting Public Policy. Oh well – my youngest is college age, and my family has never been ED or ELL (the students hurting most).

  2. These “learning pods” are helpful in getting kids the ability to see their friends, but it’s just kicking the can down the road on true hybrid and full return to school. The fact that the school board, after 11 months of this, still does not have a true hybrid plan is an absolute joke.

  3. Gerhard – I think you may be missing a subtlety of how Local Education Agencies work. In some ways it is like the way our (MV) City Council works to try to ‘clearly set direction’ for the city staff (especially the City Manager). What the reporter was writing about was this board majority (finally) was giving a Clear Change in Direction to the staff. Why did it take this long? ???? It did not for the Los Altos District and the Palo Alto District. Leadership? Board leadership? (the magic number is 3).

  4. Steven — you’re correct, I don’t understand the mechanics of how decisions there get made. All I know is my kids haven’t seen the inside of a classroom for 11 months, and at the rate our MVLA School Board is going, it could be 2022 before my kids sit in a classroom with their actual teacher.

  5. @Steven Nelson: Yes, there are learning pods back on campus and yes, some of them include students with IEPs (Individual Education Plans). Any kid with an IEP is considered part of special ed. There is another group in the special ed student community — the life skills group —- and they are being overlooked. Many of these students are losing their behavioral gains (which are carefully developed and cultivated by teachers) because they need in person social outlets to keep them strong. They are also missing out on vital job training to make them successful community members. These are things that cannot be done remotely! To get these kids back to the classroom will require social emotional support. That can start simply by having them meet their teachers in small groups outside to “walk and talk” on the track. This would allow teachers to address behaviors, reinforce social distancing rules as well as mask wearing and get acquainted with freshman they’ve only seen over Zoom. This has been proposed to the administration more than once to no avail. Why? It seems to be more important to bring back the football players and focus on kids who gather and spread the virus instead. If we’re going to claim to be an inclusive community, we can’t leave out the Life Skills students!

  6. Kristine of Cuesta Park – thanks for the public summary of Special Ed in this Pandemic. I myself know most of the IEP, Special Day Class, highest possible inclusion level [I know that ‘phrase’ may not be quite exact) from my own teacher credential training back in 2003 – and the several years I did day substitute teaching – sometimes filling-in for SE teachers (those aides were an increadable/important blessing). Trustees do not get this training!

    Who is the MVLA Trustee In Charge of Special Ed liason? Is there NONE? Board get your rears in motion and APPOINT ONE! Fiona Walter – are you statewide CSBA President yet! Please get your head out of those clouds – and your eyes back on the local ground. Local Students are in desperate need. Some of your Most Needy – “Trustee”.

Leave a comment