News

State bill seeks to take politics out of VTA governance

Assemblyman Marc Berman's proposal would abolish current practice of giving elected leaders oversight

Introduced Feb. 18, Assembly Bill 1091 seeks to replace elected leaders on the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority board of directors with appointed members of the public. Embarcadero Media file photo by Magali Gauthier.

Responding to years of complaints about poor governance at the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, state Assemblyman Marc Berman has introduced a bill that would shift oversight of the agency away from politicians and toward appointed experts.

The proposal that Berman, D-Menlo Park, introduced Thursday would also reduce the number of voting members on the VTA board of directors from 12 to nine. Five of them would be appointed by Santa Clara County. The other four would be split between the city of San Jose, which would get two seats, and the other county cities, which would get the other two.

Of the two seats not controlled by San Jose, one would go to a resident of Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Mountain View, Milpitas, Palo Alto or Sunnyvale. The other seat would go to a resident of Campbell, Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, Santa Clara or Saratoga.

In introducing the legislation, known as Assembly Bill 1091, the former Palo Alto City Council member pointed to three separate civil grand jury reports over the past 20 years that have concluded that the VTA's governance structure is a "root cause of the agency's poor performance."

The most recent of these, which came out in June 2019, concluded that the VTA board suffers from a lack of experience and, in many cases, lack of engagement by some directors. The grand jury also found that the board is dominated "in terms of numbers, seniority and influence" by representatives of Santa Clara County and San Jose and that there is "frequent tension" between board members' fiduciary duties to the VTA and the political demands of their local elected positions.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

The grand jury also concluded that under the current system, appointees to the VTA board "often lack a basic understanding of VTA's operations and transportation issues, generally."

Berman's proposed legislation seeks to remove some of the politics from the transportation agency by replacing elected directors with appointed members of the public. Under his proposal, these members would be appointed to four-year terms. Each would have to demonstrate relevant professional experience in transportation, accounting or finance, infrastructure or project management and executive management, according to Berman's announcement.

Assemblyman Marc Berman, D-Menlo Park, is proposing reforms to the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority board of directors, such as the appointment of members to four-year terms. Courtesy Assemblyman Marc Berman.

Berman noted that the agency provides "essential public transit options that help get Santa Clara County's two million residents to and from work, school, and home."

"Taxpayers, transit riders, and VTA staff deserve a board of directors that have the interest and ability to dedicate the time necessary to provide appropriate oversight and meet our region's complex transportation needs," Berman said in the announcement.

The debate over VTA governance has become a more urgent topic since the 2016 passage of Measure B, a tax measure that includes $6.3 billion in funding for transportation projects across the county. These include the extension of BART to San Jose, grade separation for Caltrain's electrified cars in Palo Alto, Mountain View and Sunnyvale, and various improvements to streets, highways, expressways and bike routes throughout the county.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Last fall, many city and county officials pushed back against VTA staff after the agency proposed a scenario in which virtually all of the funding over the next 10 years would be devoted to BART extension. After fierce criticism from the county Board of Supervisors and local communities, the VTA pulled away from that scenario in January.

The VTA's process for electing members remains opaque and, at times, contentious. The cities of Palo Alto, Mountain View, Los Altos and Los Altos Hills currently get one seat on the VTA board and they fill that seat on a rotation basis, with each city getting a chance to have one of its elected members on the board.

Despite the critical importance of the VTA in distributing transportation funds and providing transit services, appointments to the board are made in private meetings with no opportunities for members of the public to weigh in. Last month, in one such meeting, the group of cities selected Palo Alto Vice Mayor Pat Burt to represent it on the VTA board for the coming year. That decision followed a tussle among Palo Alto City Council members over whether Burt or council member Alison Cormack should be the board representative.

While Cormack was the council's initial choice for the position, council members voted to nominate Burt after two former council members who had championed Cormack's nomination — Liz Kniss and Adrian Fine — concluded their council terms last December.

If Berman's proposed legislation gets adopted, the VTA reforms would take effect on July 1, 2022.

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

State bill seeks to take politics out of VTA governance

Assemblyman Marc Berman's proposal would abolish current practice of giving elected leaders oversight

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 9:30 am

Responding to years of complaints about poor governance at the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, state Assemblyman Marc Berman has introduced a bill that would shift oversight of the agency away from politicians and toward appointed experts.

The proposal that Berman, D-Menlo Park, introduced Thursday would also reduce the number of voting members on the VTA board of directors from 12 to nine. Five of them would be appointed by Santa Clara County. The other four would be split between the city of San Jose, which would get two seats, and the other county cities, which would get the other two.

Of the two seats not controlled by San Jose, one would go to a resident of Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Mountain View, Milpitas, Palo Alto or Sunnyvale. The other seat would go to a resident of Campbell, Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, Santa Clara or Saratoga.

In introducing the legislation, known as Assembly Bill 1091, the former Palo Alto City Council member pointed to three separate civil grand jury reports over the past 20 years that have concluded that the VTA's governance structure is a "root cause of the agency's poor performance."

The most recent of these, which came out in June 2019, concluded that the VTA board suffers from a lack of experience and, in many cases, lack of engagement by some directors. The grand jury also found that the board is dominated "in terms of numbers, seniority and influence" by representatives of Santa Clara County and San Jose and that there is "frequent tension" between board members' fiduciary duties to the VTA and the political demands of their local elected positions.

The grand jury also concluded that under the current system, appointees to the VTA board "often lack a basic understanding of VTA's operations and transportation issues, generally."

Berman's proposed legislation seeks to remove some of the politics from the transportation agency by replacing elected directors with appointed members of the public. Under his proposal, these members would be appointed to four-year terms. Each would have to demonstrate relevant professional experience in transportation, accounting or finance, infrastructure or project management and executive management, according to Berman's announcement.

Berman noted that the agency provides "essential public transit options that help get Santa Clara County's two million residents to and from work, school, and home."

"Taxpayers, transit riders, and VTA staff deserve a board of directors that have the interest and ability to dedicate the time necessary to provide appropriate oversight and meet our region's complex transportation needs," Berman said in the announcement.

The debate over VTA governance has become a more urgent topic since the 2016 passage of Measure B, a tax measure that includes $6.3 billion in funding for transportation projects across the county. These include the extension of BART to San Jose, grade separation for Caltrain's electrified cars in Palo Alto, Mountain View and Sunnyvale, and various improvements to streets, highways, expressways and bike routes throughout the county.

Last fall, many city and county officials pushed back against VTA staff after the agency proposed a scenario in which virtually all of the funding over the next 10 years would be devoted to BART extension. After fierce criticism from the county Board of Supervisors and local communities, the VTA pulled away from that scenario in January.

The VTA's process for electing members remains opaque and, at times, contentious. The cities of Palo Alto, Mountain View, Los Altos and Los Altos Hills currently get one seat on the VTA board and they fill that seat on a rotation basis, with each city getting a chance to have one of its elected members on the board.

Despite the critical importance of the VTA in distributing transportation funds and providing transit services, appointments to the board are made in private meetings with no opportunities for members of the public to weigh in. Last month, in one such meeting, the group of cities selected Palo Alto Vice Mayor Pat Burt to represent it on the VTA board for the coming year. That decision followed a tussle among Palo Alto City Council members over whether Burt or council member Alison Cormack should be the board representative.

While Cormack was the council's initial choice for the position, council members voted to nominate Burt after two former council members who had championed Cormack's nomination — Liz Kniss and Adrian Fine — concluded their council terms last December.

If Berman's proposed legislation gets adopted, the VTA reforms would take effect on July 1, 2022.

Comments

Waldo
Registered user
Waverly Park
on Feb 22, 2021 at 2:51 pm
Waldo, Waverly Park
Registered user
on Feb 22, 2021 at 2:51 pm

Thanks to Assemblyman Berman for his well researched efforts to fix the VTA.


Steven Nelson
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on Feb 22, 2021 at 4:48 pm
Steven Nelson, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on Feb 22, 2021 at 4:48 pm

About time. Now ... how to fix that darn VTA STAFF?
(BTW - write to the Assembly Transportation Committee Chair / powerful / Laura Friedman Capitol Office, Room 6011
PO Box 942849 Sacramento, CA 94249-0043
(919) 319-2043. IMO, mail and phone calls are usually answered by real people (staffers).

Their Committee Rules, Bill Management "1) Bills referred to the Committee will be scheduled for a hearing at the discression of the Chair." Most bills are KILLED DEAD by committee chairs / be warned long suffering residents of No. County! So be especially nice to Chair Friedman and her staff!


SRB
Registered user
St. Francis Acres
on Feb 22, 2021 at 6:26 pm
SRB, St. Francis Acres
Registered user
on Feb 22, 2021 at 6:26 pm

Agree with long overdue need to reform VTA, not sure that proposal is the right way to go:
1. The board quality is still at the mercy of politicians.
2. By appointing non elected board members , there is even less accountability (voters pass tax measures but can't remove the board in case of mis-management)
A better and simpler approach might be direct election of the VTA Board by District (as BART does).


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.