News

Guest opinion: Protect families from homelessness. Extend the eviction moratorium.

A woman walks through The Americana apartment complex on Aug. 21, 2019. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

I live and work in Silicon Valley, one of the most expensive places to live in the country. According to Zillow, the average price of a home is $1.3 million.

But buried deep in this large swath of land, known for its dynamism and innovation, is East Palo Alto, a working-class Latino community where my extended family still lives.

During a pandemic where giant tech corporations saw record-breaking profits, people in my community saw record-breaking panic. High transmission rates of COVID-19 among the Latino community came because of factors like preexisting health conditions, type of employment and overcrowded housing.

As someone who grew up in a multigenerational working-class household, the scene playing out in East Palo Alto and other Latino Silicon Valley neighborhoods is one I understand. Families in these households were faced with the most challenging decision this past year — stay home to avoid exposure to the virus or lose the paycheck that helps pay the nearly unaffordable rent.

Right now, California has protective legislation in place that prohibits eviction and foreclosure for nonpayment of rent or mortgage during the COVID-19 period. It also eliminates debt for tenants who were unable to pay rent during the pandemic. Finally, it compensates small landlords and nonprofit housing operators who need assistance to ensure housing stability for their tenants.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Join

Although California has these protections in place, saving millions of Californians from losing homes by protecting tenants from evictions due to missed rent, this protection ends in June. Hope is on the horizon with vaccination rates ticking up, but the financial impact of COVID-19 rages on.

This problem is echoed across the state as Californians have lost more jobs during COVID-19 than during the Great Recession, and unemployment is higher among Californians of color.

The urgency to extend eviction protections could not come at a more crucial time, especially since many of the people I serve at Nuestra Casa, a local nonprofit serving the Latino community in Silicon Valley, have lost jobs and have no income. Rent debt is growing at a staggering rate.

Unfortunately, this crisis requires systemic, longer-term interventions. At a minimum, California must extend the moratorium past June for people still impacted by the pandemic. Many people will not be able to return to work by then.

At a local level, thousands in San Mateo County receive support from robust rental assistance programs. But the scale of this problem is beyond those programs' scope, and these resources are quickly exhausted. The application process is also complicated, especially for residents with limited time and English proficiency.

One step in the right direction is the California Legislature's approval of Senate Bill 91. SB 91 authorizes the use of $2.6 billion in federal funds to pay landlords rent owed by qualifying tenants with COVID-19 financial hardships. Some of these funds will also go to organizations with deep roots in communities, like Nuestra Casa, to help tenants complete complicated rental assistance applications.

By extending the moratorium, we can ensure that rental assistance money achieves its intended purpose, preventing homelessness and getting money into the pockets of landlords who need it.

As a next step to address what was already a severe housing crisis before COVID-19, why not apply the same approach to keeping people housed during the pandemic? California can be a leader in a model that prioritizes getting the rent paid, preventing evictions and reducing homelessness, rather than prioritizing speedy evictions where landlords do not get the rent money owed.

If we don't continue these interventions, vulnerable families living in Silicon Valley will be pushed out for good. They will be forced to choose between food or housing. Evictions will also increase the spread of COVID-19 and other health conditions, further harming all of us.

California can do the right thing. It can choose to look away and let this problem fester in our communities. Or it can choose people like my family and my neighbors — renters, homeowners, small landlords and essential workers.

Because in the Golden State, the fifth-largest economy in the world, everyone deserves a place to call home.

Miriam Yupanqui is the executive director of Nuestra Casa de East Palo Alto and can be reached at [email protected] This piece was first published by CalMatters, a nonpartisan, nonprofit journalism venture that works with media partners throughout the state, including the Mountain View Voice.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important covid news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

Guest opinion: Protect families from homelessness. Extend the eviction moratorium.

by / CalMatters

Uploaded: Sun, May 9, 2021, 8:52 am

I live and work in Silicon Valley, one of the most expensive places to live in the country. According to Zillow, the average price of a home is $1.3 million.

But buried deep in this large swath of land, known for its dynamism and innovation, is East Palo Alto, a working-class Latino community where my extended family still lives.

During a pandemic where giant tech corporations saw record-breaking profits, people in my community saw record-breaking panic. High transmission rates of COVID-19 among the Latino community came because of factors like preexisting health conditions, type of employment and overcrowded housing.

As someone who grew up in a multigenerational working-class household, the scene playing out in East Palo Alto and other Latino Silicon Valley neighborhoods is one I understand. Families in these households were faced with the most challenging decision this past year — stay home to avoid exposure to the virus or lose the paycheck that helps pay the nearly unaffordable rent.

Right now, California has protective legislation in place that prohibits eviction and foreclosure for nonpayment of rent or mortgage during the COVID-19 period. It also eliminates debt for tenants who were unable to pay rent during the pandemic. Finally, it compensates small landlords and nonprofit housing operators who need assistance to ensure housing stability for their tenants.

Although California has these protections in place, saving millions of Californians from losing homes by protecting tenants from evictions due to missed rent, this protection ends in June. Hope is on the horizon with vaccination rates ticking up, but the financial impact of COVID-19 rages on.

This problem is echoed across the state as Californians have lost more jobs during COVID-19 than during the Great Recession, and unemployment is higher among Californians of color.

The urgency to extend eviction protections could not come at a more crucial time, especially since many of the people I serve at Nuestra Casa, a local nonprofit serving the Latino community in Silicon Valley, have lost jobs and have no income. Rent debt is growing at a staggering rate.

Unfortunately, this crisis requires systemic, longer-term interventions. At a minimum, California must extend the moratorium past June for people still impacted by the pandemic. Many people will not be able to return to work by then.

At a local level, thousands in San Mateo County receive support from robust rental assistance programs. But the scale of this problem is beyond those programs' scope, and these resources are quickly exhausted. The application process is also complicated, especially for residents with limited time and English proficiency.

One step in the right direction is the California Legislature's approval of Senate Bill 91. SB 91 authorizes the use of $2.6 billion in federal funds to pay landlords rent owed by qualifying tenants with COVID-19 financial hardships. Some of these funds will also go to organizations with deep roots in communities, like Nuestra Casa, to help tenants complete complicated rental assistance applications.

By extending the moratorium, we can ensure that rental assistance money achieves its intended purpose, preventing homelessness and getting money into the pockets of landlords who need it.

As a next step to address what was already a severe housing crisis before COVID-19, why not apply the same approach to keeping people housed during the pandemic? California can be a leader in a model that prioritizes getting the rent paid, preventing evictions and reducing homelessness, rather than prioritizing speedy evictions where landlords do not get the rent money owed.

If we don't continue these interventions, vulnerable families living in Silicon Valley will be pushed out for good. They will be forced to choose between food or housing. Evictions will also increase the spread of COVID-19 and other health conditions, further harming all of us.

California can do the right thing. It can choose to look away and let this problem fester in our communities. Or it can choose people like my family and my neighbors — renters, homeowners, small landlords and essential workers.

Because in the Golden State, the fifth-largest economy in the world, everyone deserves a place to call home.

Miriam Yupanqui is the executive director of Nuestra Casa de East Palo Alto and can be reached at [email protected] This piece was first published by CalMatters, a nonpartisan, nonprofit journalism venture that works with media partners throughout the state, including the Mountain View Voice.

Comments

Dave Smith
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on May 9, 2021 at 8:26 pm
Dave Smith, Old Mountain View
Registered user
on May 9, 2021 at 8:26 pm

It is funny all these people who want evictions stop don’t understand that in most cases it hurts the average middle class.. I personally know of 3-4 people who owns a second home as rental property they they pay mortgage on. BUT they not longer get rent for over 6 months.. who pays the mortgage? They still do. The banks don’t care. Folks like this editorial thinks it is an unnamed corporation that just has less profits. It is not! Most people who can’t afford rent don’t rent from high priced REITS! They rent from hard working middle class who scraped to buy a 2nd home or small apt complex as income and still paying a mortgage.. SO PLEASE stop with the progressive banter!!!!!


Dan Waylonis
Registered user
Jackson Park
on May 10, 2021 at 3:58 pm
Dan Waylonis, Jackson Park
Registered user
on May 10, 2021 at 3:58 pm

I agree with @Dave Smith. Any direct meddling into the market produces unintended consequences. History shows it over and over without fail. The fairest method to support people in need would be to give them money and let them choose how and where to spend it.


Snowgret
Registered user
Rex Manor
on May 10, 2021 at 5:29 pm
Snowgret, Rex Manor
Registered user
on May 10, 2021 at 5:29 pm

She did not say she wanted evictions to stop and landlords not get paid. She suggested “we can ensure that rental assistance money achieves its intended purpose, preventing homelessness and getting money into the pockets of landlords who need it”. She’s advocating for low income folks but not at the cost of landlords not getting rent money. In your replies you focus on the landlords needing to get paid rent due them but do t even address the very real problems of people not having jobs and not being able to pay their rent. Why not focus on helping BOTH, as she suggests?


Steven Nelson
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on May 16, 2021 at 2:29 pm
Steven Nelson, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on May 16, 2021 at 2:29 pm

I am not at all sure I want the goverment (Cal EDD, County Social Services) intervening in the housing economy even more, using this really untried format Long Term. An Emergency Measure is by nature short term. Like Emergency Evacuation of a workplace to avoid Toxic Material DEATH (I worked with organic arsenic gas compounds), is not the same as a Workplace Safe Materials Handling and Containment System [love good CAL OSHA regulation programs].

Who in the State Legislature is working on new and good (viable longterm econimic models) legislation on rental housing/eviction reduction?

I used to be, for 20 years, a 'small middle class landlord' of a duplex. In exchange for 'deferred tropical and snow sking vacations,' fancy cars, and also investment of literal "sweat equity" I was able to cash out and pay off my family home 30 year mortage early.

Now - would ALL MIDDLE CLASS HOMEOWNERS be willing to give up Half of their goverment subsidized mortage tax break? This has been one of the USA's most expensive poor-to-rich wealth tranfer schemes over the last half centuary. A big reason why - Family Wealth of homeowner is (I think) 10X Family Wealth of renter-families.

End "socialism" for homeowners? Even, reduce it by half? (and fix that corporate income tax Trump mistake?)


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.