Transit comes first at VTA, but the San Jose agency sees a big future in residential real estate.
Earlier this month, VTA announced several significant updates about housing projects being built on agency-owned land, also known as transit-oriented developments (TODs).
On March 9, California invested $29 million to build a 569-unit housing project near Tamien Station in San Jose. A few days prior, VTA's board of directors agreed to seek a developer to build a housing project near Winchester Station in Campbell with up to 105 residential spaces.
By leasing surplus land near light rail stations to private developers or government housing agencies, VTA hopes to collect steady revenue from leases and new riders. The transportation agency sees this as a strategy to address the regional housing shortage and its own financial problems.
"Sustainable sources of revenue, such as income from transit-oriented developments, really creates a long-term stable revenue source that can be utilized for increasing and improving services," Jessie O'Malley Solis, VTA's project manager for these developments, told San Jose Spotlight.
The agency is betting big on this vision: VTA currently has nine residential projects in various stages of progress or completion in San Jose, Mountain View and Gilroy. VTA has 25 total sites eligible for future development. By 2040, the agency anticipates it will have more than 7,000 residences--2,500 listed as affordable--garnering almost $60 million per year in additional revenue.
Housing stock adds revenue
The agency completed two of these projects in San Jose the 1990s--one near Almaden Station and another near Ohlone Chynoweth Station. Solis said VTA created an official policy in 2009 for creating transit developments and hired personnel to expand the agency's housing portfolio.
"We've been at the planning stages for a few years, and now we're really ramping up and hitting the implementation phase of our program," Solis said. "We've got a nice pipeline, and I'm really looking forward to a lot of groundbreakings in the near term."
County Supervisor Cindy Chavez, who sits on the VTA board, said the agency updated its policy in 2016 to ensure at least 35 percent of the transit development homes are affordable to people making 60 percent of the area median income, which in Santa Clara County is more than $151,000.
"What I really appreciate about the whole transit-oriented development approach is it meets multiple outcomes for the public," Chavez told San Jose Spotlight, noting these projects provide housing, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and make light rail and buses more accessible.
Transit advocate and San Jose Spotlight columnist Monica Mallon said these developments are a good idea, but she's skeptical they'll add significant revenue from new riders. Land lease agreements for the developments will provide reliable income for the agency, she added. That's critical for VTA, which has high operational costs.
"We're in a better financial situation, but we're not in a perfect one," Mallon told San Jose Spotlight. "Every single dollar we can get from any source for operations is really important to go after."
Former San Jose Councilmember and VTA board member Johnny Khamis said he is generally supportive of transit-oriented developments, but noted they pose challenges like any housing project. He supported a transit-oriented development near Blossom Hill Road, but opposed one near Ohlone Chynoweth Station because it would impact parking at the nearby Westfield Oakridge Mall.
Revenue streams
Khamis, who is running for the county District 1 supervisor seat, doesn't believe transit-oriented developments will address the agency's greater underlying financial issues, such as its high operations expenditures. Last year, the agency projected its expenses will exceed revenues by $47.5 million by 2031. VTA has also grappled with low ridership during the pandemic. The agency had to suspend rail operations for several months after an employee killed nine workers at the Guadalupe rail yard.
"Unless they get an understanding of what they need to do to fix the problem of why nobody wants to ride light rail, these new housing projects aren't going to keep them out of the hole," Khamis told San Jose Spotlight.
State Sen. Dave Cortese said he's worked with many VTA board members who have fretted about increasing fares. He noted raising ticket prices causes people to stop riding, triggering a financial downward spiral.
"It's smart to diversify your revenue portfolio and take advantage of land available for affordable housing," he told San Jose Spotlight.
Last year, Cortese introduced a bill signed into law, Senate Bill 791, which created a special unit in the state department of housing to help local agencies like VTA develop surplus land into housing.
"It's not going to solve the housing crisis, but it's a major piece of the puzzle in terms of using everything we have available to us," he said.
This story was originally published by San Jose Spotlight here.
Comments
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Mar 24, 2022 at 5:51 pm
Registered user
on Mar 24, 2022 at 5:51 pm
People who need VTA to get to work came to realize during that several month's shutdown that VTA did not see dependability as one of its primary functions. It was fortunate, if that's the word for it, that the shutdown was during a time of very low transit usage. Indeed, the reason given for the shutdown is horrifying especially when caused by an employee with access privileges. But so was 9/11 and other urban disasters over the years.
It's well known that suburbia cannot have a usual transit system that remotely makes costs. And presently wouldn't even if the vehicles did not require an operator. But much of the area is urbanizing. Further, transit has quantifiable benefits like less traffic, emissions, land area used for cars, etc, that could be at least approximated for us to keep in mind when we see transit system's operating numbers. Transit may actually be more economic than it appears. Not planning transportation, including land, when urbanizing will be an expensive error. Already the overall costs and times needed are making backbone transit construction less and less possible. The costs of BART expansion to San Jose are an example. Running Caltrain to the new SF transit center will likely never be done.