Mountain View’s Rental Housing Committee will soon be made up of almost an entirely new roster. Five fresh faces are set to fill three soon-to-expire terms and two vacancies on the city body, and the city council decided Tuesday evening who those five will be.
A pool of nine Mountain View residents applied for the five open seats, which consist of two full, four-year terms that will open after the current members’ seats expire in April; two unexpired seats created by vacancies with terms that end in 2025; and one alternate member.
During the March 7 interviews conducted by the city council, candidates were asked to talk about the biggest issues they see facing the Rental Housing Committee in the future. Nearly all the candidates touched on ratio-utility billing systems, or RUBS, which the committee already established as a top work plan priority for the next couple years.
RUBS is an alternative utility billing method that landlords can implement in rental properties with multiple units. It essentially takes the cost of utilities for the whole building and divides it among tenants based on a formula, which takes into account things like square footage of each unit or number of occupants. But because this system doesn’t track the exact usage for each tenant, it can lead to billing disputes if someone feels they’re being overcharged.
Some cities like San Jose have outright banned RUBS for rent-controlled units. Mountain View’s Rental Housing Committee is currently in the process of collecting stakeholder input through a series of public meetings to figure out what direction the city should go.
These are the five candidates the council selected for the open seats, and where they landed on hot button items like RUBS, as well as other issues.
Robert Cox: full term
A 28-year resident of Mountain View, Robert Cox is no stranger to sitting on city advisory bodies: he previously served on the Environmental Planning Commission for eight years. As a longtime resident, and someone who rented for most of his life, Cox said he has seen first-hand how the changing housing market in Silicon Valley has made it harder for low income residents to stay in the city.
Today, Cox owns a home that he lives in in Mountain View, but does not own or manage any other properties. Each candidate had to disclose this information on their application, because the committee has a rule that it cannot include more than two members who own or manage any rental property or are a real estate agent or developer.
During his interview, Cox identified RUBS as a top issue. He said he believes “(utilities) need to be paid for, but not on the backs of the people who are least able to pay,” and he supported the committee’s current approach of gathering stakeholder input.
Cox added that as the city tries to move toward climate neutrality, requiring green appliances will come with its own set of challenges that the committee will have to face.
“Getting rid of gas and using more electric, how can we phase this into multifamily units in a way that lives up to our principles but doesn’t break the back of the people who have to pay it?” he said.
Cox was one of two applicants to receive unanimous support from council during the first round of voting, so he secured one of the two full, four-year terms that were up for grabs.
Edie Keating: full term
The other four-year term went to Edie Keating, who also snagged a vote from every council member.
Keating said she’s been a renter her whole adult life before buying a condo in Mountain View a year ago. In her application, Keating said she believes rent stabilization is a good policy for any city, and said she’s been present at nearly every RHC meeting since they started in 2017.
Keating also identified RUBS as a top issue.
“We really are not following the CSFRA with our current process of allowing utility billing that’s distributed, but it’s on behalf of the landlord, because it’s really having rent changes every month and only one annual change in rent is allowed,” Keating said.
She said that Mountain View should look to San Jose as an example for how to move forward on issues with RUBS.
Keating also brought up concerns that the city’s rental unit registry rules, which require landlords to register their units with the city, currently have low compliance.
“Once we have more compliance, and the question is how to get that, then we’ll have really interesting data that may bring up other questions that deserve research,” she said.
Kirin Madison: partial term
After Keating and Cox, Mountain View renter Kirin Madison was the next top vote getter, securing support from five of the seven council members. Madison secured one of the two vacant seats that were up for grabs, which means her term will end in 2025.
Having been a renter in places as different as New York, San Francisco, Sacramento, and now Mountain View, Madison said she brings a wide-ranging perspective about the challenges that renters face.
“Issues such as rent stabilization may not be as prominent in Sacramento, where prices are affordable,” Madison wrote in her application. “However, in San Francisco, rent stabilization could be the difference between someone maintaining housing for another year or being forced into the street. As a Mountain View resident, I want to help make the rental process manageable under the CSFRA.”
A law clerk by trade, Madison said she wants to bring that experience into the committee, which was created to implement the city’s rent control law. Like many fellow candidates, she identified RUBS as a top issue.
“As it currently stands, RUBS does not work,” Madison said. “On the landlord side, it constantly brings them in violation of the rent adjustments, and on the tenant side, it actually gives an uncertainty to the amount of money that they would be paying from month to month.”
Madison said the RHC needs to find a middle ground that’s balanced for both sides.
Kevin Ma: partial term
The other vacant seat went to Kevin Ma, a recent renter and now Mountain View condo owner. Like Madison, Ma’s partial term will expire in 2025.
As a member of the Los Altos-Mountain View League of Women Voters’ Housing Committee, Ma said he has closely monitored the activities of the Rental Housing Committee over the years.
Like his fellow candidates, he identified RUBS as a top issue, but also spoke about the push for greener appliances and making sure that tenants know their rights.
When it comes to RUBS, Ma said, “it may involve exploring what other jurisdictions with rent control, like Berkeley, about how they’re doing it. Because as the saying goes, justice delayed is justice denied. But the purpose of the RHC is to make sure there is balance, that no one is getting screwed in the process.”
Alex Brown: alternate
In addition to its five core members, the RHC fills an alternate seat just in case a member vacates their seat early. After a couple tiebreaker rounds, Mountain View resident and mobile home owner Alex Brown came out victorious for the alternate seat.
Addressing RUBS, Brown said “it’s up to the community and the RHC to come to a decision” on the issue, which he said is already being done through the committee’s series of stakeholder meetings.
“I think progress is already being made,” he said.
Brown added that, when it comes to issues of electrification, the city needs to partner with property owners to make it happen.
The five new members will be officially added to the RHC roster after the city council makes their appointment official at a March 28 meeting.
Comments
Registered user
Jackson Park
on Mar 8, 2023 at 2:53 pm
Registered user
on Mar 8, 2023 at 2:53 pm
Are there any criteria to measure the success of Mountain View interfering with market forces? Or is this just a "feel-good" program to make it seem like the city is doing "something"?
Registered user
North Bayshore
on Mar 8, 2023 at 3:00 pm
Registered user
on Mar 8, 2023 at 3:00 pm
Hey Dan,
You can find information about success criteria and metrics on the city's website.
I'll try to link it here:
Web Link
If that is pruned, you should be able to search for "Informational Materials and Reports" and follow the top result, then re-navigate with the leftnav to the right page (under Outreach and Information).
-Alex
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Mar 8, 2023 at 4:11 pm
Registered user
on Mar 8, 2023 at 4:11 pm
If we want more rentals, why do we make it so hard in MV to become a landlord?
Is the Community Stabilization and Fair Rent Act designed to make sure rent is fair, or is it to make things better for renters and not for the landlords? I think a fair commission to be 1/2 landlords of all sizes and 1/2 renters, but that is explicitly disallowed in the rules that say no more than 2 people can actually work in the very business we're talking about.
Registered user
Waverly Park
on Mar 8, 2023 at 4:18 pm
Registered user
on Mar 8, 2023 at 4:18 pm
Letting the City Council choose the members of the Rental Property Committee is equivalent to letting the Fox guard the hen house. The Council is pro-rent control and anti-eviction of any renter, no matter how bad a tenant. So they'll choose like minds and let MV rental housing get paralyzed and rot due to lack of upkeep and destructive residents.
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Mar 10, 2023 at 9:03 pm
Registered user
on Mar 10, 2023 at 9:03 pm
Just an Observation,
If landlords do not provide qualified people to be considered for the RHC, that is their problem.
The fact is there is no REQUIREMENT for 2 of the 5 members to be from invested conflict of interest.
Sorry but because of past abuse of the tenants of Mountain View, the CSFRA was passed. And Measure D attempts to remove protections failed by more than a 2 to 1 margin in votes.
Remember any market can be regulated no matter what. And yes property values are crashing and some landlords paid too much to start a business. Thus they are underwater. But since that is an INVESTMENT and NOT a PRIMARY RESIDENCE, they gambled and looks like they got a high card 10 in poker.
Just stop complaining and deal with your business.
David Avny of 184 Centre Street paid $5M to buy a 60+ year old building, he in the 6 years owning it had the building depreciate by 45% and now he is trying to sell it as a legal apartment.
BUT IT IS ILLEGAL AND HE KNOWS IT IN 2015 because it is in a R3.1 residential zone and not a R4. Any certificate of occupancy must comply with land zones to be legal. Here is proof of prior knowledge, before he filed a rental agreement without disclosing the zone nonconformity.
Web Link
And the building is starting to fail because of bad renovating causing structural damage.
So time for the City to be properly protected from out of town landlords that knew what they were doing was illegal.