News

'Getting back to business': Mountain View's budget looks strong in post-pandemic rebound

Mountain View is in the process of approving its next 2023-24 budget. Photo by Michelle Le

According to Mountain View City Manager Kimbra McCarty, the city has “clearly emerged from the pandemic” – at least financially speaking.

Mountain View officials presented the proposed city budget for the next fiscal year at a June 13 council meeting. With city tax revenues rebounding and even surpassing pre-pandemic numbers, McCarthy said Mountain View is ready to get “back to business.”

The budget includes line items for a new city housing department, a paid parental leave pilot program for city staff, long-awaited capital improvement projects like rehabilitating the public safety building, and making good on promises to increase parks and open space in the city.

City Manager Kimbra McCarthy. Courtesy city of Mountain View.

“We are more resilient than ever before,” McCarthy said.

Mountain View's stable financial position can be partly attributed to the city’s diverse revenue streams. As is the case with most jurisdictions, property taxes represent the largest chunk of the city’s general fund, at just more than 41%, or $74.6 million projected for fiscal year 2023-24. But unlike other cities, Mountain View also gets a significant portion of its money from property that it owns – some $28 million.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

“Mountain View owns and leases land to various corporate and other businesses, and this is in the form of rents and leases that the city receives, making it a little bit unique from other cities in the area,” said Finance and Administrative Services Director Derek Rampone at the meeting. “The fact that the city has these additional resources has helped, over time, maintain some of the financial stability of the city, especially recently.”

Proposed 2023-24 general operating fund revenues for the city of Mountain View. Courtesy city of Mountain View.

Even with Mountain View’s strong financial position, McCarthy said the city will need to raise more funds to accomplish everything it wants to do in the years ahead, including the possibility of a ballot measure.

“This council was very prudent in putting a potential revenue measure on our work plan to think about in 2024, because we have a lot of very significant needs that we’re going to need to address in the future,” McCarthy said. "One of the most significant pressing issues that we have right now is the rehabilitation of our public safety building; also the rehabilitation of two fire stations that are very, very old and in need of repair."

If such a measure were to make it on the ballot next year and pass, in addition to addressing the aging public safety facilities, it would allow the city to add new parks and open spaces, implement decarbonization programs and build more affordable housing, the proposed budget states.

Proposed 2023-24 general operating fund expenditures for the city of Mountain View. Courtesy city of Mountain View.

McCarthy said one of the most critical recommendations in the budget is the creation of a new city housing department, and specifically funding a new fulltime senior housing officer position.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

“You all are aware that you just passed the housing element and thankfully we were also certified by the state,” McCarthy said as she addressed council Tuesday night. “Part of that involves 22 new projects as part of the housing element. So the new housing department is really necessary because we’re going to have to work on not only the current projects in the pipeline but also these 22 new projects that are in the housing element.”

There’s also nine projects and three land dedications specifically for affordable housing that are on the horizon in Mountain View, a total of about 1,300 units – projects that the new housing department will help manage and bring to fruition.

The city’s strong finances were also evidenced by new pilot programs built into the budget to promote staff mental wellness.

One is a new paid parental leave program that will offer staff who birth, foster or adopt a child up to eight weeks of paid leave. The pilot program is open to any new parent or guardian, not just the person who gives birth, McCarthy said. The annual estimated cost of such a program is $500,000, but the city’s setting aside $1 million in the budget to add some cushion and see how many people utilize the program.

“One of the things that we really want to focus on especially over this next year is continuing to build our great culture,” McCarthy said of the new program.

The city’s also setting aside $135,000 for mental wellness that will be split proportionally across departments. McCarthy said it will be largely up to individual departments to decide how they want to spend that money.

In addition to the public hearing for the 2023-24 budget, the council approved its strategic work plan for fiscal years 2023-24 and 2024-25 at the June 13 meeting. Top priority projects include everything from exploring the possibility of the 2024 ballot measure, to taking a fresh look at city parking regulations, to implementing programs that mitigate tenant displacement when residential properties are redeveloped.

With the public hearing stage now complete, the budget will next come before council on June 27 for final approval. Council members enthusiastically supported the proposed budget with few requests for changes.

“This is an extraordinary budget,” Council member Lucas Ramirez said. “It’s really remarkable to think how far we’ve come, the uncertainty during the pandemic, and how resilient we were then and now – how healthy we are, to a point where we’re able to meaningfully and significantly invest in the organization.”

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Malea Martin
Malea Martin covers the city hall beat in Mountain View. Before joining the Mountain View Voice in 2022, she covered local politics and education for New Times San Luis Obispo, a weekly newspaper on the Central Coast of California. Read more >>

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local city government news. Become a member today.

'Getting back to business': Mountain View's budget looks strong in post-pandemic rebound

by / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Thu, Jun 15, 2023, 1:41 pm

According to Mountain View City Manager Kimbra McCarty, the city has “clearly emerged from the pandemic” – at least financially speaking.

Mountain View officials presented the proposed city budget for the next fiscal year at a June 13 council meeting. With city tax revenues rebounding and even surpassing pre-pandemic numbers, McCarthy said Mountain View is ready to get “back to business.”

The budget includes line items for a new city housing department, a paid parental leave pilot program for city staff, long-awaited capital improvement projects like rehabilitating the public safety building, and making good on promises to increase parks and open space in the city.

“We are more resilient than ever before,” McCarthy said.

Mountain View's stable financial position can be partly attributed to the city’s diverse revenue streams. As is the case with most jurisdictions, property taxes represent the largest chunk of the city’s general fund, at just more than 41%, or $74.6 million projected for fiscal year 2023-24. But unlike other cities, Mountain View also gets a significant portion of its money from property that it owns – some $28 million.

“Mountain View owns and leases land to various corporate and other businesses, and this is in the form of rents and leases that the city receives, making it a little bit unique from other cities in the area,” said Finance and Administrative Services Director Derek Rampone at the meeting. “The fact that the city has these additional resources has helped, over time, maintain some of the financial stability of the city, especially recently.”

Even with Mountain View’s strong financial position, McCarthy said the city will need to raise more funds to accomplish everything it wants to do in the years ahead, including the possibility of a ballot measure.

“This council was very prudent in putting a potential revenue measure on our work plan to think about in 2024, because we have a lot of very significant needs that we’re going to need to address in the future,” McCarthy said. "One of the most significant pressing issues that we have right now is the rehabilitation of our public safety building; also the rehabilitation of two fire stations that are very, very old and in need of repair."

If such a measure were to make it on the ballot next year and pass, in addition to addressing the aging public safety facilities, it would allow the city to add new parks and open spaces, implement decarbonization programs and build more affordable housing, the proposed budget states.

McCarthy said one of the most critical recommendations in the budget is the creation of a new city housing department, and specifically funding a new fulltime senior housing officer position.

“You all are aware that you just passed the housing element and thankfully we were also certified by the state,” McCarthy said as she addressed council Tuesday night. “Part of that involves 22 new projects as part of the housing element. So the new housing department is really necessary because we’re going to have to work on not only the current projects in the pipeline but also these 22 new projects that are in the housing element.”

There’s also nine projects and three land dedications specifically for affordable housing that are on the horizon in Mountain View, a total of about 1,300 units – projects that the new housing department will help manage and bring to fruition.

The city’s strong finances were also evidenced by new pilot programs built into the budget to promote staff mental wellness.

One is a new paid parental leave program that will offer staff who birth, foster or adopt a child up to eight weeks of paid leave. The pilot program is open to any new parent or guardian, not just the person who gives birth, McCarthy said. The annual estimated cost of such a program is $500,000, but the city’s setting aside $1 million in the budget to add some cushion and see how many people utilize the program.

“One of the things that we really want to focus on especially over this next year is continuing to build our great culture,” McCarthy said of the new program.

The city’s also setting aside $135,000 for mental wellness that will be split proportionally across departments. McCarthy said it will be largely up to individual departments to decide how they want to spend that money.

In addition to the public hearing for the 2023-24 budget, the council approved its strategic work plan for fiscal years 2023-24 and 2024-25 at the June 13 meeting. Top priority projects include everything from exploring the possibility of the 2024 ballot measure, to taking a fresh look at city parking regulations, to implementing programs that mitigate tenant displacement when residential properties are redeveloped.

With the public hearing stage now complete, the budget will next come before council on June 27 for final approval. Council members enthusiastically supported the proposed budget with few requests for changes.

“This is an extraordinary budget,” Council member Lucas Ramirez said. “It’s really remarkable to think how far we’ve come, the uncertainty during the pandemic, and how resilient we were then and now – how healthy we are, to a point where we’re able to meaningfully and significantly invest in the organization.”

Comments

SalsaMusic
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on Jun 15, 2023 at 9:14 pm
SalsaMusic, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on Jun 15, 2023 at 9:14 pm

it's a decent budget.


Jim
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Jun 16, 2023 at 7:35 am
Jim, Old Mountain View
Registered user
on Jun 16, 2023 at 7:35 am

How about finding ways to reduce the financial burden of exorbitant property taxes on <10yr residents, rather than “significantly invest in the organization”.


Leslie Bain
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on Jun 20, 2023 at 4:34 pm
Leslie Bain, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on Jun 20, 2023 at 4:34 pm

1) Q. Why do we need a ballot measure to “allow the city to add new parks and open spaces”.

A. MV YIMBY explains that our new housing element includes “A commitment to evaluate the totality of [developer] fees on an ongoing basis, and a robust program specifically for park in-lieu fees”. Web Link

Translation: Fees previously paid by developers to fund new parks and open spaces will no longer be collected. YIMBYs call them “unnecessary”. Look what is happening as a result. The city wants to raise property taxes on ordinary residents instead.

Net result: burden shifts from developers to residents. Will buying a home be less expensive? Probably not. If measure passes, the answer is “no”: home buyers will PAY HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES. If it fails, there's no guarantee that developers will pass on savings. Why would they? And parks and open spaces will suffer.

The rich get richer ...

2) “With city tax revenues rebounding and even surpassing pre-pandemic numbers, McCarthy said Mountain View is ready to get “back to business.””

Remember, only a few short months ago (Jan 2023) then Mayor Lucas Ramirez, together with council members Ellen Kamei and Pat Showalter, expressed concerns about cost of a special election to fill the vacancy left by Sally Lieber. Web Link

Ramirez said it would be really nice to have “funds for things that the community will actually NEED” (Web Link ~1.35.10), implying that the public's right to choose its political leaders doesn't even register on his radar as an important “need”.

Now we learn that the city is in good financial shape?

It was outrageous for the CC to take away voters’ rights back in Jan. Finding out MV actually had $$$ to pay for a special election after all is like rubbing salt in the wound.

Never forget that by filling the seat themselves, the CC essentially silenced the voice of voters when it came to the new Housing Element. Never forget that the new Housing Element benefits developers, Google, and high-wage earners far more than most residents. So much talk about “affordable housing” over the past two years, all done to manufacture consent for thousands and thousands of new units that are unaffordable to most people who live here.


Steven Nelson
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on Jun 22, 2023 at 1:59 pm
Steven Nelson, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on Jun 22, 2023 at 1:59 pm

thanks for details @Bain / now Fact Check? Your 1) A ... has "MV YIMBY" commenting on "a robust program specifically for park in-lieu fees" and then you "Translate". ... Can you please specify the MV City document (and provide link) where the City explains what you, personally "translate". Maybe (?) better to pull out the MV City text (probably in English) and then we won't have to (possibly) doubt your "translation".

best,

I'll probably, myself, forget that the CC appointed a person to fill a CC vacancy - especially if that person later 'runs for the Office and Wins.' time-will-tell

BTW agreed - thousands of market-rate + , so little BMR


Leslie Bain
Registered user
Cuesta Park
on Jun 23, 2023 at 1:27 pm
Leslie Bain, Cuesta Park
Registered user
on Jun 23, 2023 at 1:27 pm

@Steven, I am a big believer in transparency. One huge concern that I have about our new housing element is that one needs a PHd in "housing element" issues in order to thoroughly understand it. Do most voters have such expertise? No. That is very bad for democracy because laws are being passed that most of the public does not understand, and therefore cannot properly approve. Of course in this case, voters were never even given the opportunity to vote on these matters, they were forced upon us by the State.

I admit that I personally lack such a PHd, I only have about a Masters or so. I do not have intimate knowledge of city documents. I have had many conversations, though, with local YIMBY leaders who told me that they consider developer fees to be a "tax on housing" and therefore they opposed them. I agreed, they are a tax on housing, but that does not make them "bad". I said their advocacy was the equivalent of defunding schools and parks, because that is what those fees are used for. Governments collect taxes in order to pay for services, there is usually a bit of a logic to them. Developer fees are collected to enhance the shared infrastructure (such as schools and parks) that NEEDS to be enhanced when the population expands. It makes sense that the entities responsible for increasing the population (namely developers creating housing) share the burden of enhancing that infrastructure as part of the cost of doing business.

The shared infrastructure is akin to the Tragedy of the Commons. Everyone benefits from it, but nobody really wants to pay for it. I oppose the concept of corporations "privatizing the profits" and "socializing the costs". Developers make great profits, they are better able to pay for the shared infrastructure than ordinary residents.

I would be relieved if my translation was wrong, but then I would be confused about 1) why did MV YIMBY post those words (what do they actually mean?), and 2) why do we need a ballot measure to “allow the city to add new parks and open spaces”?

Re CC vacancy - remember that incumbents have tremendous advantages when running for re-election. That was acknowledge by the CC at the time, there was talk of requiring the appointee to not run for re-election because of it. Staff advised that was not possible, but CC moved forward with appointment process anyway. The appointee was given an enormous, unearned advantage if they choose to run for re-election.

“BTW agreed - thousands of market-rate + , so little BMR”

Thank you <3


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.