Over 1,000 new homes for Google? | December 3, 2010 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

News - December 3, 2010

Over 1,000 new homes for Google?

City Council to vote on major general plan study

by Daniel DeBolt

The City Council is expected to take a major step forward with a plan for the future of Mountain View on Tuesday, Dec. 7. Allowing zoning for as many as 1,500 new homes in the North Bayshore area among Google's offices is one of the potential scenarios to be studied in a massive city-wide environmental impact report.

The council will vote on a "strategy" for what should be studied in that EIR, and anything that is not studied is unlikely to make it into the city's updated general plan, which will serve as a blueprint for the city's development until 2030.

On Nov. 16, the council indicated support for studying the 1,500 homes amid new shops and restaurants in Google's neighborhood along Shoreline Boulevard just north of Highway 101 and at the west end of Plymouth Boulevard — but is not yet sold on implementing the idea.

Tsuda said on Wednesday that several North Bayshore property owners, not just Google, are interested in that idea, which could create a downtown feel next to Google's headquarters.

"If half the site were to redevelop, we could expect 1,500 (housing) units by 2030," City Planner Martin Alkyre said at the Nov. 16 meeting.

"That is assuming half of those sites transition to exclusively residential," said Planning Director Randy Tsuda. "We don't see that happening. We plan to insert policies about maintaining a mixture in that corridor."

The homes could be as dense as 70 dwelling units per acre under the EIR. For comparison, the controversial two-, three- and four-story Minton's development on Evelyn Avenue is about 60 units per acre.

The city is also coming up with a traffic and circulation plan for Google's office neighborhood to break up its "super blocks" and create a college campus feel.

There could be as many as 89,000 homes built in Mountain View under the strategy the council will consider Tuesday, according to city staff, up from the 65,000 that exist now. The city's current general plan allows up to 82,000 homes. Areas where new homes could be built include an up-zoned El Camino Real, Moffett Boulevard and a revamped San Antonio shopping Center. Traffic impacts will be studied.

But the largest impact may come from up-zoning the North Bayshore area, where nearly the entire area will see potential floor area ratios that could translate to Google office buildings seven stories high.

"We've already been accused of having far more jobs than we have housing for," said council member Laura Macias. "Something like 50,000 people a day come into this city for work. If we build this much office space ... what happens to the quality of life as we know it?"

The city also plans to study the impacts of redeveloped "village centers" throughout town, shopping centers where neighborhoods buy food and receive other services. Their locations include the intersections of Whisman Road and Middlefield Road, Rengstorff Avenue and Central Expressway, and Cuesta Drive and Miramonte Avenue.

There was some concern on Nov. 16 about the Francia family's orchard property on Whisman Road, which is labeled as a "city/community facility" on the general plan strategy map, even though city staff say they have not had any real discussion with the owners of the property. Council members and neighbors have been floating the idea for a bond-funded park there for years, but council member Inks called it the "first step, tip-toeing to a regulatory taking," and urged the city not to label the property as a public facility until the owners were ready to sell.

"The city should stay cool here and make sure it doesn't do anything that could be regarded as hostile," Inks said.

E-mail Daniel DeBolt at ddebolt@mv-voice.com


Like this comment
Posted by School and Parks Impact?
a resident of St. Francis Acres
on Dec 4, 2010 at 10:01 am

Can our school districts absorb so many new students, especially when new housing is an a redevelopment tax area (i.e. no property taxes going to schools)? Do the planners even realize that there is no public school on that side of 101 and that the high schools are even further .... South of El Camino?

Schools and parks planning seem to be sorely missing here...

Like this comment
Posted by Mike Laursen
a resident of Monta Loma
on Dec 4, 2010 at 11:43 am

Good question. I wonder if they can exclude the rezoned areas from the redevelopment area.

Like this comment
Posted by confused reader
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Dec 6, 2010 at 5:03 pm

Mountain View has currently 65,000 homes?
But it has a population of approx. 73,000.
Thus, there are 1.12 people per home?
Is this correct? Most homes in Mountain View are single person homes?
Could you have meant that there have been there are homes for 65,000 people and there will be homes for 89,000 under the plans if developed.
Ir are they really proposing building 24,000 more homes in mountain views.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Top restaurants to check out

Mountain View Voice readers have officially decided. See which local restaurants and businesses can now claim the title — Best Of Mountain View 2017.

View Winners