65 more homes coming to Evelyn Avenue | December 10, 2010 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

News - December 10, 2010

65 more homes coming to Evelyn Avenue

Council okays project despite VTA saying project isn't dense enough

by Daniel DeBolt

The City Council unanimously approved another large housing project along Evelyn Avenue on Tuesday, replacing a slew of auto shops with town homes that some say do not provide enough housing on the site.

With the approval of "Classics at Station 361" developer Classic Communities is set to build 45 detached homes and 20 townhouses at the corner of Evelyn and Calderon avenues. Two pairs of three-story buildings would face Evelyn Avenue and two-story detached homes would face the residential neighborhood along Villa Street.

In a letter to the council, the Valley Transportation Authority called for a project almost with almost four times as many homes on the 4.3-acre site, saying its proximity to the downtown transit center made it an ideal location for dense housing. But no one on the City Council said they shared that concern Tuesday. Only Mayor Ronit Bryant, who lives a few blocks away, was critical.

Bryant said she considered a vote against the project because of its street design.

"Alleys, courtyards, roads going nowhere, really degrades the character" of the neighborhood, Bryant said. "I'm hoping little squiggly alleys to fit in as many units as possible is not the way we are going."

City staff noted numerous "compromises" in the design, but nevertheless recommended the project's approval because it meets the city's "fundamental goal" of building housing in the area. Compromises include narrow, 20-foot wide streets, shortened garages, small rooms and smaller-than-usual lot sizes at 1,600 square feet instead of 2,000. Every home will have two parking spaces except one on an odd lot, which will have a one-car garage and no driveway.

The developer said the compromises were all necessary to make the project marketable and financially feasible.

"I'd like to say we have some credibility in this neighborhood," said Scott Ward of Classic Communities. "I know we're not the easiest guys to work with." The two-story homes across the street from the train station were built by Classic Communities in the 1990s.

The development will have a new public street that runs north-south to connect Villa to Evelyn at the west end of the site. And while some of the new streets are private and dead end at walls, one will be designated for the public right of way and runs east-west to connect Calderon Avenue to the new public street.

As for open space, the project meets city requirements by including small yards and 7,300 square feet of common open space in the center of the site, which includes a children's play area, shade trees and patio seating.

On Tuesday few residents spoke about the project. Robert Cox, a board member of the Old Mountain View Neighborhood Association, supported it.

The project will be built next to the controversial 203-unit development replacing Minton's Lumber and Supply.

While Minton's isn't going to be much taller at two- to four-and-a-half-stories in height, Classics at Station 361 will be 15 units per acre compared to the 60 units per acre at Minton's, which has an underground parking garage and larger apartment buildings.

However, the VTA guidelines supported by all 15 cities in Santa Clara County call for 55-unit per-acre densities within one-third mile of a regional transit center to help to meet housing demand while encouraging transit use. Caltrain, light rail and bus service are located almost directly across the street from the site.

The VTA is asking the developer to provide residents with light rail and bus passes.

Ward explained that borrowing money for a higher density project would cause too much "credit exposure" in the current housing market, which is "just plain awful."

Classic Communities had originally submitted plans for a 96-unit project in 2006, but withdrew the project as the City Council considered a halt on all high-density projects, stressed "quality over quantity" and criticized the project's lack of open space.

To be demolished are two houses on Villa Street and 100,000 square feet of auto shops and other commercial buildings in Abate's Industrial Square. Several properties at the corner of Calderon and Evelyn will remain, including La Fiesta restaurant and two auto shops.

The city will receive $1.5 million in park fees and another $1.5 million in below market rate (BMR) housing fees towards affordable housing elsewhere in the city.

A year ago, John Mozart, the owner of Classic Communities, threatened to sue Mountain View, saying the city's requirement for BMR fees is illegal under a recent court decision. His suit against a similar fee in Palo Alto was thrown out of court and he never pursued the suit against Mountain View.

The city expects the average home in the project will sell for about $750,000, which increases the value of the property to $49 million from $18 million. Property taxes for the city could more than double to $78,000 a year, a city staff report said.

E-mail Daniel DeBolt at ddebolt@mv-voice.com


Posted by Tim O, a resident of Blossom Valley
on Dec 11, 2010 at 11:48 am

I was disappointed to learn that the city council approved the construction of 65 homes along Evelyn Avenue. This council, -- like many before it -- has ignored the negative impact of building more and more housing in this small town. How much traffic congestion are residents willing to endure in Mountain View? This town already has some of the highest housing density on the peninsula. My question to the council is: Will “quality of life” considerations EVER become a priority in Mountain View? The time has come for residents to demand it.

Posted by Kristine, a resident of Monta Loma
on Dec 11, 2010 at 4:54 pm

......quite a bit of traffic we suffer from are due to allowing a number of neighbor communities to be bedroom communities that commute to our town's jobs and use our retail rather than build their towns jobs and services.

Also "quality of life", I've heard this thrown around alot but what is it referring to? We have many parks, we have good schools, we have safe neighborhoods. It's true we should consider locations for new schools, and like I said demand neighboring towns to be less traffic inducing leeches.

Posted by Daniel t., a resident of another community
on Aug 17, 2011 at 3:49 pm

As long as they make those homes like the cedar shingled ones at their Miramonte project I think it would be great, those homes are wonderful. I have a friend who lives there...

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields