City stands by cell tower regulations | January 14, 2011 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

Opinion - January 14, 2011

City stands by cell tower regulations

Why is it that parents and neighbors who almost certainly use cell phones in every part of their everyday life go ballistic when a cell phone tower is proposed near their homes or schools?

This mindset comes despite many findings that cell phone users are susceptible to receiving much more radiation from a handheld phone placed against the ear and carried close to the body in a pocket or purse than they ever would receive from a cell tower, or in this case its closely related cousin: a new WiMax tower that transmits data to cell phones and computers.

Nevertheless, many neighbors and preschool parents have been vehemently opposed to plans by the First Presbyterian Church at Miramonte and Cuesta to install a WiMax tower hidden in a steeple. They fear children attending the Little Acorn Preschool, about 50 to 75 feet from the tower, will be harmed by cancer-causing radiation. About 70 students attend the school, which is located on church property.

Many of the protestors are upset that the church did not notify them before a deal was struck to accept the tower, which came about after the company was unable to get approval to put it on the shopping center or office building across the street. Church spokesmen say the tower deal with Clear Wire LLC has been discussed internally since last July and that after examining research from the phone company, the church decided to go ahead.

Pastor Tim Boyer said the antennas were approved to provide a service, especially since the location is within a line of sight to nearby El Camino Hospital. Pastor Boyer declined to say how much the church would be paid to host the antennas.

After losing a November ruling from city Zoning Administrator Peter Gilli, who said he could not withhold approval of the tower unless radio frequency waves exceed FCC guidelines, the protestors attempted to use the city's own zoning ordinance, which does not specifically permit cell phone towers, to overturn the approval. But that argument failed Tuesday, when the council voted 4-1 to back the current ordinance and start the process to craft more definitive language that would permit towers in residential neighborhoods. If the ordinance had been interpreted as some protestors wanted, most of the city would be off limits to the towers, city staff said. Even new Google WiFi towers could be in jeopardy of violating the ordinance.

Absent any real data from protestors that showed the towers could be harmful, the City Council did the right thing in permitting them. They have been shown to emit only tiny radiation levels, well under the thresholds set by federal regulators. The council's decision should allow installation of First Presbyterian's tower, although we doubt that preschool parents and neighbors will be satisfied.

Zoning Administrator Gilli said approval of the tower is on the condition that parents would be able to pull their children from the preschool without being penalized with any fees or extra charges. That may not be enough for those who say the Little Acorn preschool is the most convenient and affordable for them.

We recommend parents study results from a "before and after" radiation level test planned by Clear Wire official Gordon Bell. He promised to post results at the church, which he said would show almost "undetectable" levels of radiation. If that is the case, as we suspect it will be, there will be no reason for preschool parents or neighbors to worry about cell phone tower radiation.


Posted by reply, a resident of Willowgate
on Jan 14, 2011 at 8:03 pm

$$$$$$$$$$$ talks

Posted by WWJD, a resident of Monta Loma
on Jan 14, 2011 at 8:21 pm

What would Jesus do? Pastor Tim Boyer - is this why you went into the clergy? To bring peace and joy to the world? To hold out your hand to your neighbor?

Take a good hard look in the mirror. And don't hide behind others. You are the front man behind this operation. Like it or not. Stand up, take charge, and do the right thing.

Posted by ted rees, a resident of Waverly Park
on Jul 7, 2011 at 10:43 pm

Why not have AT&T provide a few calculations to prove the radiation intensity point? At least we should know how much power a cell phone transmits, and how much power a tower transmits.
The power per unit area at a distance depends on how the power spreads out. One would expect that the cell phone power spreads out over a wide angle since it needs to strike a tower. One would also expect that a towers power spreads out widly since it needs to find a cell phone anywhere near the ground. One would expect the tower power to be at least as high as the phone power, since it needs to travel just as far as the phone's power. The tower power might be higher since it is not limited by battery drain, or danger from being next to an ear.
What are the numbers?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields