The above proposal alone would be enough to "allow Caltrain to retain much of its current service in the short term," Burns writes.
But he also says funds to prop up Caltrain's core service should be taken from other delayed Caltrain projects: electrification, which has been delayed along with high speed rail through the Peninsula, and $5.5 million for the Dumbarton Rail project. The Dumbarton Rail project is something "the region cannot afford at this time," Burns writes, but using the $5.5 million may pose legal issues.
The VTA is also considering the possibility of taking on a larger share of Caltrain's operating costs in exchange for saving service to Santa Clara County.
At the VTA board meeting last Thursday, "the full board was pretty much in consensus that Caltrain is a priority for us," said VTA board chair Margaret Abe-Koga, who is also a Mountain View City Council member. "Maybe we can negotiate keeping service for Santa Clara County folks if we put up our full share or a larger portion of it." The VTA is able to do that because "we worked really hard last year to straighten out our finances," she said.
Caltrain may declare a fiscal emergency in March and appears ready to make drastic cuts. It has proposed eliminating weekend service and service between San Jose and Gilroy. Trains would run only during weekday peak hours, cutting service nearly in half, from 86 trains on weekdays to only 48.
Friends of Caltrain said on its blog that it agreed with Burns' Caltrain funding proposals, including the idea of selling Caltrain property such as Diridon station in San Jose and using discretionary Metropolitan Transportation Commission funds to prop up Caltrain temporarily. But the group opposed "cannibalizing" Caltrain's electrification funds, which are "key to making Caltrain sustainable long term, enabling Caltrain to serve more riders at lower operating cost."
SamTrans responded to the VTA proposals in a statement by spokeswoman Christine Dunne. "SamTrans' funding issues were not created by VTA nor are they the VTA's to solve," Dunne said.
"We are willing to look at everything," she said. "Everything is on the table for analysis. We appreciate the continued support of the VTA. We understand that some people think VTA should help cover SamTrans' share of JPB funding. SamTrans' funding issues were not created by VTA nor are they the VTA's to solve. We recognize that VTA has its own commitment to the communities it serves just as SamTrans does. We will continue to work with our partners to find funding that can reduce the impact of the drastic cuts with which Caltrain is faced."
Goodbye San Antonio station?
If Caltrain follows through on its proposes cuts, service at up to seven stations may be eliminated, including Mountain View's San Antonio station, where 545 people board a train every weekday on average, according to Caltrain's 2010 ridership report.
Other stations on the chopping block are College Park, Belmont, Lawrence, Santa Clara, San Bruno, Burlingame, Hayward Park, Bayshore and South San Francisco. Those stations have similar ridership numbers.
At the San Antonio station Monday morning, about a dozen people waited for the 10:33 a.m. train. One rider, Jennifer, lives a few blocks away and boards the train at San Antonio daily for work in San Mateo. "It's convenient that it's walk-able," she said of the station's location near a large residential neighborhood and San Antonio Shopping Center. If the station were to close, taking the train would be much less attractive than driving because Jennifer would have to find a parking spot at the downtown Mountain View train station lot, which is "usually pretty full," she said.
"Having a good public transportation system is important," she said. "I enjoy taking the train."
Caltrain ridership overall has climbed from 26,000 riders in 2005 to 39,000 in 2010. It has recently started to decline slightly.
"Once you cut service it's just a downward spiral," Abe-Koga said. "If less people ride it, then there is less fare box" revenue for train service.
This story contains 791 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.