School bond measure near approval | February 24, 2012 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

News - February 24, 2012

School bond measure near approval

MV Whisman set to put $198 million in projects on June ballot

by Nick Veronin

The Mountain View Whisman School District board appears poised to move forward on a $198 million bond measure to pay for safety and facilities improvements at local elementary and middle schools.

The proposed bond would be supported by area home owners who would pay up to $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value. It requires a yes vote of 55 percent to pass. It would come on top of Measure C, the eight-year, $3 million voter-approved parcel tax that went into effect in 2009. Depending on parcel size, property owners are assessed anywhere from nearly $150 to over $1,000 a year under Measure C.

District administrators and trustees from the board reviewed the proposed bond measure's language at a Feb. 16 meeting. Although trustees could not comment on their intentions prior to the vote — scheduled for the board's March 1 meeting — it appears that the measure, set for the June ballot, has their support.

Trustee Ellen Wheeler called the School Facilities Improvement Plan — which outlines all the potential projects the bond may pay for — "a thrifty measure," and a "worthwhile use of taxpayer money."

The district administration will recommend that the board approve the measure next month, in time to get it on the June ballot, according to Craig Goldman, district superintendent.

Although the country has not yet fully recovered from the recession, Goldman said that the district cannot wait for these facilities improvements any longer.

"Facilities don't know that we're in an economic recession," Goldman said. "They continue to deteriorate, safety codes continue to change and educational issues have changing needs."

He pointed to a Dec. 2011 survey of 400 local voters, which showed the Mountain View community is both able and willing to support the district bond.

"We are very lucky that Silicon Valley, in general, and Mountain View, specifically, is thriving — notwithstanding the economic crisis," Goldman said.

The proposed measure has had one highly vocal critic. Steven Nelson, a Mountain View resident living in Cuesta Park, said that the superintendent "did a very poor job of getting community input, in my opinion."

Nelson is particularly upset that the district is not considering reopening Whisman Elementary School, which has been closed since 2000 and is currently leased to the German International School.

By including more projects to make district buildings more sustainable, he said, the district could easily make up for the money it generates through its leasing of Whisman or Slater Elementary School, which is occupied by a Google child care program.

"The Slater and Whisman area (on either side of Middlefield east of Highway 85) doesn't have access to a neighborhood school and it seems that the reason behind that is that it enables the other neighborhoods that have schools to have additional operational money."


Posted by Ron Haley, a resident of another community
on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:36 pm

What about the community opening up a charter school and claiming Whisman Elementary. That would be great for the local community! Perhaps it could be tied into BCS from an operational point of view!

Posted by Steven Nelson, a resident of Cuesta Park
on Feb 29, 2012 at 7:39 pm

How about our local PACT reclaiming a school? Rather than stuff another facility on the same block with District Office, a Google childcare, and another complete K-5 school? Whisman buildings are the only site in the district which all are rated Class 1 structurally.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields