High-speed rail price tag drops by $30B in new plan | April 6, 2012 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

News - April 6, 2012

High-speed rail price tag drops by $30B in new plan

by Gennady Sheyner

California's proposed high-speed rail system would extend from the Central Valley to the Los Angeles Basin within the next decade and would cost $30 billion less than previous estimates indicated under a new business plan that the agency charged with building the system released April 2.

The revised business plan, which the California High-Speed Rail Authority's board of directors expects to discuss and approve on April 12, estimates the cost at $68.4 billion and departs in many key ways from the draft the agency released in November. The new plan commits to building the system through a "blended" design under which high-speed rail and Caltrain would share two tracks on the Peninsula. It also calls for early investment in the northern and southern segments (known as the "bookends") of the San Francisco-to-Los Angeles line, including the long-awaited electrification of Caltrain on the Peninsula.

No train to nowhere

The revised plan also specifies for the first time that the first usable segment of the rail line would be a 300-mile segment from Central Valley south to the San Fernando Valley. This stretch, the plan states, "will be transformational in creating a passenger rail nexus between one of the fastest growing regions in the state with the state's largest population center."

This "initial operating section" would extend from Merced through Bakersfield and Palmdale to the San Fernando Valley, according to the business plan. The prior plan committed only to an "initial construction segment" — a set of train-less test tracks between north of Bakersfield and south of Merced (this segment was characterized by many critics as a "train to nowhere").

At a press conference in Fresno Monday morning, the rail authority's board Chair Dan Richard emphasized the significance difference between the agency's previous proposal for the system's initial phase and the one laid out in the new business plan.

"Beginning next year, we will begin construction here in the Valley not of a mere track but a fully operational 300-mile electrified operating segment that will connect the valley to the Los Angeles Basin," Richard said.

Caltrain improvements

The business plan also offers a firmer commitment from the rail authority to improve Caltrain and to rely on existing tracks on the Peninsula. This marks a dramatic departure from the rail authority's initial vision for the system — a four-track system along the Peninsula with high-speed rail on the inside tracks and Caltrain on the outside. The four-track design was widely panned, with many Peninsula residents and city officials expressed concerns about the seizure of property and the visual barriers a four-track system would necessitate.

The authority began to back away from the four-track design in its November business plan, which was amenable to the "blended" two-track approach. But the newly revised business plan cements its commitment to the blended design, which was first proposed a year ago by State Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, and state Assemblyman Rich Gordon, D-Menlo Park.

The blended approach, which places a greater emphasis on improving existing infrastructure than the four-track design, is expected shave more than 30 percent off the $98.5 billion price tag cited in the November plan. The new document pegs the cost of the San Francisco-to-Los Angeles system at $68.4 billion — still significantly higher than the $40 billion price tag presented to state voters in 2008.

The main driver behind the major cost spike between 2009 and 2011, according to the revised plan, is a greater reliance on tunnels and elevated structures throughout the system. The plan notes that the possible length of elevated structures went up from 77 miles in 2009 to between 113 and 140 miles under the current plan. The length of tunnels, meanwhile, increased from 32 miles to between 44 and 48 miles.

The proposed $68.4 billion system features new infrastructure between San Jose and Los Angeles, shared electrified tracks on the Peninsula and an upgrades to the Metrolink Corridor between Los Angeles and Anaheim.

"The benefits of investing in high-speed rail will be delivered far cheaper than previously estimated," the revised business plan states.

Funding concerns, Peninsula critics

Even with the lower cost estimate, funding remains a major wildcard. California voters had approved a $9.95 billion bond for the proposed system when they passed Proposition 1A in 2008. The bond measure requires the new system to be capable for whisking passengers between San Francisco and Los Angeles in about two-and-a-half hours.

The rail authority hopes to build the system through a combination of bond funding, federal grants, local contributions and private investments. So far, the system has received about $3 billion in grants from the federal government. At Monday's press conference in Fresno, Karen Hedlund, deputy administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration, praised the plan.

The new business plan is the latest milestone for a project has been facing intense scrutiny throughout the state and particularly on the Peninsula.

Republicans in Sacramento remain vehemently opposed to the project. Their counterparts in Congress have been equally adamant about resisting President Barack Obama's proposal to connect 80 percent of the nation through high-speed-rail systems in the next 25 years.

The rail authority's new business plan, by committing to the blended system and to early investments on the Peninsula, aims to win over some of the project's toughest critics. The rail authority's proposal to help electrify Caltrain — a long-awaited project that has languished under inadequate funding — was greeted with great enthusiasm last week by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which approved an agreement with the rail authority that includes a funding plan for the electrification.

Richard said Monday that upgrades to existing rail services, including Caltrain, "will provide near-term benefits" while also building "a portion of the system that we will ultimately be using."

But the new document is unlikely to assuage all of the Peninsula's concerns. Members of the Palo Alto council remain concerned about the fact that the rail authority's environmental impact report for the system still describes a four-track system. Councilman Pat Burt and others have also raised flags at recent meetings about the prospect of the rail authority seeking exemptions from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) — exemptions that would allow the agency to expedite its environmental-review process.

Authority board chair Richard cited on Monday recent media reports about the rail authority seeking CEQA exemptions and assured those present that the agency plans to fully comply with environmental law.

"Despite recent reports, we're not looking for CEQA exemptions," Richard said. "We're doing a full environmental-review process."

"This plan is about more than just high-speed rail as a standalone system or a 'cool train,' if you will," Richard said. "Our plan sees high-speed rail as a strategic tool in an integrated transportation system to meet California's growing mobility needs."


Like this comment
Posted by Zap
a resident of Shoreline West
on Apr 5, 2012 at 3:05 pm

STOP THIS HUGE WASTE OF TAXPAYER FUNDS! Yeah, I'm an ignorant and uninformed voter in the state of California, and I'm CONVINCED (NOT!!!) that NOW that the public is raising an uproar, the whole project will cost less!!! Well, it will cost less AT LEAST until just past the date of no return when the project can no longer just be cancelled - THEN, the news will surface that it will actually cost well over $130 BILLION DOLLARS (that's ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY followed by NINE ZEROES before you reach the decimal point), which is TRIPLE THE COST of the project when California voters narrowly approved it in 2008. THESE ARROGANT, SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS AND HIGH SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD MEMBERS apparently feel that the rest of us are ignorant, uninformed and just plain stupid. All that the voters have been fed have been LIES LIES LIES ... did you notice WHERE the first leg of this PORK BARREL TRAIN PROJECT goes FROM and TO??? I'm SHOCKED! (not) ... it goes FROM the San Fernando Valley to the nearly deserted southern portion of the central valley which is RIPE for real estate development and agricultural development. SO, southern Californians are once again trying to RAM THIS DOWN THE THROATS of the rest of Californians who DON'T WANT THIS WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONIES TO CONTINUE! As a Democratic voter in Anna Eschoo's district, I feel like I've been BETRAYED by her and her siding with this corrupt and problem-ridden PORK BARREL PROJECT for our oh-so-good buddies in the labor unions and in the real estate industry in the southern portion of the central valley. YO! HEY ANNA!!! QUIT playing quid pro quo games with southern California politicians, union leaders and big business moguls! It is UNETHICAL at the very least if YOU vote for their little pet project, a project that will undoubtedly make BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS for many of these soCal politicians AND for many of the members of the California High Speed Rail Authority's Board of Directors (the veil has been lifted Mr. Dan Richard, Chairman of the Board of the High Speed Rail Authority -- WE'RE ON TO YOU, you lying, deceiptful, and corrupt S.O.B.!!! The benefits of this horrible waste and misuse of taxpayers funds to southern California ARE HUGE! But the benefits to central and northern Californians are QUESTIONABLE to put it mildly, or to put it more sensibly, the benefits to central and northern Californians are miniscule. WE central and northern Californians will PAY for the majority of this joke of a rail system, but southern Californians will be the ones MAKING HUGE PROFITS as they sell right-of-way land THAT THEY BOUGHT FOR ALMOST PENNIES PER ACRE (as well as agricultural land with poor access that was worth ZERO before the high speed rail system) for BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS after buying it for just a few thousand dollars. STOP THIS HUGE WASTE OF TAXPAYER FUNDS!

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Top restaurants to check out

Mountain View Voice readers have officially decided. See which local restaurants and businesses can now claim the title — Best Of Mountain View 2017.

View Winners