City considers fees to reduce commuters | May 2, 2014 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

News - May 2, 2014

City considers fees to reduce commuters

Congestion plan may restrict solo trips to North Bayshore

by Daniel DeBolt

Though Google and others expressed concerns about potential unintended consequences, on Monday City Council members supported the use of "congestion pricing" as a way to enforce proposed limits on commuter traffic into the city's growing North Bayshore office park.

Like the system now used to collect tolls on the Golden Gate Bridge, license plate cameras would be installed on the three "gateway" roads providing the only vehicle access to the north side of Highway 101 in Mountain View, potentially enforcing a yet-to-be-determined fee on thousands of employees of Google, Intuit, Microsoft and others who choose to commute by car during morning rush hour instead of taking a shuttle or a bike.

"Some of the developers and companies may balk at this, but do you want 10 million cars in there or do you want us to manage this?" said City Council member Mike Kasperzak.

If approved in December as part of a "North Bayshore precise plan," Google and others would not be allowed to build up to 3.4 million square feet of new offices in North Bayshore unless traffic on the three roads is kept under their collective capacity limit of 18,900 trips between 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. — the so-called "cap." There are now 13,900 inbound trips during that period on an average workday. Shoreline Boulevard is already over capacity during morning rush hour by 60 car trips, causing regular traffic jams at Highway 101.

Google representatives did balk at the idea, at least as a first resort. Google real estate director John Igoe expressed concern about the unintended consequences of congestion pricing. He and Google transportation planner Jeral Poskey suggested the city try other measures first to manage traffic, including a new Charleston Road underpass to connect the road across Highway 101, and a new Highway 101 off-ramp onto Huff Avenue, possibly allowing better Google bus access.

"Let's do everything we can to improve (streets and intersections), then we can give up and say, that's the trip cap," said Poskey, who is overseeing the development of transportation strategy for Google in Mountain View.

In order to allow office growth and minimize traffic, City Council members have long discussed a hard limit on commuter car trips into North Bayshore. Council members have been inspired by success with such a cap imposed by the city of Palo Alto, which prevents the Stanford campus from expanding unless car trips are kept at 1989 levels. Mayor Chris Clark described congestion pricing as "a really good final tool we would have in our tool belt" to enforce such a cap.

"I personally was thrilled to see the trip cap because we've been talking about this a really long time," said council member Ronit Bryant. "If you have a trip cap, you have a trip cap. Everyone is responsible for it. It actually has teeth."

"I like it, I wouldn't even put it as last resort," said council member Margaret Abe-Koga of congestion pricing. She noted the success of new toll lanes on local highways she saw as a VTA board member. "I used to think it was just for rich people and didn't help poor people, but then I started looking at the data — it actually works" for everyone.

North Bayshore could see major redevelopment at the start of 2015, mostly for Google, allowing as many as 15,000 to 20,000 new employees in the city in the coming years. City Council members want more than half of the area's employees to give up driving to work alone.

North Bayshore employers would be forced to work together to meet the cap as part of a newly created Transit Management Agency if any company wishes to build new office buildings in North Bayshore. Council members said larger companies like Google may end up having to help smaller companies change commuter behavior. Such measures could include charging for parking, paying employees not to drive or encouraging more use of employee shuttles, Caltrain, bicycles and perhaps the building of a ferry terminal at Moffett Field.

Council members John Inks, John McAlister and Jac Siegel opposed moving forward with the traffic plans for North Bayshore, with Siegel expressing concern over the amount of office space in the works.

"I really have this fear that we are going to be one of the most unsuccessful office parks in the Bay Area," Siegel said. "And we haven't talked about the jobs-housing imbalance and its impacts on the city."

Resident Lenny Siegel (no relation to Jac), also opposed congestion pricing as leader of the Campaign for a Balanced Mountain View.

"Instead of developing strategies that punish commuters, the city should ameliorate the North Bayshore jobs-housing imbalance by restricting employment, promoting housing construction, and developing efficient transit," Siegel said in an email.

Advocates of congestion pricing say it has been effective in reducing traffic in Stockholm, London and Singapore, but Jac Siegel said the city was doing something wrong if it was already having to take such big-city measures.

Council candidate Jim Neal and others expressed concern about the potential impacts to small businesses in North Bayshore, where many restaurants and other businesses say they face closure because they can't compete with Google's free cafeterias and other free services.

"The people working at Google are likely the ones with more money," said resident Linda Curtis. "It's not penalizing them as much as people working at small businesses."

Community Development Director Randy Tsuda said there would be ways to focus on commuters to tech companies and to exempt some drivers, such as those who are going to Shoreline Park or who live in North Bayshore's mobile home park. To determine who is who, a license plate reader could be placed inside Shoreline Park, for example, Tsuda said.

The system may also be used to push traffic off an already gridlocked Shoreline Boulevard and onto the less-traveled North Bayshore gateways, Rengstorff Avenue and San Antonio Road. Tsuda suggested that San Antonio Road could be free at first, while the more popular routes would come with a price.

"It doesn't need to be one fee for each gateway," Tsuda told the council. "For some time, it could be potentially free at San Antonio Road. It's all about calibration to achieve your desired goal."

The council's goal is to make solo driver car trips only 45 percent of all commute trips into North Bayshore. The number now stands at 61 percent for Google alone. There would be easier interim goals as the area develops and alternatives to driving are created, Tsuda said.

Resident Bruce Karney expressed concern that parking garages would be built at the edges of North Bayshore, as has been proposed previously, to get around the trip cap. "That would not enhance the neighborhood or North Bayshore or reduce traffic on the highway," he said.

Karney also called on the city to build housing in North Bayshore so fewer Google employees would have to commute.

Tsuda assured council members that there would be numerous conditions and requirements that would likely delay full build out of North Bayshore for years, as many council members are concerned about overwhelming growth. Members watched as it took less than a year for new office proposals to max out the 1.1 million square feet allowed in the city's new general plan for the Whisman area, a cap that was supposed to last until 2030.

"The smarter thing to do is reduce the 3.4 million square feet and increase it as time goes on," Siegel said. "Once it's written and goes in, it becomes pretty much the way it goes."

The 3.4 million square feet proposed for North Bayshore would be in addition to about 2 million square feet of office space recently constructed, under construction or about to start construction in Mountain View. That includes a 1.1 million-square-foot campus Google is ready to build at a portion of NASA Ames within city limits. There is another 1 million square feet proposed for other parts of the city, mostly in the Whisman area, for a total of about 6.4 million square feet potentially coming to Mountain View soon, bringing tens of thousands of more commuters and potential residents to the city with a general plan that makes room for only about 7,000 new homes by 2030.


Like this comment
Posted by first post!
a resident of Bailey Park
on May 1, 2014 at 3:35 pm

first post!

Like this comment
Posted by SimpleAnswers
a resident of Cuesta Park
on May 2, 2014 at 6:38 pm

Council is missing the point once again!

To really affect traffic, quality of life, and cost of housing in Mountain View, we need to restrict the growth of jobs first and most. Put a FREEZE on all new office space in Mountain View.

That stops the bleeding and gives everyone a chance to work on other solutions.

A fee on commuters to North Bayshore has lots of tradeoffs. For one thing, it likely increase rents and housing costs in the rest of MV since Googlers will want even more to live here so they can bike to work.

Much better to freeze new office space, and encourage Google and others to build HOUSING in North Bayshore. That extra supply will help on housing costs in the rest of MV, plus it can help reduce traffic and bike/car issues by putting housing very close to those jobs.

Like this comment
Posted by concerned citizen
a resident of Old Mountain View
on May 2, 2014 at 11:52 pm

@Simpleanswers - I could not agree more, we need a FREEZE on new office space.

About housing in North Bayshore - Every sf of housing is one sf less of office space. So, maybe it's the best direction to go - with a mix of housing types - including low income, family-oriented, and ownership.

The thing is, though, I doubt that Google would be interested in supporting housing. Why would they? They want to expand into that 3.4 million sf of new office space that Council and Planning are apparently assuming is a done deal.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Top restaurants to check out

Mountain View Voice readers have officially decided. See which local restaurants and businesses can now claim the title — Best Of Mountain View 2017.

View Winners