Time to set parameters on council pay | May 2, 2014 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

Opinion - May 2, 2014

Time to set parameters on council pay

Compensation for City Council members and other elected public officials is far from uniform across various cities on the Peninsula, with pay ranging from $600 a month in Mountain View to nearly $2,000 a month in the adjoining city of Sunnyvale. Los Altos is on the low end, paying $300 a month, while a Cupertino council member receives more than $700 a month. Nearly all cities, including Mountain View, provide medical benefits, although not all council members take them.

But going forward, as city council members are overseeing budgets that are often hundreds of millions of dollars a year, it is time for the city to institute a professional approach for council compensation by setting a fair wage for city council members, including a built-in inflation escalator so that the issue is out of the way for many years to come.

The Mountain View City Council took a significant step forward last week when it voted to limit the size of a proposed salary increase to $400 a month, instead of doubling their earnings to $1,200, as was earlier suggested. The voters will decide whether to approve the ballot measure authorizing the raise to $1,000 a month with a cost of living escalator in the November election. If passed, the measure would take effect Jan. 1 next year, and would apply to a City Council with three new members.

In our view, this was a reasonable decision, although given the council's estimated workload of 30 hours a week, each member earns less than $9 an hour — less than the state's new $9-an-hour minimum wage that will kick in this July and jump to $10 in 2016.

The comparison begs the question of whether we want to pay our elected public officials less than the lowest salary permitted in the state. Also keep in mind that we are entrusting them with the city's nearly $100 million annual general fund budget. The total cost of the increase is $33,600 a year, a tiny fraction (.00003 percent) of city's budget.

There are other yardsticks to apply to council compensation. Here a few that were discussed by the council last week before deciding to approve an increase to $1,000 a month:

• A lower pay rate means that most renters and residents who work for a living could not afford to serve on the council, thus giving the edge to home owners, those who are retired, independently wealthy or are supported by spouses. While it would take three or four times more than $1,000 a month to attract anyone to the job who was going to depend entirely on a council salary to pay the bills, a higher wage would at least make it easier for someone with part-time job. Not surprisingly, there are currently no renters on the council. All members are home-owners who appear to be able to make ends meet and can afford to spend 30 hours a week on doing the city's business.

• Some have suggested that council members should be happy to serve as volunteers in the spirit of making a contribution of their time and expertise to the community. Hogwash! There is good reason to use volunteers on the various city commissions, but elected officials who make final decision on critical city issues deserve to receive a reasonable paycheck.

• Contrary to conventional wisdom, the council is actually making less today than in the 1960s and 1980s. A quick calculation by the Voice shows that the council's $250 a month pay in 1968 would be worth $1,697 in today's dollars and 1984's $500 monthly salary would be worth $1,137 today. Bringing council compensation up to $1,000 a month or even higher would hardly break the bank or be out of step with what has been paid many years ago.

In 2006, by a 4 percent margin, voters rejected a plan to triple council wages from $500 to $1,500 a month. Since then, council pay has gone up only $100 to $600. The modest proposal that will go before voters in November is a reasonable request to simply bring council compensation within sight of the minimum wage. It deserves serious consideration.


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields