The group also objects to the possibility that the popular Milk Pail could be forced out of the center due to the failure to reach an agreement with developer Merlone Geier for access to parking. Its current parking arrangement will run out in about two years.
Members of the group told the Voice that their main objective is to address the city's jobs-housing imbalance, which they believe is caused by the approval of job-producing office projects without a commensurate amount of housing. The group hopes to stop construction of two, six-story office buildings in the project, which at 397,000 square feet could produce an estimated 2,000-plus jobs.
The referendum on office development would be the third in just over six months by Peninsula voters who have used the initiative/referendum process to contest council zoning decisions.
In Palo Alto, residents of Barron Park managed to stop a multi-story senior housing complex in their mostly single-family home neighborhood by using a petition drive to get the question on the ballot. Despite being outspent in the hotly-contested city-wide campaign, the neighbors won and the senior housing complex was scrapped.
In Menlo Park's Allied Arts neighborhood, residents recently turned in what they hope will be more than the 1,740 signatures required to force a vote on their plan to reduce the office space component of two large projects on El Camino Real. If the county clerk approves the petitions, voters will either vote on the measure or the Menlo Park City Council will accept the initiative's requirements, giving residents what they wanted.
Siegel has been outspoken recently in support of a referendum on the North Bayshore precise plan to halt office growth for Google, LinkedIn and others. A call to build a new residential neighborhood in North Bayshore has been a central theme for the group. But members said that effort has been set aside for a few months in favor of taking on the San Antonio shopping center development.
Whether the Campaign for a Balanced Mountain View succeeds or not, we believe the City Council should heed Siegel's request to delay approving Phase II until a San Antonio precise plan for the area around the shopping center is completed, probably by the end of the year.
Siegel notes that there are many unanswered questions about how the proposed development would fit in the entire neighborhood. Among questions that planners need to address, he said, are parking, including shared parking for the Milk Pail Market, traffic circulation, transit access and design. In addition, Siegel said the city should consider replacing the office space with housing, including a good number of below-market-rate units, with many near transit.
These proposals make sense and would bring the volatile jobs-housing issue into play during the upcoming election. This way, a newly constituted council will have a chance to place its own imprint on the second phase of this highly visible and important project.
This story contains 661 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.