Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Armed with expertise gained from pushing electric car technology to the limit in race cars, NASA Ames-based Kleenspeed is announcing plans to develop an affordable electric passenger car for mass production.

Taking the company in this new direction is Kleenspeed CEO Timothy Collins, who bought out his partner Jerry Kroll last year. Though design details are under wraps, he says the goal is to build a $20,000 car by 2011 that can go 200 miles on a charge (the battery pack would be paid for separately in a monthly lease). A prototype is in design which the company plans to unveil by end of the summer this year. It’s been dubbed the “Kleenspeed project.”

“We are in the final stages completing the design,” Collins said. “But the proof is in the pudding. It will probably be two to three months before we have a prototype ready to announce.”

If electric cars are the future, then Kleenspeed is ahead of the game.

“The advantage of testing electric vehicle systems in a racing car is you’re pushing them as far as they’ll go,” Collins said.

The company’s “crown jewel” is an electric race car based on an IMSA lights racer. Last July it set the electric car lap record at Laguna Seca in Monterey at 1 minute, 42 seconds. But the company says that doesn’t come close to the performance potential for electric race cars. A 200 mile-per-hour Formula One race car is sitting in the shop now, awaiting development of an electric engine and drive train comparable to its 650 horsepower gas engine. “This is an awesome research platform,” said Kleenspeed’s chief technology officer Dante Zeviar.

While the company is still a Silicon Valley-style start-up with all but two employees paid in stock, Collins believes Kleenspeed can build 10,000 new cars a year for $200 million in funding, about what Tesla has spent so far on building a much smaller number of electric sports cars.

Collins has decided to refrain from serious fundraising right now, but once fund raising begins the company appears to be well connected. Collins himself is an investment banker and has spent nearly $1 million of his own money on Kleenspeed. Sitting on the company’s executive board is Peter Sprague, who helped rescue Aston Martin from bankruptcy in 1975. Advisers include Roy Chapin III, the son of the former American Motors CEO, a consultant who is well connected in Detroit.

The company is getting help in building a prototype from another NASA Ames tenant called Contactscale, owned by Dan Bolfing. Contactscale is housed in the service bays of the shuttered gas station at NASA Ames, just a few steps away from the former Home and Garden Center that houses Kleenspeed.

Bolfing is an expert in the use of composites who got his start as a teen making surfboards in his garage. He now uses computer-controlled equipment to produce composite car body shells at an unbeatable price, reducing the cost from millions of dollars to hundreds of thousands of dollars, Bolfing said. On Monday he was doing just that for a “neighborhood electric vehicle” under development by another company.

Though composite materials are usually relegated to the most expensive sports cars in the world, Collins says the Kleenspeed project will make extensive use of composites to keep weight down, thereby extending the battery pack’s range. He said new composite technology makes it financially viable for the project.

Collins said the composite chassis, once established, could also be the basis for a utility vehicle or truck the company could produce. Collins has been looking into the possibility of using the recently shuttered NUMMI car factory in Fremont, as are other electric car manufacturers. Kleenspeed hopes to build the major components of the car, excluding batteries.

“We are going to create our own motor, our own drive,” Collins said. “Our goal as a company is to purchase everything from ourselves.”

In addition to building their own cars, Kleenspeed will sell parts to other companies and individuals. For example, the super powerful electric drive train for the Formula One car could also be used to power large trucks. And a complete gas-to-electric conversion kit will soon be developed for the Mazda Miata, like the one parked in the shop Monday. The electric version will have a 100-mile range and performance and weight similar to that of the original car — for $15,000. The company is already selling a universal kit, without batteries, for $4,400.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Yes let’s get this all electric car going now…
    How about a truck like this all electric/solar one…
    affordable that we can drive now…
    All for it….

  2. RJ – I primarily work in the energy and electric utilities sector. I know that electric cars sound great, but the reality is different from most people’s conceptions.

    Any electric car that will be used in the US within the next 15 years will be no cleaner than an ICE (internal combustion engine) car would have been. The reason is that coal supplies about 50% of our power generation needs, and natural gas represents a good chunk of the rest of the pie (source: Energy Information Agency). In addition, natural gas is probably the most economic source of power right now, until someone shows that we can build nuclear power plants in the US as cheaply as the Japanese have over the last 15 years. So driving your electric car will in all likelihood only lead to an equal increase in natural gas consumption.

    “Yes, but renewables like solar and wind will change that picture, right?” The answer is no – at least not within the coming decade. In spite of the green wave that started to lead a lot of people to buy solar PV panels over the last few years, and in spite of massive government subsidies and incentives, what fraction of our energy needs in the US do you think were covered by solar and wind in 2009? Again, all you have to do is look at the EIA website to find the answer – renewables in 2009 covered 8% of our energy needs. And solar only accounted for 1% of renewables; that’s 0.08% of US energy. Wind was at 9% of renewables, i.e. 0.72%.

    Even if you quadruple these amounts within the next five years, which would be an amazing success, wind and solar will still remain close to insignificant. People do not realize how much energy our society requires to prosper.

    My conclusion is this – do not get caught in the hype around some of the green technologies; it is not entirely justified. We have been down the road of excessive optimism about these technologies before. In 1979, President Carter installed solar panels on the White House, as a symbol of his commitment to develop renewable energy sources. Look at where we are today…

  3. Still, it seems better to let the coal plant burn and perhaps do something about the emissions there, in a singular place, that can be upgraded as time goes on rather than have the emissions come from a huge number of permanent polluters. Maybe replace the coal plant with a nuclear plant in time, with reprocessed or thorium fuels. who knows. Anything we can do to reduce emissions or position ourselves to reduce emissions is needed.

    Also, the reason the solar panels went away is because Regan ripped them off. 🙂

  4. Thank you Daniel for an excellent description of our company. A small correction: Jim Sprague is Peter Sprague who saved Aston Martin and was Chairman of National Semiconductor for 30 years.
    In regard to the penetration of the smart grid, clean power and EV’s, I agree the transition will be slow but $10 gasoline is inevitable and an electric vehicle will be the economic option of choice at that point.

  5. It’s great to see a company working creatively to make EVs affordable. Of course they aren’t an easy cure to excessive fuel comsuption, but at least on the right path to less pollution and reliance on petroleum.

    Good luck KleenSpeed…

  6. @Atziluth,

    Carter installed the panels and Ronnie ripped them out. There is a alot of symbolism to go around!

    “Look at where we are today…”. Indeed. I think the conclusion is that we should have got more caught up in the message back then and followed through – and then we would not be in the same state we’re in now.

    A Road not Taken: http://www.roadnottaken.info/

  7. Raising $200 Million. Have at it. If it is a good idea, the market will invest in it.
    I really resent our tax dollars going to private companies like TESLA and Fisker for their folly projects.
    Tesla’s Model S – a $50,000 car with over $50k in batteries.

    Uncle sam is blowing money like printing more has no consequences.
    It does.
    We’ll all pay for this BS in the near future.
    BS means financial negligence of the current bunch of morons running this country.

  8. Too bad Collins was only looking into the possibility of using the NUMMI plant – looks like Tesla’s Elon Musk got word of this and decided to bail on leasing deals in Downey Calif and instead announced plans to partner with Toyota and lease space at….NUMMI!! I hope Kleenspeed prevails and can actually bring an affordable electric car to the public and not just pretend to while soaking industry, government and saucer-eyed investors like Tesla (http://www.npr.org/tablet/#story/?storyId=127027119)

  9. Tesla is a pioneer and plowed a lot of ground for KleenSpeed and all new EV companies. The NUMMI facility is 5 million square feet and Tesla only needs a fraction of that space. I believe that NUMMI should be re purposed for EV and alternative energy production. The end result would create thousands of jobs in the Bay Area for decades. Our facility will be located in the Bay Area and we want to continue our R&D presence at NASA and Mountain View.

  10. Regarding RJ’s posting about our enormous need for energy that would become required to power electric cars: I’m of the persuasion that every purchaser of a Leaf, or $20,000 Kleenspeed auto would install a solar system either at their home or office. The general public are fed up from what they see in the environment from fossil fuels and are going to seek to offset their electric usage, on their own accord. With many companies offering aggressive services for residential and commercial solar installation with incredible financing options, the cost is no longer much of an issue. Just had a talk with Real Goods Solar of California – they said a commuter car would take about 10 solar cells to power each day. That’s fairly easy and inexpensive to install on a residential roof.

  11. It’s interesting to note that the only way we make progress is by moving forward. If we get caught up in what CANNOT be done now, then we will never move forward. In the panic of war fear, science and technology have rocketed forward, because the fear of failure loosing at war is greater than the fear of lack of success in business. The truth is that we are closer to break through technology that will change the world than the present energy industry would be comfortable with. World stability and much of the wars fought in the last 50 years are centered around energy and power structures that will be drastically altered by new technologies. The idea that charging a car for $1.50 is not viable (compared to $30 gas?), because it just shifts the pollution from private car owner to coal plant is basically flawed. Our need to burn foreign oil is to blame at least in part for our very expensive need to fight foreign wars. Charging cars at night when use of our electric grid is at it’s lowest makes all kinds of sense. We have more than a two hundred year supply of coal and natural gas… I’m thinking we can get a whole lot more green tech up, running and producing energy before we run out of what is here in the US.

Leave a comment