Council kills request for detailed meeting minutes | January 13, 2012 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

News - January 13, 2012

Council kills request for detailed meeting minutes

by Daniel DeBolt

Planning commissioners upset about the city ending its practice of keeping a written record of meeting discussions didn't get a break from the City Council on Tuesday.

City Council members voted 4-3 to not go back to the old "summary minutes," which detail the discussions made by the council's advisory boards. That was despite a strongly worded letter from planning commissioners saying that the new action minutes were "of little use," showing only the results of a vote.

"I'm disappointed," said Planning Commissioner John McAlister. "It's time-consuming as it is to find out what was going on. Residents will find it harder to find out what's happening in Mountain View."

Council members Ronit Bryant, Laura Macias and Jac Siegel were in the minority in calling for a return of summary minutes.

"The summary minutes from the meetings of our boards is a tool that I as a council member have lost,"' Bryant said. "We spend a lot of time selecting people for the boards. When we ask people for advice, we don't ask for a yes or no answer."

"I never understood that there would be a gross loss of details," Macias said of the new action minutes.

A city staff report found that most other cities in the area use action minutes for the City Council and detailed summary minutes for planning commissions. The council decided to move both the council and the city's commissions and committees to action minutes last year.

Mayor Mike Kasperzak said he wanted to give the new minutes another six months because city staff promised to better summarize discussions in staff reports. Plus, he said, the city makes audio and video recordings of most meetings, though only the City Council and planning commission's are posted online.

"I don't think it's time to change yet, we need to see this out," Kasperzak said.

Council member Margaret Abe-Koga said she had watched the planning commission meetings "and for me, if I want to understand a topic, that is the easiest way to get a true discussion."

Bryant objected to that idea, saying she watched a planning commission meeting once and "it took me four to five hours. I cannot do that every two weeks, it's just not feasible."

Kasperzak and others put their hopes in time-stamping the video and audio recordings to make it easier to listen to only the parts you want to hear.

"We need to continue to improve the process so people can get more quickly through the audio or video tape," Kasperzak said.

The city will save $4,000 a year in transcription costs in not providing summary minutes for the planning commission, development review committee and zoning administrator meetings, according a staff report.

No other advisory board or commission opposed the move to action minutes, though Bruce England of the bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee said his committee was intending to send its own letter to the council.

Email Daniel DeBolt at


Like this comment
Posted by Common Sense
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Jan 12, 2012 at 5:58 pm

The article says 'No other advisory board or commission opposed the move to action minutes'

Actually, I am pretty sure that at most - maybe all - of the board and commissions were not even informed of the change prior the first council vote. It certainly was never listed on the agenda of any board that I saw in the preceding months.

So the real questions:
- which boards voted on a change to Action minutes prior to the Council decision to change?
- which boards have voted on Action minutes since the first Council decision?