Consultants justify big housing fee increases | November 16, 2012 | Mountain View Voice | Mountain View Online |

Mountain View Voice

News - November 16, 2012

Consultants justify big housing fee increases

Council looks to double affordable housing fees on commercial development

by Daniel DeBolt

In a city soon to be flooded with building proposals from Google and Intuit, council members said Tuesday that commercial developers of commercial buildings should pay more towards affordable housing.

This story contains 711 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe

Email Daniel DeBolt at


Like this comment
Posted by tod ford
a resident of Shoreline West
on Nov 16, 2012 at 2:10 am

single family homes with increased use of in-law units would help. but parking standards that limit street parking and arbitrary square foot minimums don't allow many to take this step. Slow growth needs an alternative to full scale development. increased density should not just be taken up solely by developers and their town homes while a old suburban status quo protects a static single family home process. there is a provision for boarding houses but no specifics. we need to retrofit our suburbs. we need grass roots solutions that changes single family homes into a more flexible arrangements that allow a larger family or group of tenants to live with a couple or a person living in a cottage. that small income can tip the balance on a long term mortgage to do all sorts of interesting changes on a case by case basis by homeowners, and not sell out the problem to developers. At the same time, not just put our heada in the sand as values dictate an unsustainable march to mcmansions. in mountain view there is a long history of this pragmatic rental market. it needs to be protected and harnessed. not legislated into a black market position.

Like this comment
Posted by BC
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Nov 18, 2012 at 11:05 am

Wait does the board know about the ave workers who earn a good salary but need to share housing with roommates because the housing is too expensive?

Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Castro City

on Jun 6, 2017 at 10:04 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?